d2jsp
Log InRegister
d2jsp Forums > Off-Topic > General Chat > Science, Technology & Nature > Is The Universe Expanding Now
Prev1234
Add Reply New Topic New Poll
Member
Posts: 20,461
Joined: Jun 16 2008
Gold: 722.53
Warn: 10%
Mar 20 2012 04:29pm

http://electric-cosmos.org/arp.htm

"Arp discovered, by taking photographs through the big telescopes, that many pairs of quasars (quasi-stellar objects) which have extremely high redshift z values (and are therefore thought to be receding from us very rapidly - and thus must be located at a great distance from us) are physically associated with galaxies that have low redshift and are known to be relatively close by. Arp has photographs of many pairs of high redshift quasars that are symmetrically located on either side of what he suggests are their parent, low redshift galaxies. These pairings occur much more often than the probabilities of random placement would allow. Mainstream astrophysicists try to explain away Arp's observations of connected galaxies and quasars as being "illusions" or "coincidences of apparent location". But, the large number of physically associated quasars and low red shift galaxies that he has photographed and cataloged defies that evasion. It simply happens too often

Because of Arp's photos, the assumption that high red shift objects have to be very far away - on which the "Big Bang" theory and all of "accepted cosmology" is based - is proven to be wrong! The Big Bang theory is therefore falsified. "
Member
Posts: 5,908
Joined: Feb 12 2007
Gold: 18,018.95
Mar 20 2012 05:05pm
Quote (Derkaderk @ Mar 20 2012 04:22pm)
If space was inflating slower than light, would light be able to leave the universe?


no

the universe is either an infinite plan or finite torus (in both cases finite on the z axis).

If the universe is finite, the light would probably just curve back on itself similar to a black hole
If the universe is infinite, then it would never leave just based on the definition of what infinite means
Member
Posts: 5,908
Joined: Feb 12 2007
Gold: 18,018.95
Mar 20 2012 05:06pm
Quote (AEtheric @ Mar 20 2012 05:29pm)
http://electric-cosmos.org/arp.htm

"Arp discovered, by taking photographs through the big telescopes, that many pairs of quasars (quasi-stellar objects) which have extremely high redshift z values (and are therefore thought to be receding from us very rapidly - and thus must be located at a great distance from us) are physically associated with galaxies that have low redshift and are known to be relatively close by. Arp has photographs of many pairs of high redshift quasars that are symmetrically located on either side of what he suggests are their parent, low redshift galaxies. These pairings occur much more often than the probabilities of random placement would allow. Mainstream astrophysicists try to explain away Arp's observations of connected galaxies and quasars as being "illusions" or "coincidences of apparent location". But, the large number of physically associated quasars and low red shift galaxies that he has photographed and cataloged defies that evasion. It simply happens too often

Because of Arp's photos, the assumption that high red shift objects have to be very far away - on which the "Big Bang" theory and all of "accepted cosmology" is based - is proven to be wrong! The Big Bang theory is therefore falsified. "


arps photos are illusions or conincedences of apparent location
Member
Posts: 33,139
Joined: Jun 25 2008
Gold: 145,965.50
May 15 2012 09:03am
Quote (TIMMY213 @ Mar 3 2012 12:07pm)
This was once thought to be plausible, but observation tells us that the universe is expanding at an accelerating rate. This is why dark matter exists in scientific theory, as a sort of repulsive force to match matters' attractive force (gravity) to explain how the universe is expanding at an accelerating rate. In a hypothetical universe without dark matter this would be the case, so not a bad idea.


Ahhhh, okay finally I understand why the universe could be expanding forever, because of the repulsive force of dark matter.
Always thought it had to get back together over the long run due to the never ending force of gravity.

This post was edited by YaC on May 15 2012 09:05am
Member
Posts: 3,657
Joined: Aug 26 2008
Gold: 437.68
May 15 2012 11:44am
Quote (YaC @ May 15 2012 11:03am)
Ahhhh, okay finally I understand why the universe could be expanding forever, because of the repulsive force of dark matter.
Always thought it had to get back together over the long run due to the never ending force of gravity.


Correct me if I'm wrong, but Dark Matter would have a gravitational force since it is in fact matter. Dark Energy is the repulsive force.

I've heard of a theory where the expansion of the universe would slow down due to the gravitational effect of dark matter, come to a stop, and then begin collapsing back down.

And remember guys and gals...ALL of these are just theories.
Member
Posts: 5
Joined: May 16 2012
Gold: 0.00
May 16 2012 01:56pm
yes
Member
Posts: 33,215
Joined: Jun 30 2007
Gold: 480.60
May 17 2012 01:08am
Go Back To Science, Technology & Nature Topic List
Prev1234
Add Reply New Topic New Poll