According to Allan Snyder's works, the dominance of one brain hemisphere is a THEORY and not a hypothesis.
If you inhibe the left hemisphere, then you become more creative.

That's an evidence of the hypothesis, which becomes a theory.

I’d love for you to link the scientific publication so I can point out your incorrect interpretation.

have you seen the video?!



He has proven that he can increase creativity by inhibiting the left cerebral hemisphere.



Some people in the world are creative (Albert Einstein, Leonard de Vinci), and some people aren't.

This post was edited by Chevaucheur on Jul 24 2018 03:00pm

There is a very big problem with science.

YOU NEED MONEY.
You need money.

Scientists need money to turn hypotheses into theories and then into scientific truth.

hypothesis --> theory --> scientific truth

This is a big defect of science.

Can you understand these tweets?



No, you can't.
And it's sad.
Because it's a one more proof of my "hypothesis" which actually is a theory.



https://forums.d2jsp.org/topic.php?t=79197807&f=150

This post was edited by Chevaucheur on Jul 24 2018 04:13pm

Need a scientific assessment. Videos are not adequate evidence for something like this.

The fact that you even say "scientific truth" shows you have no idea how science works.

This post was edited by Thor123422 on Jul 24 2018 09:50pm

You remind me of my late grandmother.
She liked to make meaningless criticisms without thinking.

I already proved you I am a pharmacist..
Stop crying...
Stop whining...

This post was edited by Chevaucheur on Jul 24 2018 10:03pm

Science never deals with truth. It is always provisional and may be revised if and when new information arises.

This is very basic science.

1+1 = ???

Acide acetylsalicylique and paracetamol are good molecules against pain.

This is not a theory.
This is a truth.

Some truth may be re examined, but most of te time, they aren't.