d2jsp
Log InRegister
d2jsp Forums > Off-Topic > General Chat > Science, Technology & Nature > Climate Change Question > Is There (scientific) Proof Against It?
Prev123
Add Reply New Topic New Poll
Member
Posts: 4,248
Joined: Oct 5 2010
Gold: 1,995.00
Jul 2 2011 01:35pm
Quote (Paran0id @ Jul 2 2011 12:48am)
Climate change is unquestionable. The earth's climate has never been static.
However, the claim that humans are the cause for climate change is total bullshit.


Your lack of the knowledge of greenhouse gases is staggering. Google the Greenhouse Effect, it's all there. And we pump these gases into the atmosphere. How is there any doubt that we are cause of global warming?
Member
Posts: 42,313
Joined: Apr 2 2008
Gold: 90.65
Warn: 50%
Jul 2 2011 01:37pm
Quote (Thandrend @ Jul 3 2011 07:35am)
Your lack of the knowledge of greenhouse gases is staggering. Google the Greenhouse Effect, it's all there. And we pump these gases into the atmosphere. How is there any doubt that we are cause of global warming?


the power of propaganda .....
Member
Posts: 4,248
Joined: Oct 5 2010
Gold: 1,995.00
Jul 2 2011 01:40pm
Quote (Matao @ Jul 2 2011 03:37pm)
the power of propaganda .....


Propaganda only works on weak-minded fools.

The world, does of course, go through climate changes on its own, but you look at ice ages and you notice their frequency are many thousand years apart minus the little ice age a thousand years ago. But to think we have no negative effect on our atmosphere by pumping billions of pounds of CO2 into it, that's just stupidity.

Member
Posts: 42,313
Joined: Apr 2 2008
Gold: 90.65
Warn: 50%
Jul 2 2011 01:46pm
Quote (Thandrend @ Jul 3 2011 07:40am)
Propaganda only works on weak-minded fools.

The world, does of course, go through climate changes on its own, but you look at ice ages and you notice their frequency are many thousand years apart minus the little ice age a thousand years ago. But to think we have no negative effect on our atmosphere by pumping billions of pounds of CO2 into it, that's just stupidity.


indoctrination is a proven and powerful thing , and often intellect has little bearing on it ( in other words , your intellect , or lack of it , is not a good indicator of whether you have been indoctrinated or not )
but if you can give me a better reason why people believe " climate change " isnt affected to a huge degree by humans , feel free to share it :)

This post was edited by Matao on Jul 2 2011 01:46pm
Member
Posts: 9,764
Joined: Oct 9 2010
Gold: 125.02
Jul 2 2011 02:06pm
Seen the climate lately?

Seen the weather?
Member
Posts: 7,865
Joined: May 3 2007
Gold: 1,337.31
Jul 3 2011 05:16am
H.A.A.R.P.
Member
Posts: 6,869
Joined: Jan 26 2008
Gold: 18,869.00
Jul 3 2011 07:26am
Quote (moKS @ Jul 3 2011 06:16am)
H.A.A.R.P.


Ha ha ha....... Conspiricy theories are fun :)

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/High_Frequency_Active_Auroral_Research_Program

Facts are better......
Member
Posts: 31,223
Joined: May 16 2008
Gold: 178.48
Jul 3 2011 09:58am
the correlation between sunspots on the sun and changes in weather is 100000x closer then rate of increase in carbon and increase in temp.

http://ossfoundation.us/projects/environment/global-warming/solar/overview/image

the factor of CO2 being the major factor in global warming is utter shit, stop being pig headed morons.
Member
Posts: 50,168
Joined: Mar 19 2006
Gold: 4,071.19
Jul 5 2011 04:14pm
lol start polluting now if you want to stop global warming
http://www.reuters.com/article/comments/idUSTRE7634IQ20110704

the "scientists" are grasping at straws trying to find a reason why it has not warmed in the last 10+ years despite co2 still rising during that period


Member
Posts: 11,264
Joined: Sep 8 2006
Gold: 0.00
Jul 6 2011 10:58pm
Quote (Gannon @ Jul 3 2011 03:58pm)
the correlation between sunspots on the sun and changes in weather is 100000x closer then rate of increase in carbon and increase in temp.

http://ossfoundation.us/projects/environment/global-warming/solar/overview/image

the factor of CO2 being the major factor in global warming is utter shit, stop being pig headed morons.


The link isn't clear at all, and the graph actually seems to show a closer resemblence of CO2 and Temperature than Temperature and the sun. You're also putting your chips in, on a climate/geologically related topic, on a graph stretching back 140 years.

Quote (low-ki @ Jul 5 2011 10:14pm)
lol start polluting now if you want to stop global warming
http://www.reuters.com/article/comments/idUSTRE7634IQ20110704

the "scientists" are grasping at straws trying to find a reason why it has not warmed in the last 10+ years despite co2 still rising during that period


Sulphur cools the atmosphere. That's why you can get volcanic winters, for example. The only problem is that sulphur is usually produced in concert with CO2 - and sulphur doesn't stay in the air remotely as long as other greenhouse gases.

I'll paste in this gfx.

Now ask yourself: is it more reasonable to believe that the rising temperature dictates the levels of greenhouse gases, or that the greenhouse gases dictate the temperature? This is besides all of the other, complete data we have.




This post was edited by Interesting on Jul 6 2011 11:11pm
Go Back To Science, Technology & Nature Topic List
Prev123
Add Reply New Topic New Poll