Quote (russian @ Mar 31 2014 09:29pm)
We actually had this discussion with my relatives a couple years ago, and didn't come to a unanimous agreement. It's pretty common to say "it's cold in space", but what does that really mean? Temperature can't exist in a vacuum, because temperature is really the kinetic energy of molecules. And without any matter (or at least very little) surrounding a body, no heat is lost through convection. Really, vacuum should work like an amazing insulator and the only heat loss would be through radiation. So wouldn't you actually lose heat very slowly? Meaning that warm oil pumped through space would probably stay warm for the entire journey to Earth?
yes, convection is negligible , and so is conduction at ends of the pipe.
but, radiation is not negligible when there is a temperature difference since the equation involves temperatures^4
q"=emissivity*(Boltzman)(t^4 -t^4)
assuming the fluid is at -179c, 94k, from the article
and i just googled searched outer space to be about 4k
radiative flux =(.9)(5.6703*10^-8)[(94^4) - (4^4)] = 4W/m^2
I'd say it'd have plenty of time to cool down, otherwise spacecrafts wouldn't need internal heating
Quote (taekvideo @ Mar 31 2014 03:33pm)
How you start the flow is irrelevant. It would work just as well if you simply submerged the hose in the gas beforehand to prefill the tube, no sucking required.
The siphon effect isn't what starts the flow, its what keeps the flow going (on its own), and air pressure isn't the force responsible.
fluid motion = due to pressure gradient
This post was edited by saber_x3 on Mar 31 2014 11:16pm