BBC How Plants Communicate & Think - Amazing Nature Documentary

Kinda depressing that there's probably a plant out there with a higher capacity for learning than yourself isn't it.

To be fair, card is pretty much a vegetable.

Seeing as you're the one who willfully ignores incontrovertible proofs, it is absolutely you who is blind too.

This post was edited by Santara on May 24 2017 02:33pm

says the zombie



a picture from Nasa is "incontrovertible" um ok

heres incontrovertible proof Ewoks exist



If you dont believe this picture, you're clearly retarded.....

This post was edited by card_sultan on May 24 2017 03:07pm

It doesn't just have to be from NASA, though NASA has high Earth orbit satellite photos that don't have to be stitched together like the composites they compile from low Earth orbit. There are innumerable other sources for Earth curvature photography, and some very good pictures of the whole side as seen from high Earth orbit from a Russian weather satellite. That is incontrovertible, and you dodge the fuck out of it. You dodge Foucault's pendulum proving the Earth's rotation. It's incontrovertible. You have no answer for it. Navigation-grade gyroscopes also prove rotation. Satellites being in orbit are incontrovertible. Seasons are incontrovertible.

I'd really love to hear you explain how there can be midnight sun at antarctic research stations operated by 31 different nations, and where on the flat Earth map the Amundsen-Scott south pole research station is.

It doesn't just have to be from NASA, though NASA has high Earth orbit satellite photos that don't have to be stitched together like the composites they compile from low Earth orbit. There are innumerable other sources for Earth curvature photography, and some very good pictures of the whole side as seen from high Earth orbit from a Russian weather satellite. //Computer Generated Images, learn to tell the difference between a photo and a painting

That is incontrovertible, and you dodge the fuck out of it. //How is knowing they are completely fake "dodging the fuck out of it", oh i forget - your a fanboy of circle-jerk hypocritical logic


Foucault's pendulum proving the Earth's rotation. // why do you need to start the pendulum swinging - why does it stop - does it also proves the Earth is not spinning too or that the earth has stopped spinning??

Navigation-grade gyroscopes also prove rotation. // gyros prove the earth doesn't spin while also showing then can detect procession


Satellites being in orbit// are complete bs - Tropospheric scatter and antennas, float em on ballon - get everyone to believe it - profit!

Seasons are incontrovertible // Sun rotating between tropic of cancer and tropic of capricorn explains season

I'd really love to hear you explain how there can be midnight sun at antarctic research stations operated by 31 different nations, // are you talking about the one film with all the jump cuts in it - you believe that video

No that i've clearly answered all your questions you owe me an explanation as to why your a compete lying pos and need to dodge answering anything i ask

WHat is your explanation to why accelerometers can show the earth being flat and level?

Why do you not know the difference between 2d side view reality and 3d optical perspective?

If the Big Bang really happened which came first - the gravity to create mass or the mass to create gravity?

What's holding the Universe up?

What is the range for gravity?

Why does magnetic declination vary so greatly at the south pole - so much so that that you might need to do a complete 180 degrees in order to be facing the direction your compass says?

Why do all compasses point north - do they point right though the earth?

Have you personally been to space and confirmed anything or did you just hear about space one night when you stayed at a Holiday Inn?

I know you won't answer these cause you're a liar and dodger who can't even show his 2 d side view picture because it would expose how he just copies ideas off of metabunk

Yeah the only thing incontrovertible here is that you're a sack of ----- who loves to worship his state religion

This post was edited by card_sultan on May 24 2017 07:20pm

And btw - why do you need to declare your emotions after each thing you write, is that your way to confirm what your are writing?

It's like here's a joke - xxxxx

here is me laughing at said joke -lol

therefore joke is funny.

Its like you need to hear a confirmation of your own bias , and once it's confirmed (by your own mind) it's incontrovertible.

So sad.

This post was edited by card_sultan on May 24 2017 07:45pm

How can you say gravity doesn't exist in one sentence then question someone on the electromagnetic field on our planet and the range of gravity in the next?

For one, the range of gravity is known, at least loosely. For two, electromagnetism and gravity are closely related in technical and mathematical terms so I'm really intrigued how you plan to explain the electromagnetic field of our planet and how your flat earth theory explains it better than our current theory, which you clearly know zero about.

This post was edited by Xx Shin3d0wn xX on May 24 2017 08:17pm

Explain how you can fit 6+ statements in one sentence with questions, comments and opinions intermingled and still think your post made any grammatical sense at all?

I need to break apart your sentence because it has such bad writing skills:

How can you say gravity doesn't exist in one sentence // it doesn't

then question someone on the electromagnetic field on our planet // its not a planet, its a plane
and the range of gravity in the next? // cause i want to see what he knows and doesn't

For one, the range of gravity is known, at least loosely. // loosley? I thought you claimed to know everything? Is your belief in Heliocentrism :loosely based on something you heard while you were daydreaming in school?

For two, electromagnetism and gravity are closely related // Closely related - is like like when you marry a cousin?

in technical and mathematical terms //is that like not understanding the difference between 2d side views from 3d optical views because their both perspective and any meaning beyond your simple one word definition understanding is unreasonable?

so I'm really intrigued how you plan to explain the electromagnetic field of our planet
How can you say gravity doesn't exist in one sentence then question someone on the electromagnetic field on our planet and the range of gravity in the next?
https://aplanetruth.info/2016/02/25/electromagnetic-flat-earth/

and how your flat earth theory explains it better than our current theory //cause the ball earth is clearly nothing but BS and until i find a better one ill go with this one

which you clearly know zero about. // Actually i believed all the same crap you did for more years than you been thinking and to believe FE/Geocentricity you need a very solid understanding of Heliocentricity so when i question something its a rhetoric question to make you see the lies.

This post was edited by card_sultan on May 24 2017 09:43pm