I've already explained 3 times, if you haven't gotten it yet you might be one of those retarded people who dont understand the difference between reality and the reality of optical perspective.

Answer these questions:
Are these railroad tracks going over a hill in reality or just appear to be raising optically because of perspective?



Is this water raising in reality or just optically raising according to the Law of optical perspective?




This post was edited by card_sultan on May 21 2017 11:52pm

If the object is bright enough it doesn't matter how far away it is.

What started as joke has grown into the biggest failure of science.

I don't know what's worse, the fact that people didn't realize it was all a joke, or the people who actually believe it. Then again, it's the same people, so C.) All of the above.
For the flatearthers (As, you are the only ones who wouldn't understand if my comment was pointed towards you all, or the people with brains, who know that the earth is round...) yes, my comment is pointed towards you.

Perspective doesn't make things continue to fall. They only go to the vanishing point and no further, and this can be proven with basic trigonometry.

Trig is far beyond basic for card, he cant even wrap he head around basic 100 level geometric and physics as is.

should be funny until you realize some people are actually truely believe in that shit


This post was edited by Saucisson6000 on May 22 2017 10:57am

Dodge my questions and doesn't understand reality versus the reality of perspective, your indoctrination is fucking hilarious.

Ballers have Down syndrome cause they dont know which way down is really.

This post was edited by card_sultan on May 22 2017 11:23am

Perspective actually says things will NEVER cross the horizon if they travel parallel to the ground. They will only asymptotically approach the horizon/vanishing point.

This post was edited by Thor123422 on May 22 2017 11:31am

Oh, so you completely and utterly ignored my post, that's a little sad.
Anyway, do tell me this.

How is it that you find it so difficult to accept our models with respect to the earth's shape and the position of the earth with respect to the sun, but accept so blindly all models that exist upon the subject of perspectives, for one, and how we perceive light, or how we even perceive time since all your videos go "so deep" into timelapse?

By the way, does your silly model also suggest the flat earth is fully stationary and not rotating? I find it a little difficult to believe that the entire Universe around us (i.e. visible stars and stuff) would twirl around in our dark sky like that. They would have to move at a speed quite a few factor of tens higher than the speed of light to accomplish that, and there would be a force in the center of that rotation that I wager is quite a bit larger than the very explosion that gave birth to our Universe. Just some thoughts ._.

/e Oh, fuck, wait, you don't believe in our models with respect to how the Universe came to be, probably. What are we then. Energy fluctuation?

This post was edited by Forg0tten on May 22 2017 11:32am

No, YOU dodged my questions, now it's time for you to convert to the spheric authority




here's the sun in the true spheric heaven of a 0° angle




the sextant; destroying flat eaters since 1730 !



This post was edited by Saucisson6000 on May 22 2017 11:47am