Quote (Psycho- @ Sep 11 2010 03:34am)
there is still the issue of linking all the counter evidence together into a more credible working big picture. the big bang theory will be replaced but only with something that is pretty complete. im all for better ideas but im not for replacing one with a lot of work into it with something less complete.
What does it matter if one theory is less complete than a wrong theory? If something is wrong, at least in science, it is not acceptable to hang onto that theory just because it is 'more complete'. The big bang is wrong, plasma cosmology is right. Plasma cosmology might not be as complete, but that's only because it doesn't receive mainstream support and hasn't had hundreds of people working to flesh it out.
In plasma cosmology the evidence is linked into a working picture.
This post was edited by AEtheric on Sep 10 2010 09:50pm