That last post made it pretty clear he's just trolling.

"If anything we are making the atmosphere too oxygenated too quickly, and eventually it becomes so oxygenated that it catches fire and the world turns into a giant marshmallow."

Eventually the oxygen would leave his brain and we wouldn't suffer anymore reading his bs.

gg wuz ezpk

plz vouch

4 years ago, in 2014, someone wrote this post as a reply to an article coming from a conspirationist/climato-sceptist/fascist internet site (top 1 visited site on the whole french internet...)

You might learn a few things here and there :

"I work on climate and things to do on this article. For there to be a greenhouse effect on the quality of matter around the globe, there is no greenhouse effect amplifies the phenomenon of cyclones and hurricanes, localized floods, and drought.

The warming of air masses is due to the decrease of forests (equatorial, in North America, etc.) in favor of vast areas of cultivation and breeding, vehicles of all kinds, various industries, livestock intensively, the activity of cities that warm up the air, the concrete soil that captures and then returns to heat while the earth has a role of heat sink, in addition to that the air is polluted by fuels and fossil fuel combustion used for electricity generation.
Glaciers are melting is certain and visible by image that this satellite is at the North Pole or even in our countries (Glacier bossons, Mont Blanc ...).

The rise of the waters is a means to see an increase in the temperature on the ground and the evaporation of the volume and thus the thickness of the atmosphere and the level of the sea.
This is an influence on the monsoons that the force and the frequency of hurricanes, heavy rainfall and floods here and there. no to a particular gas.

Only nobody is ready to change the model of society not only energy, but also in terms of production and consumption, and especially not at the level of our elites."



predicatble

This post was edited by Melatonina on Sep 6 2018 03:25pm

wut?

Can you please explain this with the quotes and citations of thousands of scientists.

At least one of them has to have wont he nobel peace prize in the topic area.

-e



Still waiting on you to accept calendar slippage is a real thing, that has been ignored for about 5000 years.

-e2

Also, Al Gore thinks the earth is going to be fine as of 2016. Nuff said.

/thread. GG

This post was edited by Ep0ch on Sep 6 2018 03:26pm

keep showing how little you know about the world behind your comp nerd

E/ No. Only in your imagination. Still waiting you to tell me how much time CO2 and CH4 takes to vanish into space XD
Al Gore isn't anymore credible for making long-term climate previsions than my neighbour or my cat.
deal with it

You can see the whole thing there, it's pretty sad that some poeple still believe that in 2018 after all the knowledge we learned about climate.
https://www.egaliteetreconciliation.fr/Les-arnaques-au-rechauffement-climatique-de-plus-en-plus-de-revelations-25284.html?hc_location=ufi

This post was edited by Melatonina on Sep 6 2018 03:45pm

XD

This post was edited by Melatonina on Sep 6 2018 03:43pm

How sad

https://www.climate-lab-book.ac.uk/author/ehawkins/

More by the same guy, not cherry picked bs like you tried to pull.

The summation is there are two schools of thought, those who think the damage is too severe and we are already doomed, and those who do not.


I am the latter, which are you?

Btw, ed hawking is the latter as well, since your sourcing him.

This post was edited by Ep0ch on Sep 6 2018 05:13pm

It's probably too great to fix without serious sequestration efforts in addition to cuts in emissions. But anything is possible if you add enough energy.