thats like saying a car is a car. or a religion is a religion. its plain ignorance. anyone who believes a scientific theory is the same as a non-scientific theory is ignorant to how basic science works.

Your incompetence resorts to calling the one who slammed you, ignorant. lol'd.

lmao. not my fault you dwell on the word theory instead on the scientific part. you don't understand any of it therefore you consider it faulty. go get an education.

???

thats because a car IS a car whether it be Mitsubishi or Ford lol...

the argument is that a theory, or a possibility in the most simple term, has the same meaning whether it be scientific or "normal"




So what your saying is just because it's a scientific theory, it's true. No matter what? A theory is something UNPROVEN. Meaning believing in theories is the same as believing in a God. So telling someone believing in a God is wrong when you believe in these theories is just hypocritical.

This post was edited by Chinlc on Jun 5 2010 04:33pm

a scientific theory is empirical

and a person is a person right? being close minded gets you nowhere.

read the up above edit on my last post.

You are saying nothing. You are going in circles because you know you are wrong.

why do you continue to state pointless things instead of just addressing the differences between the modern day use of "theory" and "scientific theory" with sources.

i would but i don't give a fuck and this whole discussion is off point

So you're saying the theory of relativity is empirical?

Edit: nevermind I was thinking of a different definition for empirical :PP

This post was edited by Chinlc on Jun 5 2010 04:36pm

Noun 1. scientific theory - a theory that explains scientific observations; "scientific theories must be falsifiable"

Okay, we now know what a scientific theory is. . . HOLY SHIT WHERE DID THAT COME FROM?!?!