d2jsp
Log InRegister
d2jsp Forums > Off-Topic > General Chat > Science, Technology & Nature >
Poll > Cambrian Explosion's Cause? > Lets See Your Opinions
Prev12345Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll
  Guests cannot view or vote in polls. Please register or login.
Member
Posts: 40,915
Joined: Jul 8 2009
Gold: 0.00
Dec 22 2011 09:08pm
Unexplainable?

Sir... You need to do some reading.

Evolution is a pretty healthy bit of science.
Member
Posts: 9,764
Joined: Oct 9 2010
Gold: 125.02
Dec 22 2011 09:15pm
Edit

This post was edited by Torm1 on Dec 22 2011 09:16pm
Member
Posts: 1,039
Joined: Oct 21 2011
Gold: 155.85
Dec 22 2011 09:21pm
Quote (piddywiffle @ Dec 22 2011 10:08pm)
Unexplainable?

Sir... You need to do some reading.

Evolution is a pretty healthy bit of science.


Lol I know exactly what evolution is, but if you have done your own reading you would know that the evolution that occurred in the Cambrian Explosion cannot be explained so easily.
Member
Posts: 30,861
Joined: May 24 2006
Gold: 15,017.54
Dec 23 2011 12:07am
Quote (DisLeader @ Dec 22 2011 01:17am)
Actually that kind of view is completely justified, because that would be exactly how he worked. He's been around since before the beginning of time, I think he can take a few million years to create some new and bizarre life.



I actually find it funny now-a-days trying to convince myself otherwise that there is no God. I actually do try but it never works for me, because I'm reminded of the atheist scientists and professors that now say there was an "impersonal force" behind the big bang and the creation of the universe. Basically their saying that the universe is too organized to have been randomly created. They will call God an "impersonal force" simply because they do not believe in Him. Don't think me a religious fanatic preaching, I do not go to church. I simply find it hard to not believe in Him anymore.


Except the earth is only 6000 years old according to the bible
Weird how you pick and choose what to believe
Member
Posts: 42,313
Joined: Apr 2 2008
Gold: 90.65
Warn: 50%
Dec 23 2011 01:12am
Quote (DisLeader @ Dec 23 2011 06:31am)
The universe was created by the Big Bang of course, but I see where you are coming from. I guess the best answer is that no one knows what exactly created Him, some will even argue that He has always been. If you think about it really, He has since time did not exist before the Big Bang. And he definitely was the cause of the Big Bang no question, its simply scientifically impossible to shove all the matter that makes up the entire universe into this period.


the universe was not "created " by the "big bang "
the inflation was just that , inflation ( and still is )

and to say its scientifically impossible to have all the universes matter condensed into a singularity .....
you do realize that is exactly what the scientific community believes
Member
Posts: 1,039
Joined: Oct 21 2011
Gold: 155.85
Dec 23 2011 01:22am
Quote (Queso @ Dec 23 2011 01:07am)
Except the earth is only 6000 years old according to the bible
Weird how you pick and choose what to believe


The people that started that nonsense was proven wrong a long time ago and nobody with a brain still believes that.
/e Side note, I do not read the bible.

Quote (Matao @ Dec 23 2011 02:12am)
the universe was not "created " by the  "big bang "
the inflation was just that , inflation ( and still is )

and to say its scientifically impossible to have all the universes matter condensed into a singularity .....
you do realize that is exactly what the scientific community believes


It is true that all the matter was condensed into a singularity, that is a fact. I guess what I meant to say is that they cannot explain the Big Bang scientifically because just how did all that matter get shoved into . that size in the first place?

/e According to a naive interpretation of general relativity that ignores quantum mechanics, the initial state of the universe, at the beginning of the Big Bang, was a singularity. Both General Relativity and Quantum Mechanics break down in describing the Big Bang, but in general quantum mechanics does not permit particles to inhabit a space smaller than their wavelengths. Sounds pretty unexplainable to me.

This post was edited by DisLeader on Dec 23 2011 01:33am
Member
Posts: 42,313
Joined: Apr 2 2008
Gold: 90.65
Warn: 50%
Dec 23 2011 02:07am
Quote (DisLeader @ Dec 23 2011 07:22pm)
The people that started that nonsense was proven wrong a long time ago and nobody with a brain still believes that.
/e Side note, I do not read the bible.



It is true that all the matter was condensed into a singularity, that is a fact. I guess what I meant to say is that they cannot explain the Big Bang scientifically because just how did all that matter get shoved into . that size in the first place?

/e According to a naive interpretation of general relativity that ignores quantum mechanics, the initial state of the universe, at the beginning of the Big Bang, was a singularity. Both General Relativity and Quantum Mechanics break down in describing the Big Bang, but in general quantum mechanics does not permit particles to inhabit a space smaller than their wavelengths. Sounds pretty unexplainable to me.


you're simply not making any sense ,that i can see
space smaller than a wavelength ?
all of space , from one edge of our universe to the other , was the singularity .....

the inflation (big bang ) is space itself expanding
as it continues to do to this day

not to mention very simple ideas , such as the 4 forces were once united , and split as the universe inflated ( as the volume of the universe increased as the space feild inflated )
physics as we know it simply didnt exist in the singularity .....
Member
Posts: 1,039
Joined: Oct 21 2011
Gold: 155.85
Dec 23 2011 02:14am
Quote (Matao @ Dec 23 2011 03:07am)
you're simply not making any sense  ,that i can see
space smaller than a wavelength ?
all of space , from one edge of our universe to the other , was the singularity .....

the inflation  (big bang ) is space itself expanding
as it continues to do to this day

not to mention very simple ideas  , such as the 4 forces were once united , and split as the universe inflated ( as the volume of the universe increased as the space feild inflated )
physics as we know it simply didnt exist in the singularity .....


I'm not making any sense? Here. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gravitational_singularity Pay close attention to when they start talking about the two different kind of singularities.
Member
Posts: 42,313
Joined: Apr 2 2008
Gold: 90.65
Warn: 50%
Dec 23 2011 02:26am
Quote (DisLeader @ Dec 23 2011 08:14pm)
I'm not making any sense? Here. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gravitational_singularity Pay close attention to when they start talking about the two different kind of singularities.


ill copy/paste this bit , and hopefully you will understand what it means

The two most important types of spacetime singularities are curvature singularities and conical singularities.

this doesnt state that there are only 2 types

you are losing your way in definitions
instead of reading a few wiki pages , why dont you actually do some study on the subject

there is a vast difference between a singularity that exists inside space , with more space outside of it
and the original state of the universe , which had absolutely no space outside of it at all
but rather contained all of space itself
Member
Posts: 2,162
Joined: Oct 8 2009
Gold: 5.00
Dec 23 2011 02:44am
A person whom has thoroughly researched this will most certainly not come to the conclusion that a deity did it.
Go Back To Science, Technology & Nature Topic List
Prev12345Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll