Quote (card_sultan @ May 24 2017 10:37pm)

Explain how you can fit 6+ statements in one sentence with questions, comments and opinions intermingled and still think your post made any grammatical sense at all?

I need to break apart your sentence because it has such bad writing skills:

How can you say gravity doesn't exist in one sentence // it doesn't

then question someone on the electromagnetic field on our planet // its not a planet, its a plane
and the range of gravity in the next? // cause i want to see what he knows and doesn't

For one, the range of gravity is known, at least loosely. // loosley? I thought you claimed to know everything? Is your belief in Heliocentrism :loosely based on something you heard while you were daydreaming in school?

For two, electromagnetism and gravity are closely related // Closely related - is like like when you marry a cousin?

in technical and mathematical terms //is that like not understanding the difference between 2d side views from 3d optical views because their both perspective and any meaning beyond your simple one word definition understanding is unreasonable?

so I'm really intrigued how you plan to explain the electromagnetic field of our planet
How can you say gravity doesn't exist in one sentence then question someone on the electromagnetic field on our planet and the range of gravity in the next?
https://aplanetruth.info/2016/02/25/electromagnetic-flat-earth/

and how your flat earth theory explains it better than our current theory //cause the ball earth is clearly nothing but BS and until i find a better one ill go with this one

which you clearly know zero about. // Actually i believed all the same crap you did for more years than you been thinking and to believe FE/Geocentricity you need a very solid understanding of Heliocentricity so when i question something its a rhetoric question to make you see the lies.

Quote (Xx Shin3d0wn xX @ May 24 2017 06:41pm)

Gravity and electromagnetism are no near distant cousins as you can see below.

Quote (Xx Shin3d0wn xX @ May 24 2017 06:41pm)

What you don't seem to understand is that regardless of what we visually perceive because of our relative position it doesn't change the math.

Quote (card_sultan @ May 25 2017 02:03am)

yes, one exist the other is just fantasy.



your position wouldnt change, your optics would, and so would the angles

http://i.imgur.com/wS1HUai.png

ill keep posting this picture till you understand it, it'll probably take 6 -12 times for you to look at it and understand

im not trying to be mean, but you clearly dont understand at this point

The ceiling in that bottom photo is not going down

The floor is not going up

That 3 d optical perspective.

Quote (Xx Shin3d0wn xX @ May 25 2017 01:44am)

Why do you continue to dodge any valid proofs then you just contrive proven mathematics as fantasy. How can you justify electromagnetism and deny gravity in the same sentence when they are both measurable forces dependent upon each other. Are you seriously that dense?

You can show me that photo a million more times and I don't care whether we look from the eyes of an ant, midget, child, adult, or giant it doesn't change what the goddamn math will be and the fact that you think otherwise is mind boggling.

Quote (card_sultan @ May 25 2017 09:57am)

Quote (tard_sultan @ May 24 2017 08:10pm)

It doesn't just have to be from NASA, though NASA has high Earth orbit satellite photos that don't have to be stitched together like the composites they compile from low Earth orbit. There are innumerable other sources for Earth curvature photography, and some very good pictures of the whole side as seen from high Earth orbit from a Russian weather satellite. //Computer Generated Images, learn to tell the difference between a photo and a painting

That is incontrovertible, and you dodge the fuck out of it. //How is knowing they are completely fake "dodging the fuck out of it", oh i forget - your a fanboy of circle-jerk hypocritical logic


Foucault's pendulum proving the Earth's rotation. // why do you need to start the pendulum swinging - why does it stop - does it also proves the Earth is not spinning too or that the earth has stopped spinning??

Navigation-grade gyroscopes also prove rotation. // gyros prove the earth doesn't spin while also showing then can detect procession


Satellites being in orbit// are complete bs - Tropospheric scatter and antennas, float em on ballon - get everyone to believe it - profit!

Seasons are incontrovertible // Sun rotating between tropic of cancer and tropic of capricorn explains season

I'd really love to hear you explain how there can be midnight sun at antarctic research stations operated by 31 different nations, // are you talking about the one film with all the jump cuts in it - you believe that video

No that i've clearly answered all your questions you owe me an explanation as to why your a compete lying pos and need to dodge answering anything i ask

WHat is your explanation to why accelerometers can show the earth being flat and level?

Why do you not know the difference between 2d side view reality and 3d optical perspective?

If the Big Bang really happened which came first - the gravity to create mass or the mass to create gravity?

What's holding the Universe up?

What is the range for gravity?

Why does magnetic declination vary so greatly at the south pole - so much so that that you might need to do a complete 180 degrees in order to be facing the direction your compass says?

Why do all compasses point north - do they point right though the earth?

Have you personally been to space and confirmed anything or did you just hear about space one night when you stayed at a Holiday Inn?

I know you won't answer these cause you're a liar and dodger who can't even show his 2 d side view picture because it would expose how he just copies ideas off of metabunk

Yeah the only thing incontrovertible here is that you're a sack of ----- who loves to worship his state religion

Quote (Santara @ May 25 2017 12:28pm)

Prove they're computer generated. Oh wait, that's right, you have absolutely NO proof, just a cockamamie unfalsifiable excuse pulled out of your ass. They are legit photos until you do and remain incontrovertible. //haha you cant tell the difference between CGI and real - what a visual loser!
Why do you need to "start" the pendulum? Because objects at rest tend to stay at rest. It stops eventually due to friction. So no, it never proves a flat Earth. It's one of those MANY physics things that fly over your head. //correct, an object at rest stay at rest - just like the earth - obviously your assessment is wrong as usual

Poor quality gyros and poor experiments lend credence to a flat Earth. People who know better have smashed your shit experiment. The fact that you utterly failed to address the fact that high quality gyros detect curvature has not gone unnoticed. //He showed his gyro being 100% able to detect procession with a force much less than the entire Earth spinning, your excuse is just a result of your poor observation skills and getting all your info from Metabunk which has been shown to be a liar just like yourself Gyros proving the earth flat are incontrovertible

You can't prove that any satellites are held aloft by balloon. You also can't explain their great speed, visible to the naked eye at night. The only thing that is BS is your excuse. //Well first all all your cant even see a spy plane at 100,000 feet, the idea you can see something 12 x higher, 6 x smaller and going 17x faster -at nightshows you ridiculous your arguments are. And if every "satellite" can be traced back to a launch at a balloon facility , while using troposcatter and antennas - + you never see any satellites from the ISS feed and supposedly there millions of stuff , but you claim u see them from earth - what a joke liar you are :rofl:
The sun vacillating between the tropics of Cancer and Capricorn can't possibly explain the seasons. The sun shines 24 hours a day in Antarctica in the southern summer, yet it isn't possible to illuminate ANY part of Antarctica with the excuses you've offered. You can't even explain the sun's supposed motions without making up bullshit terminology that has no foundation in scientific fact. //The sun isn't above the sky for 24 hours a day in antarctica and actual camera footage proves that and the sun "vacillating" between the tropic rings is incontrovertible reason to cause the seasons.

No, I'm not talking about... whatever video you think it is, because unlike you, I don't live on YouTube learning from idiots. Instead, you can go to live feed webcams of research stations, like those noted here: http://www.antarctica.gov.au/webcams Of course, Antarctica is heading into their winter, so don't expect midnight sun any time soon.

So no, you haven't clearly answered a single question. You've offered long-since destroyed excuses. You haven't given any indication whether we're resolved on question two before I move onto three.

//unlike you who get all his info from Metabunk, i've been to those stations and viewed their camera footage - none show a 24 hour sun. Incontrovertible proof[/COLOR]

Quote (tard_sultan @ May 25 2017 06:11pm)

haha you cant tell the difference between CGI and real - what a visual loser!

Quote

//correct, an object at rest stay at rest - just like the earth - obviously your assessment is wrong as usual

Quote

//He showed his gyro being 100% able to detect procession with a force much less than the entire Earth spinning, your excuse is just a result of your poor observation skills and getting all your info from Metabunk which has been shown to be a liar just like yourself Gyros proving the earth flat are incontrovertible

Quote

//Well first all all your cant even see a spy plane at 100,000 feet, the idea you can see something 12 x higher, 6 x smaller and going 17x faster -at nightshows you ridiculous your arguments are. And if every "satellite" can be traced back to a launch at a balloon facility , while using troposcatter and antennas - + you never see any satellites from the ISS feed and supposedly there millions of stuff , but you claim u see them from earth - what a joke liar you are :rofl:

Quote

The sun isn't above the sky for 24 hours a day in antarctica and actual camera footage proves that and the sun "vacillating" between the tropic rings is incontrovertible reason to cause the seasons.

Quote

unlike you who get all his info from Metabunk, i've been to those stations and viewed their camera footage - none show a 24 hour sun. Incontrovertible proof