So Newtons theories only work if stand on a skateboard

No; they are more obvious when you are in a low friction environment (exactly what I said before).

It's a guess and check system when the equations aren't perfect.

I'm fairly certain we never landed on the moon because of the s9cial and political pressure to produce results while the technology was absolutely not there.

That doesn't mean all their proposals and technologies are bunk, the media and Hollywood science are the one pushing ideas seeing what sticks, so NASA and the rest of the military industrial complex like area 51 isn't a total facade like you keep implying.

They do work and they do publish their work (mostly) according to the real work they do.
So NASA doesn't publish much scientifically when it comes to deep space because THAT is the agenda and not the science, hence all moon landing documents that never existed.

Journalist:
"How are the mars mission going?
Elvis NASA tv guy:
"It looks good, huh? ...Lol let me rephrase that"


Like I don't believe in the "24 hour live ISS" feed, even though the ISS to me seems possible.
But I definitely believe in the NASA channel's presentations when it comes to the uncut unedited work in the hangars and in the vomitorum.

I guess what I'm saying is we shouldn't dismiss everything because of the source, a scientific discernment still applies.
[

This post was edited by MaliceMizer on Jul 1 2016 08:05pm

Well since there has been a stream of spacecraft going to the moon since the mid 1960's; at what point did they stop being fake, or do you contend all moon missions were fake (even recent ones)?

Images courtesy of Nasa themselves in a bulk posting of the Mars rover after it got covered in dust from a storm

^ lol if that was actually a person who isn't supposed to be there then they wouldn't release those photos because it would be so fucking obvious! But if it was actually part of the ship....

if it was a conspiracy then they'd have to be so careful with everything, but if it's all real then maybe they wouldn't give a fuck what certain people see in certain photos..

let me guess the night sky is a painting on a dome above us yeah?

on last picture u can CLEARLY see the curve of the planet!

111% proof that its spherical!

i also see The Lich King on the second picture!

btw why would it be "astronaut working on the rover" if the rover is clearly here on Earth... that damn astronaut wearing the costume even when hes not in space!

good work flat_sultan, parents must be proud!



This post was edited by luckspin on Jul 2 2016 03:48pm

I heard these were released in a bulk package and when the rover stopped transmitting because it was damaged by a dust storm and then it it all of sudden it got magically better, Nasa said the wind blew all the dust off.

Seems pretty strange, they could have just missed these or the could be purposefully trying to create conspiracies that suggest they are already on Mars or it could be the whole thing is a hoax - IDK point is I don't trust a word Nasa tells me - There's too much evidence to prove its all a lie and if you want to see it - then dont ask me and search the internet for it.
It's all there - just don't expect me to spoon feed you the truth. Do you think someone is worth trusting after they have been caught lying 100s of times?



Don't think there is any evidence of that - you can get a telescope and prove the stars are something - are they billions of light years away? - well get an analog telescope and ask yourself that.

Your parent must be so proud that you're fooled by a fish eye lense, what a muppet.

This post was edited by card_sultan on Jul 2 2016 03:50pm