d2jsp
Log InRegister
d2jsp Forums > Off-Topic > General Chat > Science, Technology & Nature >
Poll > Chemtrails Or Contrails > Will Post Latest Proof In A You Tube.
Prev123459Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll
  Guests cannot view or vote in polls. Please register or login.
Member
Posts: 10,812
Joined: Oct 15 2009
Gold: Locked
Warn: 20%
Jul 31 2013 10:17pm
Quote (doomchaser @ Jul 31 2013 08:55pm)
UVB – the most lethal form of UV radiation

UVC is worse than UVB, basic math dude.


Just give us the source for the 1400%

Member
Posts: 17,045
Joined: Jan 29 2007
Gold: 5,964.43
Jul 31 2013 10:20pm
Quote (Azrad @ Jul 31 2013 09:17pm)
UVC is worse than UVB, basic math dude.


Just give us the source for the 1400%


From Harvard Magazine
Harvard scientist
The Science paper notes that loss of ice in the Artic threatens to release significant amounts of carbon dioxide and methane from the soils of Siberia and Northern Alaska, potentially accelerating climate change
this stuff is not posted classified information they can just warn you stay out of the sun.
Member
Posts: 10,812
Joined: Oct 15 2009
Gold: Locked
Warn: 20%
Jul 31 2013 10:25pm
Quote (doomchaser @ Jul 31 2013 09:20pm)
From Harvard Magazine
Harvard scientist
The Science paper notes that loss of ice in the Artic threatens to release significant amounts of carbon dioxide and methane from the soils of Siberia and Northern Alaska, potentially accelerating climate change
this stuff is not posted classified information they can just warn you stay out of the sun.


book, chapter, verse please?

Because I think you're lying.

I did some digging and I found the source for the claim, and I don't think what you said is it.

This post was edited by Azrad on Jul 31 2013 10:26pm
Member
Posts: 28,331
Joined: Jun 9 2007
Gold: 11,700.00
Jul 31 2013 10:26pm
Quote (doomchaser @ 1 Aug 2013 04:20)
From Harvard Magazine
Harvard scientist
The Science paper notes that loss of ice in the Artic threatens to release significant amounts of carbon dioxide and methane from the soils of Siberia and Northern Alaska, potentially accelerating climate change
this stuff is not posted classified information they can just warn you stay out of the sun.


can i assume "not posted = classified" ? because "not posted (as) classified" doesn't make sense - just confirm

but since when does UV come out of the ground?
please show the catalytic relationship which causes above to increase UV exposure, if there is any at all that is

Quote (Azrad @ 1 Aug 2013 04:25)
...
I did some digging and I found the source for the claim...


what is the title of the youtube?
or does it come from the scientific archives or patriot university?

This post was edited by brmv on Jul 31 2013 10:28pm
Member
Posts: 10,812
Joined: Oct 15 2009
Gold: Locked
Warn: 20%
Jul 31 2013 10:29pm
i pm'ed. I'm not allowed to post links in forums.
google "Dane Wigington ~ Geoengineering Is Destroying The Ozone Layer"

This post was edited by Azrad on Jul 31 2013 10:31pm
Member
Posts: 55,374
Joined: Mar 6 2006
Gold: 220.48
Jul 31 2013 10:31pm
It's from the harvardmagazine website, from 2012 and has nothing to do with what he's asserting, but that certainly doesn't stop him from parroting something said by someone else who made that terrible leap of logic. I find it funny that they won't even mention James G. Anderson's name, despite being the one who led the group that they're sourcing, albeit incorrectly.

By the way, UBV is not the most lethal, not even remotely. UBV causes mostly superficial damage while UVA penetrates the skin.

And yes azrad, you found what he's quoting, but the source they're quoting is from an article that has nothing to do with the subject he's babbling about.

This post was edited by Arsenic_Touch on Jul 31 2013 10:41pm
Member
Posts: 17,045
Joined: Jan 29 2007
Gold: 5,964.43
Jul 31 2013 10:38pm
Quote (Azrad @ Jul 31 2013 09:25pm)
book, chapter, verse please?


Dude you can find anything if i can lol ... i posted all the government links i use 1 time or another free information..they shut down HAARP site . sometimes the truth is not what is said, but what is not said.
“Ozone depletion would cause more UV radiation which would cause skin cancers – killing people,” he said.
“We know the mechanism for this, because it’s the process that affects the Antarctic ozone hole.”
Source: ABC Rural | 27/Sep/2011
– See more at: http://ep.yimg.com/ty/cdn/realityzone/UFNscientistOpposesGeoengineering.html#sthash.neDLCzuY.dpuf
More references,
geoengineering destroys the ozone layer http://www.geoengineeringwatch.org/geoengineering-programs-continue-to-destroy-ozone-layer/ http://www.prisonplanet.com/geoengineering-chemtrails-shredding-ozone-layer-daily-putting-all-life-on-earth-at-risk.html http://www.thomhartmann.com/forum/2012/07/professor-geo-engineering-climate-change-solution-would-destroy-ozone-layer-and-kill-p
6th mass extinction is now http://www.mysterium.com/extinction.html http://www.actionbioscience.org/newfrontiers/eldredge2.html
No ozone layer, no terrestrial life on earth http://www.theozonehole.com/atmosphere.htm
UV resistant genetically modified crops http://www.academia.edu/171138/
Countering_UV-B_stress_in_plants_Does_selenium_have_a_role Global aerosol depth loop (off course this source does not mention the main source of atmospheric aerosols, global geoengineering) http://earthobservatory.nasa.gov/GlobalMaps/view.php?d1=MODAL2_M_AER_OD
From a recent science study on excessive UV. Although UV-B is only a minor component of the total solar radiation (less than 0.5%), due to its high energy, its potential for causing biological damage is exceptionally high and even small increases could lead to significant biological damage.
Excessive UV effects on phytoplankton. http://www.photobiology.info/Hader.html
Human health and ecological consequences of ozone depletion. http://eesc.columbia.edu/courses/v1003/lectures/ozone_health/
Excessive UV effects on ecosystems http://www.grida.no/publications/vg/ozone/page/1389.aspx
Excessive UV effects plant development/growth http://www.agriculturejournals.cz/publicFiles/52840.pdf
Excessive UV effects plant growth http://www.ehow.com/how-does_5525557_effects-radiation-plant-growth-development.html Excessive UV and plant growth http://zebu.uoregon.edu/text/UV
Excessive UV and plant growth http://www.google.com/#q=excessive+uv+affects+plant+respiration&spell=1&sa=X&ei=GkXtUcLdCYrgyQGRnoHgDQ&ved=0CCgQBSgA&bav=on.2,or.r_qf.&bvm=bv.49478099%2Cd.aWM%2Cpv.xjs.s.en_US.c75bKy5EQ0A.O&fp=fc20d2414f75fc3c&biw=1442&bih=874
Plankton produces 50% of earths oxygen http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2004/06/0607_040607_phytoplankton.html
Plankton populations down 40% http://www.scientificamerican.com/article.cfm?id=phytoplankton-population
Member
Posts: 28,331
Joined: Jun 9 2007
Gold: 11,700.00
Jul 31 2013 10:52pm
Quote (Arsenic_Touch @ 1 Aug 2013 04:31)
... that terrible leap of logic. ... has nothing to do with the subject ...


aren't those the essential characteristics needed to ensure that a (non-music) youtube goes viral?
Member
Posts: 17,045
Joined: Jan 29 2007
Gold: 5,964.43
Jul 31 2013 10:58pm
Quote (Arsenic_Touch @ Jul 31 2013 09:31pm)
It's from the harvardmagazine website, from 2012 and has nothing to do with what he's asserting, but that certainly doesn't stop him from parroting something said by someone else who made that terrible leap of logic. I find it funny that they won't even mention James G. Anderson's name, despite being the one who led the group that they're sourcing, albeit incorrectly.

By the way, UBV is not the most lethal, not even remotely. UBV causes mostly superficial damage while UVA penetrates the skin.

And yes azrad, you found what he's quoting, but the source they're quoting is from an article that has nothing to do with the subject he's babbling about.


. you guys know a lot but when i start showing things and giving legit links you run . or teach me things you know so little about. claim i qouting something...Azrad admits they spray and calls it chaff...i give them reason's why they spray for other then radar, they claim I quote something and do not know what is happening in the world..ok soo i posted real links and they avoid them....they just want disagree with a you tube because it is you tube lol

This post was edited by doomchaser on Jul 31 2013 11:09pm
Member
Posts: 10,812
Joined: Oct 15 2009
Gold: Locked
Warn: 20%
Jul 31 2013 11:40pm
Quote (doomchaser @ Jul 31 2013 09:38pm)
“Ozone depletion would cause more UV radiation which would cause skin cancers – killing people,” he said.
“We know the mechanism for this, because it’s the process that affects the Antarctic ozone hole.”
Source: ABC Rural | 27/Sep/2011

Quote does not address claim of 1400%.


Quote (doomchaser @ Jul 31 2013 09:38pm)
-omitted.com/ty/cdn/realityzone/UFNscientistOpposesGeoengineering.html#sthash.neDLCzuY.dpuf
LOL a webforum! Also does not address claim of 1400%.

Quote (doomchaser @ Jul 31 2013 09:38pm)
More references,
-omitted.org/geoengineering-programs-continue-to-destroy-ozone-layer/
Quote does not address claim of 1400%.

Quote (doomchaser @ Jul 31 2013 09:38pm)
-omitted.com/geoengineering-chemtrails-shredding-ozone-layer-daily-putting-all-life-on-earth-at-risk.html[/URL]
Alex Jones URL, did not click.

Quote (doomchaser @ Jul 31 2013 09:38pm)
-omitted.com/forum/2012/07/professor-geo-engineering-climate-change-solution-would-destroy-ozone-layer-and-kill-p
Another webforum, also does not address claim of 1400%



you're 0/4... how many more should I go though?

This post was edited by Azrad on Jul 31 2013 11:41pm
Go Back To Science, Technology & Nature Topic List
Prev123459Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll