d2jsp
Log InRegister
d2jsp Forums > Off-Topic > General Chat > Science, Technology & Nature >
Poll > The Case For Electromagnetic Universe > + Other Heresy Against The Establishment
Prev1234562Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll
  Guests cannot view or vote in polls. Please register or login.
Member
Posts: 64,732
Joined: Oct 25 2006
Gold: 260.11
Jun 16 2016 07:58pm
Quote (MaliceMizer @ Jun 16 2016 03:21pm)
The word magnet comes from magic, or perhaps the other way around.
The relationship of magneto-dielectricity is mandatory for understand magnetism and the nature of how electrification operates in the creation of a magnet.


Magnetism: spacial, circulatory, radiative, polarized, both centrifugal & centripetal

dielectric: inertial, centripetal, counterspacial, radial; magnetic fieldal radiation, and dielectric generation,
or inertia.


http://i.imgur.com/d77jnjk.png


Electrified: full of electric fluid charge by supporting medium. Energy does not exist physically, but is the "do work", which is equal to "force over time".
The word "energy" is a convenient fiction, like "time"


Dielectric object: The permanent magnet is an electrically charged dielectric object, but that dielectricity is counterspatial, inertial, radial, and
centripetal. All such permanent magnets have magnetism as secondary attributes to their electrification.
These are moved about in a strict accordance to cause and effect.




http://pondscienceinstitute.on-rev.com/imageswiki/Torus-Math.jpg

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mduGLBxISb0


You need to explain these things in lay speak. That's the first step to proving you yourself understand it.

This post was edited by Thor123422 on Jun 16 2016 07:59pm
Member
Posts: 53,600
Joined: Jun 5 2006
Gold: 14,588.33
Jun 17 2016 12:58am
when you publish your theory of youtube videos keep my picture there so I may leech off your great glory
Member
Posts: 64,732
Joined: Oct 25 2006
Gold: 260.11
Jun 17 2016 01:14am
If you can't explain a concept in simple English there's around a 99% chance you're just spewing bullshit. After reread your response it's basically all gibberish with no specifics, just generalities and undefined terms.
Member
Posts: 14,099
Joined: Jul 13 2006
Gold: 83.30
Jun 17 2016 01:43am
Quote (MaliceMizer @ Jun 16 2016 09:29pm)
This shit ain't easy cuz I R dum dum flat brain.

http://i.imgur.com/sPBuw4e.jpg
http://i.imgur.com/PzK56uA.jpg


Oh wait no, the garbage is obsolete. Lorentz is garbage, he measured the torus the same all the way across. Help me build a new one smrty pantz cuz centrifugal and centripetal.



or do you need my credentials too


Sorry my friend but whilst your answer to a is correct, your answer to b makes zero sense. Determine means you need to get both the direction of the field vector and the magnitude.

It's easily done using the curl of the H-field.
Member
Posts: 13,231
Joined: Feb 1 2010
Gold: 4.77
Jun 17 2016 01:53am
Quote (Thor123422 @ 16 Jun 2016 20:58)
You need to explain these things in lay speak. That's the first step to proving you yourself understand it.



It started in layman, because I had to understand it before I could describe it, let alone explain it.
Science fiction always precedes science


Contrary to common belief, opposites do not attract.
Like attracts like, and opposites repel. Dielectricity repels magnetism and vice versa.







Electrification of a pre-"magnet" charges the do work of dielectricity, which rolls the orbit of magnetism along in a
mechanical vortex.
However unlike our pre-"magnet," which eventually looses it's charge, the permanent magic I mean magnet has a
perpetually unwinding-self-winding mainspring.
How can it self-wind while at the same time unwinding?
Nature does not move against itself like fire distinguishing water.
Greater pressures override lesser ones and conjugate reciprocation is endless in this universe, both in macro and micro.
Therefore an absolute knowledge of the magnet is key to understanding not only perpetual motion & the key to free energy, but also most likely the TRUE origin of our ever expanding universe



Member
Posts: 13,231
Joined: Feb 1 2010
Gold: 4.77
Jun 17 2016 02:04am
Quote (balrog66 @ 17 Jun 2016 02:43)
Sorry my friend but whilst your answer to a is correct, your answer to b makes zero sense. Determine means you need to get both the direction of the field vector and the magnitude.

It's easily done using the curl of the H-field.


My contention is obviously that the h field is wrong.




Member
Posts: 64,732
Joined: Oct 25 2006
Gold: 260.11
Jun 17 2016 02:05am
Still aren't actually explaining anything. Start with actual definitions of your terms because you aren't using them in any sense that would be recognized by somebody that has actually studied physics.
Member
Posts: 53,600
Joined: Jun 5 2006
Gold: 14,588.33
Jun 17 2016 02:26am
Quote (MaliceMizer @ Jun 16 2016 11:53pm)
It started in layman, because I had to understand it before I could describe it, let alone explain it.
Science fiction always precedes science


Contrary to common belief, opposites do not attract.
Like attracts like, and opposites repel. Dielectricity repels magnetism and vice versa.

http://www.light-weaver.com/vortex/images/torus1.gif



http://i.imgur.com/fUNtiA1.png

Electrification of a pre-"magnet" charges the do work of dielectricity, which rolls the orbit of magnetism along in a
mechanical vortex.
However unlike our pre-"magnet," which eventually looses it's charge, the permanent magic I mean magnet has a
perpetually unwinding-self-winding mainspring.
How can it self-wind while at the same time unwinding?
Nature does not move against itself like fire distinguishing water.
Greater pressures override lesser ones and conjugate reciprocation is endless in this universe, both in macro and micro.
Therefore an absolute knowledge of the magnet is key to understanding not only perpetual motion & the key to free energy, but also most likely the TRUE origin of our ever expanding universe


http://i.imgur.com/V2De2dl.png


minecraft is gr8 evidence

care to explain what you mean by " conjugate reciprocation is endless in this universe" ?
Member
Posts: 13,231
Joined: Feb 1 2010
Gold: 4.77
Jun 17 2016 02:37am
Quote (Thor123422 @ 17 Jun 2016 03:05)
Still aren't actually explaining anything. Start with actual definitions of your terms because you aren't using them in any sense that would be recognized by somebody that has actually studied physics.



Your astropriest Neil T gives you descriptions & I give you tangibility but you still contend I should explain the entire reality by definitions?
I'll only dance your monkey so long before you have to address my points instead of masquerade behind semantics in language.












Obviously I'm dividing two sides of the same coin, where a confusion MIGHT OCCUR in terminology, but you as a supposed student of physics should be rejoicing such profound simplifications. Instead you blindly turn up your nose in your bandwagoning fallacious assertions.


This post was edited by MaliceMizer on Jun 17 2016 02:46am
Member
Posts: 13,231
Joined: Feb 1 2010
Gold: 4.77
Jun 17 2016 03:32am
Quote (majorblood @ 17 Jun 2016 03:26)
minecraft is gr8 evidence

care to explain what you mean by " conjugate reciprocation is endless in this universe" ?



Biologically & gender implied mounting and dismounting of particles all the way up to galaxies I might surmise.
To say it's endless is undeniably an unfounded assumption, especially since most Field Theorists believe in a supersymmetry which would probably manifest to show very finite. Perhaps I may have been projecting my faith in divinity on that one.
Go Back To Science, Technology & Nature Topic List
Prev1234562Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll