Quote (tard_sultan @ May 12 2017 07:24pm)
Ive already answered it: Magnetic vortex and locking, its not my problem if your too simple to understand it. So if the sun's gravity is holding up the earth, and the solar system's gravity is holding up the Sun, and the universe's gravity is holding up the solar system,
What's holding up the Universe?- and if the universe's gravity is holding up our galaxy but all the galaxies are getting farther away, away a
t what point will there be not enough gravity to hold us up and well fall out of the sky? Also while we're at it - there one question that bugged me about the big bang theory since your a doctor of science, so in the big bang there was nothing and then this nothing all exploded outward, so
which came first - the gravity to create mass or the mass to create gravity, stop dodging and please answer a question.
Nice cartoon picture of the jet stream - notice how the center of it goes to the east and below the equator it goes to the west - odd -isn't that the same direction as the sun?
https://s-media-cache-ak0.pinimg.com/originals/28/c6/b4/28c6b47cb735db28eaaef13cf34a5ff9.jpgHow does coriolis effect the direction of spinning in Fantasyland - is one half of the planet spinning in the opposite direction?
Also in the Helios Fantasy theory, the earth's orbital speed around the sun varies between 107,200 km/h. and 152,098,232 km/h - so why is it no one notice this change of speed?
How does temperature make things move? - well doesn't heat rise and cool fall - this is grade 3 stuff, please go back to school.
Keep dodging on providing accurate data on the wind speeds of for all elevations of the jet stream to proof your ridiculous claim the Santiago to Sydney flight is done with a normal commercial plane. Extraordinary claims require extraordinary proof - i need tested steel samples and odometer/speedometer/altimeter, video - a lot of stuff to back up your extraordinary and ridiculous claims
better get busy dodger.
No stupid, I didn't say you didn't answer it, I said you can't explain it. No one buys your bullshit about "magnetic vortexes and locking," and you can't even possibly demonstrate how such forces account for physical world observations. You sure as shit can't demonstrate compasses around the world successfully detecting this bullshit, much less demonstrating the existence of a monopole magnetic field like you've asserted the Earth has.
Gravity isn't "holding up" anything. It is holding celestial bodies in free fall around each other, pretty much like a coin rolling down a funnel. The only differences being the number of funnels, and the speeds of the objects moving in them (and some speeds are fast enough to eventually escape the confines of a funnel). But yes, the universe is flying apart. I don't know what you mean about "fall out of the sky."
I don't know why you're asking new questions, when you can't even tell me if my answers to your prior questions answered your question.
Regarding the Coriolis Effect, yes, one half of the planet is "spinning in the opposite direction," in that if you look down on the equator from orbit, one hemisphere rotates away to the left, the other to the right. Your ridiculous map neither corresponds with observed prevailing winds on the surface, nor explains westerlies.
Speed changes because the Earth's orbit is
elliptical. It's amazing how much information you ignore. We've been over this. Like how the number of days from the spring equinox to the autumn one is 185 days (when the Earth is moving slower) and is only 180 days from autumn to spring equinox (when the Earth is moving faster), it's due to the elliptical shape of the orbit.
"Grade 3" doesn't explain the consistent wind patterns moving in the opposite direction from your supposed sun orbit.
The jet stream is not known to blow at 500+ mph. The jet stream also blows west to east. I didn't bring up Santiago, though I'm sure I can develop a suitable argument with the appropriate math if you want to fixate on these cities instead of JNB and SYD. You're the one who has extraordinary claims requiring extraordinary proof. I'm arguing the side of the scientifically accepted and provable real world.