The Case For Electromagnetic Universe - Topic

Member

Posts: 14,099

Joined: Jul 13 2006

Gold: 83.30

Jun 17 2016 04:12am

I guess I'll ask the most important question:

Have you performed experiments to substantiate your premises? If not, what would the methodology be?

armour

Member

Posts: 13,623

Joined: Jun 10 2006

Gold: 840.00

#32

Jun 17 2016 05:39am

wasn't even a good laugh :/

Thor123422

Member

Posts: 64,732

Joined: Oct 25 2006

Gold: 260.11

#33

Jun 17 2016 07:09am

Quote (MaliceMizer @ Jun 17 2016 02:37am)

Your astropriest Neil T gives you descriptions & I give you tangibility but you still contend I should explain the entire reality by definitions?
I'll only dance your monkey so long before you have to address my points instead of masquerade behind semantics in language.

http://i.imgur.com/HUSbCvo.png

Obviously I'm dividing two sides of the same coin, where a confusion MIGHT OCCUR in terminology, but you as a supposed student of physics should be rejoicing such profound simplifications. Instead you blindly turn up your nose in your bandwagoning fallacious assertions.

The confusion occurs because you are hiding behind terminology instead of explaining the idea. You are creating word salad to sound smart but lack actual substance in your sentences.

thesnipa

Member

Posts: 91,085

Joined: Dec 31 2007

Gold: 2,504.69

#34

Jun 17 2016 12:27pm

Quote (MaliceMizer @ Jun 17 2016 02:37am)

Language helps to make posts coherent.

majorblood

Member

Posts: 53,600

Joined: Jun 5 2006

Gold: 14,588.33

#35

Jun 17 2016 03:09pm

Quote (MaliceMizer @ Jun 17 2016 01:32am)

Biologically & gender implied mounting and dismounting of particles all the way up to galaxies I might surmise.
To say it's endless is undeniably an unfounded assumption, especially since most Field Theorists believe in a supersymmetry which would probably manifest to show very finite. Perhaps I may have been projecting my faith in divinity on that one.

particles have gender?

MaliceMizer

Member

Posts: 13,231

Joined: Feb 1 2010

Gold: 4.77

#36

Jun 17 2016 03:18pm

Quote (balrog66 @ 17 Jun 2016 05:12)

I guess I'll ask the most important question:

Have you performed experiments to substantiate your premises? If not, what would the methodology be?

Quote (Thor123422 @ 17 Jun 2016 08:09)

The confusion occurs because you are hiding behind terminology instead of explaining the idea. You are creating word salad to sound smart but lack actual substance in your sentences.

Quote (thesnipa @ 17 Jun 2016 13:27)

Language helps to make posts coherent.

I posted this in PaRD first of all where it would be a silly theological assertion to be extrapolated on and you CRIED TO HAVE IT MOVED. Now I talk 2 smart 4 u?
I'm hiding behind no language, I'm simplifying an expression.

Quote

The God field, being a culmination of all the laws of the universe, willed into mind an unreality.
This unreality possessed principals, 4 truths of the all can be expressed perfectly with just numbers.
Numbers themselves, being little more than a variety of 0s or 1s are more importantly just spacial or counterspacial & most importantly structured in a manner which produces 01.

Time, being an imaginary division of two sides of the same unreality, 0 and 1, Energizes a hole through the middle (centripetal and centrifugal converging vortexes) of our 0 and 1 cell, to send it on a perpetual motion of turning in on itself in the way you might observe a snake chase it's own tail and once secured, roll to expose it's glistening white belly.

Real science, like chemistry, calls this Dz^2
Quack science perversion I mean quantum mechanics calls this atomic model the atom.

And particle physics call it the evidence of gravity. :rofl:

Quote (balrog66 @ 17 Jun 2016 05:12)

I guess I'll ask the most important question:

Have you performed experiments to substantiate your premises? If not, what would the methodology be?

math is good enough 4 u rite?

majorblood

Member

Posts: 53,600

Joined: Jun 5 2006

Gold: 14,588.33

#37

Jun 17 2016 03:21pm

Quote (MaliceMizer @ Jun 17 2016 01:18pm)

I posted this in PaRD first of all where it would be a silly theological assertion to be extrapolated on and you CRIED TO HAVE IT MOVED. Now I talk 2 smart 4 u?
I'm hiding behind no language, I'm simplifying an expression.

Real science, like chemistry, calls this Dz^2
Quack science perversion I mean quantum mechanics calls this atomic model the atom.

http://i.imgur.com/8M096r4.png

And particle physics call it the evidence of gravity. :rofl:

math is good enough 4 u rite?

http://i.imgur.com/bt3PXC4.png

quantum mechanics is quack science?

MaliceMizer

Member

Posts: 13,231

Joined: Feb 1 2010

Gold: 4.77

#38

Jun 17 2016 03:23pm

Quote (majorblood @ 17 Jun 2016 16:21)

quantum mechanics is quack science?

it's a perversion of particle physics, which is the quackery.

but 3 left turns make a right

This post was edited by MaliceMizer on Jun 17 2016 03:24pm

majorblood

Member

Posts: 53,600

Joined: Jun 5 2006

Gold: 14,588.33

#39

Jun 17 2016 03:24pm

Quote (MaliceMizer @ Jun 17 2016 01:23pm)

it's a perversion of particle physics, which is the quackery.

so should I add quantum mechanics to the list of things Flat earthers/hollow earthers deny?

MaliceMizer

Member

Posts: 13,231

Joined: Feb 1 2010

Gold: 4.77

#40

Jun 17 2016 03:25pm

Quote (majorblood @ 17 Jun 2016 16:24)

so should I add quantum mechanics to the list of things Flat earthers/hollow earthers deny?

my assertion in this topic would be flat earth is a government and/or illuminati guided tangent to discredit or discourage anyone who questions reality again. Just as you're strawmanning me now.

This post was edited by MaliceMizer on Jun 17 2016 03:42pm

Go Back To Science, Technology & Nature Topic List