So, no balloons yet huh?

Hubbell doesnt investigate the planets in our solar system, that 3 second video clip looks so fake its not even funny - that planet does a near full rotation and remain in perfect full light - such glaring fakery

Infinitely continuous variable transmission and "perfect" geometric solution for power transfer
Based off of the amazing properties of the electromagnetic field.










ez pk

http://www.utaot.com/2014/04/20/tri-lobed-disc-of-sabu-evidence-of-high-tech-in-ancient-egypt/

Ya you were right
I got tricked again.
Same picture, same hoax,
I guess?




NASA is as volatile scientifically as Feynmen
Who can't talk a about magnet without a chair dance & song

Its just distraction because something is up.

have you ever seen this comparison of the visible light on the electromagnetic spectrum spectrum to the audio scale in term of Hz or the vibration of the waves

Except you know, the halves don't line up at all

Juno half is smaller than the other, if you increased the size so it matched up, the band's would no longer match

you missed the point - the pictures are two years apart but they're the exact same perspective, it should tell you something if you really think about it.

You just doing the same thing most people do in Conversation, not listening to what is actually said, and focusing on a small detail to distract and that allows you to dismiss the idea completely.

This post was edited by card_sultan on Jul 11 2016 04:24pm

You think the earth is flat and gravity is a conspiracy, I heard that loud and clear

You're just doing the same thing most people do, not looking at all the pictures of jupiter, just the one that fits your retarded argument
"Hurr durr, this planet looks the exact same as it did 2 years ago"

Guess what, so does Earth

It was an interesting picture, so I did a little research (you guys should try it). Both images/sides are actually from Hubble. I don't know who labeled the left hand side Juno 2016, but that label is wrong.

Yes both pictures are from supposedly from Hubble, the one on the left was just released on video to to increase interest in the arrival of the Juno satellite visiting Jupiter which just happens to have something interesting going in there after a 5 year journey - What a coincidence. Thankfully it arrived at the exact right moment. But what are the odds that two years later Hubble has the exact same angle perspective of Jupiter?
and what time of day does Jupiter have a complete view of the sun with respect to Hubble after both planets have orbited millions of miles? Not that high if the Earth is actually not moving.



Look at this image you can tell the satellite was photographed with a normal- wide focal length lense - look at the pinpoint focus it has though - you think that composite was photographed with the Hubble too at 588 million miles - Wake up .
Without Kubrick - Nasa are just space geeks with no common sense about basic imagery. Actually u can see that the top most solar panel of the satellite is not in focus - which means it had a very very short focal length , it's so obviously staged reality.

And actually you can tell the image had two sources of light - one for the satellite , another for the planet

This post was edited by card_sultan on Jul 11 2016 09:16pm