d2jsp
Log InRegister
d2jsp Forums > Off-Topic > General Chat > Science, Technology & Nature > Humans Evolving > Do You Think We Still Are?
Prev1234511Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll
Banned
Posts: 1,424
Joined: Apr 29 2006
Gold: 251.05
Warn: 30%
Jan 18 2010 05:06pm
Quote (juliusjuice @ Jan 18 2010 10:28pm)
you are right, de-evolution does not exist.  adaptation arises from natural selection of forms best suited to the environment. our society is becoming less and less dependant on manual labor and are becoming very accostomed to convenience. though any time a species' biology changes it is considered evolution, this doesnt necessarily mean it is a good thing. ever seen idiocracy?


De-evolution is evolution as well.

To ZvLoD: These individuals do not indicate evolution. They're absolutely not significant because they are only individuals, and their difference is way too big. Evolution makes extremely small changes every generation, which aren't even measurable.

Also, evolution only happens when it will make your chance of surviving bigger. Being able to draw extremely detailed pictures, or to memorize 1000 digits of pi, will not make increase your survivability. Hence, this is not part of evolution.
Member
Posts: 9,039
Joined: Nov 16 2009
Gold: 581.50
Warn: 10%
Jan 18 2010 06:08pm
Quote (hk_nobody @ Jan 17 2010 02:59am)
you know China only allow 1 children per couple right? there is no free education/social benefits after the first child. thus most poor chinese family only have 1 kid.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/One-child_policy


That doesn't work for the Chinese in countries other than China :( Each day I see more and more of that yellow shit -.-
Member
Posts: 9,692
Joined: Apr 10 2006
Gold: 19,597.59
Jan 18 2010 09:05pm
Quote (Uytendaaltje @ Jan 18 2010 06:06pm)
De-evolution is evolution as well.

To ZvLoD: These individuals do not indicate evolution. They're absolutely not significant because they are only individuals, and their difference is way too big. Evolution makes extremely small changes every generation, which aren't even measurable.

Also, evolution only happens when it will make your chance of surviving bigger. Being able to draw extremely detailed pictures, or to memorize 1000 digits of pi, will not make increase your survivability. Hence, this is not part of evolution.


i think our definitions are different. de-evolution is when something goes backward, meaning homo sapien would go back to homo erectus. this doesnt happen.

evolution is all about mating. in the past you would have to be alive to mate, the weak (dead) persons genes were lost because they never lived to breed. nowadays we breed with hot people, not smart people. this is going to eventually fuck things up.

there are already countless examples of evolution being harmful to humans. look at alzheimers for instance. thsi is something that could have been eradicated if our ancestors hadnt mated while young (before the unwanted disease takes root). if they mated with older companions (of age where if the disease would have taken effect it would be showing by then) there might be no alzheimers. late blooming problematic mutations arent factored in to evolution because of this.

even hear about turtles that live for centuries? they also mate at all ages, helping to rid their gene pool of unwanted disease and defect.

This post was edited by juliusjuice on Jan 18 2010 09:07pm
Member
Posts: 9,899
Joined: May 7 2006
Gold: 550.00
Jan 18 2010 11:07pm
Quote (Uytendaaltje @ Jan 18 2010 06:06pm)
Also, evolution only happens when it will make your chance of surviving bigger.


False. Genetic drift.

This post was edited by Sioux on Jan 18 2010 11:08pm
Banned
Posts: 1,424
Joined: Apr 29 2006
Gold: 251.05
Warn: 30%
Jan 19 2010 07:55pm
Quote (juliusjuice @ Jan 19 2010 04:05am)
i think our definitions are different. de-evolution is when something goes backward, meaning homo sapien would go back to homo erectus. this doesnt happen.

evolution is all about mating. in the past you would have to be alive to mate, the weak (dead) persons genes were lost because they never lived to breed. nowadays we breed with hot people, not smart people. this is going to eventually fuck things up.

there are already countless examples of evolution being harmful to humans. look at alzheimers for instance. thsi is something that could have been eradicated if our ancestors hadnt mated while young (before the unwanted disease takes root). if they mated with older companions (of age where if the disease would have taken effect it would be showing by then) there mightbe no alzheimers. late blooming problematic mutations arent factored in to evolution because of this.

even hear about turtles that live for centuries? they also mate at all ages, helping to rid their gene pool of unwanted disease and defect.

Devolution won't go that quickly. If it took us X years to evolve from homo sapiens to homo sapiens sapiens, it'll take us at least 1000x years to evolve back. Metaphorically speaking.

Devolution shows itself in minor, insignificant things. Things that are insignificant since they no longer make our surviving chances bigger. For example: You probably know somebody who is really athletic, and can run for miles without feeling anything. Compare this person to an average Neanderthal, and your friend will be ashamed of himself.

Don't mix it up with the common, Devo-like "devolution". People getting more retarded every generation is not devolution; that's just an educational phenomena which has nothing to do with genetics. Example: People use calculators frequently, so their math(s) skills decline. This is because they don't practise maths anymore; not because they are genetically less intelligent.
Quote (Sioux @ Jan 19 2010 06:07am)
False. Genetic drift.


Which, in case it makes no difference to your chance of surviving / mating, is obsolete and insignificant.
Member
Posts: 61,687
Joined: Mar 14 2006
Gold: 28.77
Jan 22 2010 05:44pm
We have homogenized our species; biodiversity is the only way to survive and we are killing it all around us. I say no, not unless we have a change in vision and stop acting as we are now.
Member
Posts: 15,551
Joined: Mar 29 2003
Gold: 0.00
Jan 25 2010 12:01pm
Quote (LedZeppelin31493 @ Jan 16 2010 05:12pm)
i dont think we are evolving anymore we have everything needed for survival
thumb to bonk our prey with a club
canine teeth to tear flesh
molars to eat plant
incisors to gnaw down trees
sweat when we are hot
we grow arm, leg, chest hair to warm up our body
we can stand up right
basically we dominate in everything


imo 4 legs >> 2legs while doing anything that doesnt require arms


we dominate in everything ??? we dominate in only 1 thing and that is intelligence, the rest we got dominated in
Member
Posts: 8,969
Joined: Sep 7 2005
Gold: 252.00
Jan 25 2010 12:27pm
im pretty sure we are getting taller
Member
Posts: 7,603
Joined: Nov 1 2009
Gold: 82.00
Jan 25 2010 03:21pm
Quote (mastrshok @ Jan 16 2010 05:39pm)
Yes. Example given:  overall we humans are becoming better looking. If you look at 100 years ago or so and now we are on average better looking. (This is true).


This is based entirely on perspective.

Beauty lies in the eye of the beholder.
Member
Posts: 4,280
Joined: Jan 19 2008
Gold: 0.00
Jan 26 2010 04:07am
Quote (B4K3R @ Jan 16 2010 03:24am)
i feel as though we are not considering humans do not have to struggle for survival anymore. We can endure just about any environment we choose to live in, which rules out natural selection and survival of the fittest. And random mutations aren't nursed into becoming abundant. what do you think?


Well, I got bored of reading about 25 posts in.....
All the same, here are my two cents:

The human race is breeding out the extremes that have allowed us to survive drastic changes in our surroundings before. In order for "us" to be forced into evolution there would have to be something catastrophic to our species taking place, something we wouldn't be able to cope with at all. If the sea level rose and drowned a bunch of us, that doesn't mean we'd grow gills. We would still just utilize what we already have to overcome the obstacle until we were no longer able to do so. That is when some evolutionary steps would be made.
It would take a mutation that is positively attributed to those surroundings happening to many people of a generation, and for all those people to be able to still breed with the general populous in order for it to become commonplace.
Mutation + natural selection = evolution.
Go Back To Science, Technology & Nature Topic List
Prev1234511Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll