d2jsp
Log InRegister
d2jsp Forums > Off-Topic > General Chat > Science, Technology & Nature > Smart People Helm Me Solve This Problem
Prev12345Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll
Member
Posts: 13,578
Joined: Jul 27 2010
Gold: 2,285.00
Sep 14 2012 06:49pm
Quote (EndlessSky @ Sep 14 2012 11:44am)
Its meant to stimulate discussion and test your level of familiarity with physics.

Exactly. It's not a question that has a right answer. The professor probably doesn't even care about the final answer that you provide. What matters is the time you spent thinking about it and the thought process you used to get there.

For example, if you thought about Newton's Second Law, you could notice that it isn't always represented by F = m * a. Sometimes it's written F = dp / dt, i.e. the instantaneous change in momentum over time. The immovable object cannot be moved, so that means its momentum can never change. This means that it is impossible for any force to act on it. The unstoppable force similarly can't have its momentum change, and no outside forces can act on IT.

Now the real fun begins when you stop looking at things from the reference frame of the immovable object, and start looking at it from the reference frame of the unstoppable force. From the reference frame of the unstoppable force, it isn't actually moving at all, and it's the immovable object that's rapidly approaching IT.
Member
Posts: 36,389
Joined: Jul 18 2008
Gold: 3,192.00
Sep 14 2012 07:51pm
The wall moves and the object stops.
Member
Posts: 18,010
Joined: Apr 8 2008
Gold: 8,653.74
Sep 16 2012 11:24am
posting in cool thread
Member
Posts: 9,982
Joined: Jun 11 2009
Gold: 0.00
Sep 17 2012 07:30am
Question is silly, unstoppable emplies it is infinitely high and cannot be turned into heat or sound energy?

I dont get it, when you get the answer pm me im interested.
Member
Posts: 26,745
Joined: Nov 22 2005
Gold: 3.38
Sep 19 2012 06:13pm
Take Engineering Statics...
Member
Posts: 21,265
Joined: Mar 8 2006
Gold: 55.44
Sep 20 2012 04:21am
Quote (AEtheric @ 13 Sep 2012 08:40)
-infinity + infinity = 0


Why you add a - in that formula ?

Quote (Lifebane99 @ 14 Sep 2012 05:25)
I would say the unstoppable force would continue along the unmovable object in the direction it was most facing when they collided.


Yeah
Member
Posts: 70,681
Joined: Nov 28 2007
Gold: 3,622.67
Sep 20 2012 04:30am
dats how babies made
Member
Posts: 17,028
Joined: Jan 18 2005
Gold: 15,778.00
Sep 20 2012 05:02pm
There are a couple assumptions here that I think are fallacies.

An unstoppable force does not equal an infinite amount of force nor does an immovable object have to have an infinite amount of mass. Those are possible solutions but not the only ones.


If both objects are unable to be affected by outside forces then they can absolutely have finite force and mass values (although that is not necessary either) and still meet all requirements of being unstoppable and immovable respectively.

In this case both objects would pass through each other without even noticing that an intersection had occurred.
Member
Posts: 17,393
Joined: Aug 8 2008
Gold: 246.08
Sep 20 2012 07:36pm
unstoppable force goes through the wall and out the other side provided it's absolutely unstoppable. the immovable wall doesn't move because the unstoppable force goes through empty space within the wall's atoms. at least that's how i interpret it.
Member
Posts: 4,845
Joined: Apr 28 2005
Gold: 30,078.00
Sep 21 2012 09:52pm
Maybe when the force impacts the wall (at an angle?) it simply rebounds and continues on? The wall doesn't move, and the force isn't stopped.

Go Back To Science, Technology & Nature Topic List
Prev12345Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll