Hahaha, you haven't even been taught what inflation is in cosmology.



http://www.springerlink.com/content/y22487ku5823w844/

So God "spontaneously" created the beginnings of inflation?

Inflation is the initial condition of the universe.

Read the bolded, this paves the way for your missing "initial conditions of the universe". It is radical, but it is captivating to digest
SSs sS s s S S S S s ss S S s s s sS S ss SLAMMED.

This post was edited by Jazz_Thing on Jun 17 2009 12:08pm

I've stopped trying to reason with religious people a long time ago, they're not good at reasoning and never have been, it's why they became religious in the first place.

This topic means nothing to them~

you cant slame a religios minde

there will be allways an argument to reduce dissonance between "facts" and religious "knowledge".

for example adam + eva. in the past it was a fact that man came from adam + eva. If you trace back the ancient tree you will reach adam + eva. Thats what the bible says.

Now, god bless darwin, we know that there is something called evolution. By the process of selection, variation and reproduction species were created, for example homo sapiens.

Evolution vs "inteligent design" doesn't fit at all; still most of the christians accept the darwin theorie.
They bring arguments like "you have to understand the bibel in a correct way. Somebody has created the process of evolution and this one was god, so inteligent design is the right thing, etc etc etc".

Same thing with the beginning of the universe, the beginning of time and so on. Religious models are transform and reinterpreted until they fit together with scientific results.

There allways will be a hypothetic system, bigger than the real system.

sry for my crapy english. Despite of that i hope you can understand what im talking about

This post was edited by Wirbelschwein on Jun 18 2009 06:01am

Its definitely not a conclusive theory and people are now moving away from the inflationary model / chaotic inflationary model. Krystalis is right, the conditions at the beginning of the universe can not be explained by our current understand of physics -- we can come close to seeing what happened at the beginning of the universe, like nano seconds after the big bang -- but not the start of the big bang or obviously before that.

I believe she said "..how they [the initial conditions] came to be".

Inflation doesn't explain how the singularity got there.

fake

iomg-.

Well said...who doesn't want to go to a magical utopia when they die? ; )

lol, as if Science has ever been in the business of proving or disproving religion.

Religion is bullshit used for marketing propaganda and scare tactics so the massive legions of retards don't go thinking their way into a rebellion with the government, or what have you.