25,000 mph spaceship vertically landing on a 2300 mph rock with no atmosphere to slow it down that we still can't do today with technology 10,000x better
but they did it 17x 50 years ago without a hitch or actual proof - lol.

Russia's satellite - did you hear about that on the television? And actually a "Satellite" wouldnt pass over the same area multiple times unless the earth is flat and stationary, sounds like the Russian's pulled a psyop on the USA Military "geniuses" at area 51.



This post was edited by card_sultan on Sep 20 2016 10:45am

Of course there is a reason, to keep fooling you.





This post was edited by card_sultan on Sep 20 2016 10:52am

Right just all people who saw the rocket taking off/capsule landing, all the photos/videos on the moon+rocks brought back+mirrors etc
What other evidence were you expecting btw?

As for slowing down don't forget the moons orbit is perpendicular to the direction of take off. That's the speed necessary to break from earth's gravity with zero thrust and by definition you would zero speed once you got far enough away.


for what purpose though

lol the kind of video editing needed to fake just sort of thing didn't exist in the 60's apparently
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G6A72ufn3l4

For sure a rocket took off from Earth, but explain how a spaceship capsule going 25,000+ mph lands on a moon rock going 2300 mph essential completing perfect pillow soft vertical landing and they did this 17x 50 years ago which out a hitch when the last 4x vertical landings they tried with the spacex program completely blew up and the last rocket they just blew up even before it even took off when technology back then was akin to a pocket calculator.

And show me this "footage" you claim exists - of the ship/capsule "landing" on the moon - not of the astronaut walking out of the capsule - i wanna see the actual landing - I wanna see a 25,000 mph space capsule make a pillow soft landing on a space rock going 2300 mph ok? And then explain the fuck out of that "science" ok? And then explain to me why the capsule when it returns to earth - just lands in the water, wake up ok?

This post was edited by card_sultan on Sep 20 2016 11:32am

look up escape velocity, the whole point of it is that the object decelerates under gravity once it reaches it eventually coming to virtual rest

by the time it reaches the moon it will be matching its speed with rotation and orbit allowing for a very easy landing, that video shows the take off just pretend it's in reverse odd that you don't see the moment of touch down though i admit, you'd think that would be the most important bit to include!

as for 17 missions 50 years ago they did 6 manned missions at the start but the unmanned have been spread out pretty evenly from then to now
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_missions_to_the_Moon

ok - jump off a bridge and show me how you "decelerate" because of gravity......

the stupid things people believe is so contradictory

the air is moving with the spin of the earth to account for balloons going up
but if your in an airplane - the air is not moving with the spin of the earth

Things fall and accelerate because of gravity on Earth

but things decelerate everywhere else......

This post was edited by card_sultan on Sep 20 2016 12:55pm

if you travel at 25000mps to escape earth by the time you reach the moon its only 1400mps!


easy if you jump up then you decelerate to rest before falling downwards

Astro Science is the avoiding of logic: the mental gymnastics you go though to convince yourself you weren't fooled is astronomical.



This post was edited by card_sultan on Sep 20 2016 12:56pm

Why don't you waste your time on something more productive? You're literally obsessing over something you clearly cannot convince anybody of.