I dont simply believe in all youtube videos - just like i dont believe anything that comes of your lips - your simple incapable of rational thought.

I dont believe in a high altitude pictures from Nasa that claims to show curve of the complete ball earth because they themselves say they are composites joined together and there are tons of photos/videos that are not from Nasa that show no curve.

Likes heres a photo - but who took this photo? Why does this photo just reveal the Earth was just photoshopped in? How did they take a single photo with 3 points of focus? And how did a spacecraft traveling at 25,000+ mph - actually land on a rock with limited gravity and absolutely no atmosphere to slow down - you think they engaged the air brakes?
Also they needed enough fuel to take back off - like why wouldn't that just explode in a ball of fire from a 25,000mph collision with a huge rock? Lol.



This post was edited by card_sultan on Sep 19 2016 03:07pm

I don't think there is anything called rocket fuel or anything that can slow rocket ships down.
And so i would also like to know your reasoning as to why we had to hide our private air craft at area 51 back when russia launched the first satellites every uhh can't remember how long, like 10 hours or so. So we just assumed that the satellite was above our air Base for a few minutes and then went and dicked around for 10 hours before coming back?
Or possible it really did have to rotate around the globe once again before it could take more pictures.

This post was edited by jigit on Sep 19 2016 08:12pm

I'd like to know why "space X" - which was planning on taking people into space and had bought land in Arizona to start construction and was selling tickets until Nasa stepped in and claimed "On no we must perfect vertical landing first" which is the dumbest idea ever and really they should have already perfected it in 1969 with all 17 moon missions claiming to land a 25,000 mph ship on a rock going 2300 mph, I would like a detailed explanation of how they pulled that off when they can't even do it today with technology 10,000x better - the last 4 times they tested it the rocket exploded, and then to avoid more embarrassment - they just blew up the rocket before the test - and their explanation is "Oh well going to space is dangerous"

I mean really? C'mon man.

So you just skip over my question huh.

I really dont understand your question exactly - what does hiding aircraft at area 51 have to do with landing rocketships on the moon?

Russia's satellite would pass over area 51 at exact times. Moving at a certain speed traveling around the Globe, the round earth. So we just ignore the proof of that?
Just messing with your flat earth theory. Maybe one day I'll wake you up

This post was edited by jigit on Sep 20 2016 02:10am

You just ignore the fact that there is no reason for nasa to lie about any of this
In fact it would be massively in their interest to show that exploration can give a lot of answers that experiments/theories on earth couldn't

I guess you think they don't want to tell people because it might shake their faith in the establishment/common knowledge. But people are going to find out sooner or later one way or another and it would be much worse then
Or maybe on their first mission someone made a mistake and said it was round then they've been too embarrassed to say they were wrong since?

^but there's no reason to lie in this case, in fact it's detrimental to them