I know English is hard for you, like most things, so I'll help you out here. Remember how you said that a comma can separate two sentences and the first one doesn't necessarily apply to the second? Yes, he received a bachelor's degree in "experimental nuclear physics". No, he does not teach or work with nuclear physics. He has 20 years of teaching economics. Getting an under-grad degree in physics doesn't make you physicist, and as someone who HAS an under-grade degree (unlike you) I can assure you that I've seen all sorts of idiots manage to scrape by and graduate while having no fucking idea what they are even studying.

i've already answered your stupid question 3 times, you should really stop stuttering and answer my questions, but seeing as how you've already been exposed for your stupidity - you just sound like a broken record at this point.

You have not answered even ONE time whether you agree or disagree that sound travels more slowly at high altitude, and I challenge you to link to even ONE comment of these supposed three that you have.

what is the name of this experiment that showed this and who conducted this experiment - if it was the military - it probably disinformation and propaganda.

Instead of trying to focus on this flight you've never seen or been on - why dont you talk about about how accelerometer built into every phone prove that the earth doesn't spin or is a ball.

But im sure youll keep your head in the sand. Stay blind.

Still haven't answered, though I will take your tone as an expression that you disagree but don't know how or why to disagree, so you just threw some shit at the wall because you don't know shit about physics.

Okay, that means we're not done with question one, so no reason yet to move onto question two yet.

Now we need to get into the math of the speed of sound to confirm that it indeed travels slower at high altitudes. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Speed_of_sound#Equations

...and especially: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Speed_of_sound#Altitude_variation_and_implications_for_atmospheric_acoustics

I can't believe you have an undergraduate degree from a real University, unless it's from the Acme Commie Indoctrination of the State, that i could believe. This guy is 100x more qualified than some random loser on a game site with an undergraduate degree in basket weaving.

"Graduated from the Department of Experimental and Theoretical Physics, Moscow Engineering Physics Institute, received qualification of engineer-physicist in "experimental nuclear physics."
Finished correspondence postgraduate study in solid-state physics at the Institute of General Physics, Academy of Sciences of the USSR and defended the specialized council under the chairmanship of Prokhorov's PhD thesis

He also teaches physics and is an associate professor, while you're just a blatant liar. He doesn't teach economics - this is just more of your blatant ridiculous lies, where do you get your information from - do you just make it up?

still haven't answer any of my questions, why do you keep dodging?

here some nice rhetoric from your link:

"However, there are variations in this trend above 11 km. In particular, in the stratosphere above about 20 km, the speed of sound increases with height, due to an increase in temperature from heating within the ozone layer. This produces a positive speed of sound gradient in this region."

Thanks for posting a link that prove you're a liar, answer my questions now dodger.

This post was edited by card_sultan on May 19 2017 12:29pm

Um, hello? I'm still trying to answer question one. We can't move on to number two until we're clear on number one.

here some nice rhetoric from your link:

"However, there are variations in this trend above 11 km. In particular, in the stratosphere above about 20 km, the speed of sound increases with height, due to an increase in temperature from heating within the ozone layer. This produces a positive speed of sound gradient in this region."

Thanks for posting a link that prove you're a liar, answer my questions now dodger.

Plus i asked most of these questions and you started dodging well before you're silly misunderstandings - so i'm still number one, answer the questions dodger.

I have a BSc in Software Engineering (with Distinction) from the University of Calgary. My name is stamped on the Dean's List for 3 consecutive years, hanging in Engineering Block C (if I remember correctly). Looks like a metal gear with names stamped into it.

As for this guy:

Name at the top.
Faculty of mathematics, informatics, natural sciences, and information technologies


Institute of economics and culture


In 2002 started working at this place in the faculty of mathematics and informatics (later renamed to math and physics), which is also responsible for teaching economics.


Scientific and educational work:
Continues scientific work in the area of applying mathematics to economic research. For example, analysis of stock price variability, matrix models in the area of economics


And so on and so forth. The only actual physics work that's even mentioned is in the area of dielectric materials, which again has nothing to do with the shape of the earth.