That plane was probably planted by the illuminati tho

Srs tho why do vertical objects in different cities cast shadows of different lengths at the same time?

google to your heart's content. lmk when you find an answer that's consistent with your preconceived notions

I dont think that would negate any FE / Geocentric model - so you think of it as the sun being 93 million miles away and the Earth must be curved, but it also works if the sun is close and it the object is just at a different angle to the sun's position.

https://youtu.be/4NrSawangjk?list=PLsS9V6H1e2kkKNc9GIsbiHBlehDTD5rDF

100 video playlist that prove the sun is close and that the assumption the world is round is nothing but fake

get back to me after you watched them all

This post was edited by card_sultan on Jul 3 2016 06:58pm

Oh, really? How close is the sun to the earth, than?

Using shadows and simple geometry I can prove to you not only the circumference of the earth, but the distance between the earth and the moon and the distance between the earth and the sun. It was done over 2000 years ago. Give me another one of your bunk theories and I'll kill it

not 93 million miles

I would like to see you try without assuming the earth is curved and that gravity is real. Which you can't do because you need to assume those things first. It was done 2000 year ago and the math work s if you dont assume curve - which they couldnt proof 2000 years ago and only Nasa fakery shows curve.

It sucks that every baller need to have their hand held while they figure it out and are completely angry at even the suggestion they need to figure things out instead of having shit spoon feed to you.

This post was edited by card_sultan on Jul 3 2016 07:08pm

So you want me to prove that my model of the world is correct without using my model of the world? How reasonable

lol you edited and said they couldn't prove 2000 years ago that the earth was curved, but that's exactly was erastosthenes did with shadows... I could look up the different lengths of the shadows he used and try to calculate for you how ridiculously close the sun would have to be to create that discrepancy on a flat earth, but it's easier to just tell you this: the sun does not create shadows from vertical objects that go in opposite directions, ever, because it is not close enough to do so.

This post was edited by Shadowoffury on Jul 3 2016 07:13pm

I'm glad you see the irony of it all, that it's just a model, that certain assumptions were made to make it work and that those assumptions are still not proven, have you even read all the links and posts in all the FE threads on jsp that talk about Nasa fakery? I takes time to figure it all out , people won't make it easy, and will discourage you at every step, there is much anger out there and many deceivers.

This post was edited by card_sultan on Jul 3 2016 07:19pm

Now you're resorting to twisting my words? We are in disagreement, so as far as this conversation goes both round and flat earths are only models. In reality, one of them is correct, and it's probably the one that relies on math. You can't fake mathematics, if the numbers don't add up it's easy enough to prove. Read the edit from my last post and lmk how, mathematically, you can justify your position.

All of these other people have let you get away with "lol the earth doesn't look round from a camera in a plane." fuck that. I'm not reading all your links, show me some real math that suggests that there's even the smallest possibility that you're right.

If the earth is flat and the sun is close enough to create the huge discrepancy in shadow lengths of vertical objects that we see, than it's close enough to create shadows that travel in opposite directions--which we do not ever see. Why?