the argument against weed is retarded... lower crime rates, lower drug cartels from mexico, better economy boost, and what the fuck is someone high gonna behind the wheel drive 10 mph under the speed limit?

not to mention it's also better for the environment, the debate is comparing drunk people while driving
to high people while driving.

meh its w/e they had regulations in for what they were tryin to pass in california you would have to be 21 and you could only get a certain amount, it would be treated like alcohol, and alcohol is way worse for you not to mention at 21 which woulda been the same age for weed, you have way more access to alc everywhere..

This post was edited by kelphie on May 2 2011 12:29am

I believe the active ingredient in marijuana (THC) is a drug

it shouldnt qualify as a drug, wish it was over the counter stuff

Doctors can prescribe most street drugs with the Exception of Crack, Heroin(if not in England) and most/all of the Hallucinogens.

So i don't see your point.

A medicine that has roughly 4x the amount of tar in it as cigarettes.

What is the difference other than the legality of them? Keep in mind, the legality of pharmaceuticals is always changing, as companies always try to push out new "experimental" drugs (meaning not fully tested), and the FDA is a joke.

Inhaling any form of combusted plant material is bad for you. You fail to realize that smoking cannabis isn't the only way to consume it.

i just want to point out that "alters your mind" is not the definition of a drug.

this is the definition of a drug.

"A substance that has a physiological effect when ingested or otherwise introduced into the body"