Quote (AEtheric @ Oct 8 2011 12:38am)
If you look at the context that sentence is in its obvious they're not really saying the exact same thing.
So you like to pick hairs?
Quote (djeb081292 @ Oct 8 2011 12:00pm)
that fucking answer is so god damn stupid.
we exist to exist
what the fuck attempt of an answer is that shit? he is literally spewing shit out of his mouth so idiots like you will follow him. answering the question "why do we exist " with " we have to" is idiotic. non- existence is not full, it grows bigger every time someone dies.
we have no greater reason to existence, besides the fact either we are here by blind luck, and have 0 reason to exist,( or we are here b/c a greater creation put us here )( for religious people)
"0 reason to exist"
-djeb081292
"there is no room in non existence for the things that do exist therefore if it exists it doesn't need to explain why it exists it exists because it is not non existence therefore the only place it can be is in existence"
-bashar
Bashar is not really giving a reason in his statement so I do believe you agree with him
its funny how everyone who is against this is saying the same context just different words