d2jsp
Log InRegister
d2jsp Forums > Off-Topic > General Chat > Science, Technology & Nature > Science Prevails Over Religion > Evolution
Prev1192021222328Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll
Member
Posts: 112,095
Joined: Jul 25 2008
Gold: 40.42
Jun 19 2009 11:59am
Quote (Lampyrid @ Fri, 19 Jun 2009, 10:57)
Religion is bullshit used for marketing propaganda and scare tactics so the massive legions of retards don't go thinking their way into a rebellion with the government, or what have you.


Oh shit, I didn't realize that you have proof that religion is bullshit, go ahead and post it man.

Or, you know, continue talking out of your ass and making blind assertions that you can't back up with any kind of proof.

Either one works, I can wait. :)
Banned
Posts: 192
Joined: Jun 18 2009
Gold: 76.50
Jun 19 2009 12:00pm
Quote (AiNedeSpelCzech @ Fri, Jun 19 2009, 12:59pm)
Oh shit, I didn't realize that you have proof that religion is bullshit, go ahead and post it man.

Or, you know, continue talking out of your ass and making blind assertions that you can't back up with any kind of proof.

Either one works, I can wait.  :)


Likewise
Member
Posts: 112,095
Joined: Jul 25 2008
Gold: 40.42
Jun 19 2009 12:01pm
Quote (Lampyrid @ Fri, 19 Jun 2009, 11:00)
Likewise


Ah, but you see, all I'm saying is that there's no proof either way. Meanwhile, you are making solid assertions in one direction.

The difference is that saying it should be an agnostic question and people should acknowledge that they can't definitively know in either direction is nothing but a solid fact. This is backed up by the fact that there are no proofs that God does or does not exist. :)

Nice try at dodging by failing to understand my point, though. Big ups.
Banned
Posts: 192
Joined: Jun 18 2009
Gold: 76.50
Jun 19 2009 12:03pm
Quote (AiNedeSpelCzech @ Fri, Jun 19 2009, 01:01pm)
Ah, but you see, all I'm saying is that there's no proof either way.  Meanwhile, you are making solid assertions in one direction.

The difference is that saying it should be an agnostic question and people should acknowledge that they can't definitively know in either direction is nothing but a solid fact.  This is backed up by the fact that there are no proofs that God does or does not exist.  :)

Nice try at dodging by failing to understand my point, though.  Big ups.


I understand your point completely...I was bashing religion, not whether or not a god exists.
Member
Posts: 112,095
Joined: Jul 25 2008
Gold: 40.42
Jun 19 2009 12:05pm
Quote (Lampyrid @ Fri, 19 Jun 2009, 11:03)
I understand your point completely...I was bashing religion, not whether or not a god exists.


Except religions are centered around the idea of a God and you have absolutely no proof that any of -them- are false, either. :(

Oopsie daisy. :(
Banned
Posts: 192
Joined: Jun 18 2009
Gold: 76.50
Jun 19 2009 12:06pm
Quote (AiNedeSpelCzech @ Fri, Jun 19 2009, 01:05pm)
Except religions are centered around the idea of a God and you have absolutely no proof that any of -them- are false, either.  :( 

Oopsie daisy.  :(


Then I suggest opening your eyes a bit more and making your own observations. It is a great scare tactic! Why wouldn't the government flaunt it?
Member
Posts: 112,095
Joined: Jul 25 2008
Gold: 40.42
Jun 19 2009 12:10pm
Quote (Lampyrid @ Fri, 19 Jun 2009, 11:06)
Then I suggest opening your eyes a bit more and making your own observations.  It is a great scare tactic!  Why wouldn't the government flaunt it?


I hear that you can beat people over the head with rocks and kill them.

This proves that rocks were invented and fabricated by the government so that they can control and kill people.

When I put it that way, can you see the flaw in your cleverly crafted argument? Just because the government can use something to control people doesn't mean that they invented it.
Banned
Posts: 192
Joined: Jun 18 2009
Gold: 76.50
Jun 19 2009 12:14pm
Quote (AiNedeSpelCzech @ Fri, Jun 19 2009, 01:10pm)
I hear that you can beat people over the head with rocks and kill them.

This proves that rocks were invented and fabricated by the government so that they can control and kill people. 

When I put it that way, can you see the flaw in your cleverly crafted argument?  Just because the government can use something to control people doesn't mean that they invented it.


LOL
Member
Posts: 112,095
Joined: Jul 25 2008
Gold: 40.42
Jun 19 2009 12:16pm
Quote (Lampyrid @ Fri, 19 Jun 2009, 11:14)
LOL


Ah, the classic "I have been pushed into a corner by your incredible logic but don't want to admit it so I'll just LOL" tactic. I'm used to that one, kid.

Just chew it over and don't bother replying. Think about the fact that religion could be true despite the fact that governments have used it for control.

Either that, or bury your head in the sand, ignore logic, and then go around bragging about how science is so much more correct than religion. :D
Member
Posts: 18,432
Joined: Jun 22 2007
Gold: 0.00
Jun 19 2009 12:20pm
Quote (AiNedeSpelCzech @ Fri, Jun 19 2009, 10:16am)
Ah, the classic "I have been pushed into a corner by your incredible logic but don't want to admit it so I'll just LOL" tactic.  I'm used to that one, kid.

Just chew it over and don't bother replying.  Think about the fact that religion could be true despite the fact that governments have used it for control. 

Either that, or bury your head in the sand, ignore logic, and then go around bragging about how science is so much more correct than religion.  :D


Go Back To Science, Technology & Nature Topic List
Prev1192021222328Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll