Quote (lims101 @ Dec 27 2010 02:41am)
As for the brain problem, I reckon you'd be better of getting a completely new brain, with the old memories/knowledge ect stored on a computer chip, then implanting the chip into a new brain. It's well known that the brain is much more malleable when one is younger. Imagine the possibilities if you could implant all your previous knowledge into the (new) brain of a ~3 year old. But I guess if we are talking about computer implants a matrix-like 'downloadable' brain would be an easier option.
Well, they say a genius mathematician's best work is generally finished by the time they turn 25 or 30 because of the aging brain problem. New connections are more difficult to make in the older brain. If we could give our geniuses an infinite supply of youthful brains and allow them to keep their previous memories and knowledge, that'd be AMAZING. The problem, though, is that we'd probably need this technology in order to get people that are intelligent enough to develop this technology.
The rest of your post sounds familiar, too. I had two house mates in undergrad that were biology majors (one's going into ecology, the other's going into cancer research for their PhD's). Sounds like with the degeneration of DNA, it takes a long time to happen but once it does, it propagates for the rest of a person's life. That's why we can have 60-70 fairly youthful years, and then once that degeneration happens, it's never able to correct itself.
Quote (Samapoil @ Dec 27 2010 03:26am)
Because you can't clone a soul.
I hadn't realized we had discovered the soul?
This post was edited by bentherdonethat on Dec 27 2010 10:48am