ahhh, so now we are calling the bible "symbolic", and we all can make up our own conclusions from it then?
god needed 6 days, those were probably days calculated in the 45th dimension, thus taking 423523522 normal earth years, thus it all ends up in the right place.

cough..bullshit...cough..

time and time again, creationists are warping out of their minds to make the bilbe fit into the ever increasing evidence that we evolved... why not simply admit it?

i just said most creationists believe in evolution u dumb piece of shit and i mean its symbolic for example it sais 144,000 people are sealed to join the kingdom of heaven 12,000 people from each tribe of israeal which is obvious if u believe in creation that its a symbol

Where to begin with your post?

Actually most Atheists, are not ignorant they try to fill their lives with new information, new ideas a constant invigoration of intellectual progress. Religion, by contrast tries to only stagnate in assertions that have no proof whatsoever, unless if there is some speculative text that can be interpreted in a highly subjective manner, Bible, Koran, Torah, etc etc.

Science is objective, do you not understand this? Your jibber jabber attempts to establish that "evolution happened, but God did it" is false.

Either evolution happened or God didn't create humans, PERIOD. End of discussion, there is no discourse or idea that God created humans because evolution is the only idea that can be explained with proof and evidence. This is merely a very significant leap in Evolutionary Anthropology and Archeology/Paleontology.

See all of those -ologies? Those are prefixes for scientific fields which your Creation science are not allowed. That doesn't mean you are NOT allowed to believe in God, just don't talk about it when we're discussing Science.

This latest development is a critical development in the progression of Science's onward victory towards Religious interpretations of the Universe and its characteristics. This is about as significant as proving that the Earth was not flat, or that the Earth was not in the center of the universe, Adam and Eve creation from a rib.

Its just a checklist of ideas that have to be tested, eventually they will all be verified in the favor of science with EVIDENCE. That is something that you will never have.

This is one of many "missing" links, the first of its kind to be verified and be preserved immaculately in its very very brief time period of around 49 million years ago.

I really hope this was a troll.

This post was edited by Jazz_Thing on Jun 2 2009 08:52am

Uh, creationists don't believe in Evolution. Period. Thats why they're creationists. There are many Christians who believe in evolution, but the title of Creationist is reserved for a person who rejects evolution and promotes a divine creation view of the origin of species.

Get educated before you try to insult a whole discipline of science and philosophy brah

btw the "missing link" is never said to be the missing link by the scientists that found it. They specifically address that topic in the paper and say there is in no way enough evidence yet to call it the "Missing link". However by its own merits, it is an important discovery for science.

AKA GTFO

The idiocracies of this scientary post are hypocritcary of the ideocratical beleifs of religion.

I had to

jazz thats one of the athiest im talking about i dont mean all atheists are ignorant but theres kids like that. i have a friend whos atheist who strives to study and learn about everything he can but people that dont know shit probably shouldnt post, and also im almost certain majority of christians i guess i wont call it creationists believe in evolution i mean theres proof it happens so u cant really deny it

This post was edited by feedmefear on Jun 2 2009 10:31am

EPIC.