yeah well it's still arguable if it's because human activity or just natural circulation or both. I wonder if human yet have means to change the composition of atmosphere. There's much air. When industry release one CO2, there's a plant using it to produce O2 among other products.

damn so lucky wish we could change places

read GIEC study on the matter. Yes humans are perfectly able to change climate lol.
If that's not enough, check the temperature raise since ~1950. There is no doubt about it.
Loss of biodiversity is another consequence of it too, and we know it since long.

Since it's a very short time. And loss of biodiversity isn't necessarily ALL because of human actions. To put it short the issue is problematic because we dont have written knowledge about it.

This post was edited by Crud1ty on Sep 5 2018 06:13am

You have no idea what you're talking about... have a good day

Empty words from an empty mind.

Good formulas does not mean that you're right ..

denying the disaster we're making is like believing in flat earth .. are you a flat earther ? or just plain stupid ?

no need to read your troll reply, save us all some time and go spam somewhere else nerd, thanks

This post was edited by Melatonina on Sep 5 2018 06:54am

Do you have even a clue how much co2 is pumped into the atmosphere from volcanoes and such?

Not to mention methane pockets breaking loose and surfacing out of the ocean.

Aka Bermuda triangle and whatnot.

Do human's contribute? Ofc, are they the only factor? Of course not.

Are humans responsible for a runaway greenhouse effect?
Debatable.

This post was edited by Ep0ch on Sep 5 2018 06:56am

You are right, humans aren't responsible for all that CO2.
Hell, 300 millions years before the concentration of atmospheric C02 was even way higher than today.
What does it prove ? Absolutely nothing since we cant compare the world today with what it was at that time.
Still facts are facts, we are living into the sixth mass extinction of species.
The thing is, its happening way faster than naturally. Some very simple graphics explain it.

And no it is not debatable, it is proven and it is the scientific consensus actually. The more we study environment the more we understand processus behing thoses change.

You mock every day chivas and card for not accepting the consensus about earth's shape and yet you're doing the same here. irony my nerd..

This post was edited by Melatonina on Sep 5 2018 07:46am

I'm not saying anything one way or the other, most hippies who cry humanities to blame fail to understand the bigger picture.


-e

There is a fine line between truth and propaganda.

This post was edited by Ep0ch on Sep 5 2018 09:12am