d2jsp
Log InRegister
d2jsp Forums > Off-Topic > General Chat > Science, Technology & Nature > Question For You Guys
Prev12345Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll
Member
Posts: 15,197
Joined: Mar 12 2008
Gold: 51.00
Warn: 10%
Jan 25 2011 09:20am
Quote (Black487 @ Jan 24 2011 05:18pm)
You're wrong and here's why. 

In the U.S. our rights end where the rights of others begins.  In other words, your right to swing your fist ends before my face, and vice versa.  As you smoke you are breaching the personal space of somebody else.

Second hand smoke has been proven to he harmful by overwhelming amounts of evidence.  You can't argue this fact, I just posted a studies where the conclusively found a link between cancer caused by second hand smoke to non-smokers.  The higher the exposure the higher the risk.  But the risk is still present even in infrequent exposures.  Accumulate exposures over time from doorways, sidewalks, establishments that allow smoking, etc and it could pose a risk.  To prove your point, would you willingly expose yourself if only briefly to environments containing asbestos several times a day over your lifetime?  Would you accept that exposure for no apparent reason?


Pretty sure asbestos is a little more dangerous than cigarette smoke. There's no point in arguing because neither of us are going to change our minds.
Member
Posts: 3,967
Joined: Jan 15 2011
Gold: 150.22
Warn: 10%
Jan 25 2011 03:20pm
Passive smoking is far more dangerous ;s
Member
Posts: 440
Joined: Sep 18 2010
Gold: 0.00
Warn: 10%
Jan 25 2011 04:28pm
the massive qualms of smoke destroy the lungs of those around you.
Member
Posts: 15,197
Joined: Mar 12 2008
Gold: 51.00
Warn: 10%
Jan 25 2011 04:52pm
Smoking one cigarette is going to be worse for your lungs than walking into a building that people are smoking outside of hundreds of times. Fact.
Member
Posts: 13,305
Joined: Sep 28 2005
Gold: 4.21
Jan 25 2011 06:37pm
i have a bigger question.

which is worse? normal cigs or menthol? im sure menthol is but i dont know why they would be.
Member
Posts: 15,197
Joined: Mar 12 2008
Gold: 51.00
Warn: 10%
Jan 25 2011 07:21pm
Quote (lone500 @ Jan 25 2011 07:37pm)
i have a bigger question.

which is worse? normal cigs or menthol? im sure menthol is but i dont know why they would be.


It depends on the cigarette.
Member
Posts: 13,305
Joined: Sep 28 2005
Gold: 4.21
Jan 25 2011 07:50pm
Quote (Phisherman @ Jan 26 2011 01:21am)
It depends on the cigarette.


marlboro

Member
Posts: 15,197
Joined: Mar 12 2008
Gold: 51.00
Warn: 10%
Jan 25 2011 07:59pm
Quote (lone500 @ Jan 25 2011 08:50pm)
marlboro


Menthol would be worse. I think menthol cigs are generally more unhealthy but I'm sure there are menthol cigs out there with less chemicals than regular cigarettes.
Member
Posts: 5,628
Joined: May 29 2006
Gold: 5.00
Jan 25 2011 08:17pm
Quote (Phisherman @ Jan 25 2011 07:59pm)
Menthol would be worse.  I think menthol cigs are generally more unhealthy but I'm sure there are menthol cigs out there with less chemicals than regular cigarettes.


As a menthol only smoker im always curious as to why people figure that they are more dangerous. Would you happen to have an explanation?
Member
Posts: 15,197
Joined: Mar 12 2008
Gold: 51.00
Warn: 10%
Jan 25 2011 09:58pm
Quote (Aisu_aS @ Jan 25 2011 09:17pm)
As a menthol only smoker im always curious as to why people figure that they are more dangerous. Would you happen to have an explanation?


From my understanding they tend to have slightly more chemicals in them. It's probably not enough to make a real difference, but I will admit I have not done research on this in years.
Go Back To Science, Technology & Nature Topic List
Prev12345Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll