d2jsp
Log InRegister
d2jsp Forums > Off-Topic > General Chat > Science, Technology & Nature > Monolths
Prev1153154155156157174Next
Closed New Topic New Poll
Member
Posts: 63,097
Joined: Jan 11 2005
Gold: 9,765.00
Warn: 60%
May 12 2017 01:37pm
Quote (Dodgetard @ May 12 2017 09:12am)
More irony.



Grand worldwide secret to keep the masses from knowing the shape of their planet = very ridiculous = your assertion.


King Henry the Viii declared the world was a ball in 1545, very ridiculous assertion, how did he know for sure if no one had ever seen it, just theorized about it? Was it because Magellan had completed his east west circumnavigation of the circular plane and the propaganda could be ripe to rake in profit from Merchant trading ships from sailors who were afraid to sail from fear of falling off the flat Earth? Oh yeah - east-west circumnavigation is completely possible on the circular plane and should be recognized for the complete BS it is.




Quote (Santara @ May 12 2017 09:12am)
How does a jet stream exist on a flat Earth without the Coriolis Effect?


The rotation of the sun and moon over the circular plane we live on.

The greater the difference in air temperature, the faster the jet stream, which can reach speeds of up to 250 mph (402 kph) or greater.

I asked you to post jet stream data but you dodged, probably cause you a dodger and liar with a bit of rageaholic thrown in, nice combo

This post was edited by card_sultan on May 12 2017 01:46pm
Member
Posts: 7,324
Joined: Dec 22 2002
Gold: 1,261.00
May 12 2017 03:37pm
Quote (card_sultan @ May 12 2017 12:03pm)
Teleportation = very ridiculous = your assertion
Killing every person on board = very ridiculous = your assertion

Modifying a plane to take advantage of jet streams at different altitude or to fly slight faster is very reasonable considering the US military has technolgy 30 years ahead of what they say.
And common airliners are like 1970 technology - the idea nothing has been done to improve that is ridiculous. Everything you say/do is ridiculous. That should be your name - redickUliesStatist, sounds catchy right?


Can you prove to me that they don't kill every passenger and replace them with an android?

Quote (card_sultan @ May 12 2017 12:37pm)

The greater the difference in air temperature, the faster the jet stream, which can reach speeds of up to 250 mph (402 kph) or greater.


In which direction? Specifically for the Santiago to Sydney flight, in which direction is the jet stream flowing?

This post was edited by russian on May 12 2017 03:39pm
Member
Posts: 52,224
Joined: Jan 3 2009
Gold: 8,902.00
May 12 2017 04:25pm
Quote (tard_sultan @ May 12 2017 02:25pm)
Nice animation, must be real.

How does Radar work past 50 miles if the Earth is curved.


Because the plane is 7 fucking miles in the air. Also, because they are using over-the-horizon radar, which can have ranges in the hundreds, even a thousand miles.

Quote (tard_sultan @ May 12 2017 02:37pm)
King Henry the Viii declared the world was a ball in 1545, very ridiculous assertion, how did he know for sure if no one had ever seen it, just theorized about it? Was it because Magellan had completed his east west circumnavigation of the circular plane and the propaganda could be ripe to rake in profit from Merchant trading ships from sailors who were afraid to sail from fear of falling off the flat Earth? Oh yeah - east-west circumnavigation is completely possible on the circular plane and should be recognized for the complete BS it is.


Henry VIII is not even remotely close to the first person to make such a declaration. But really, you want to rest your bullshit theory on the notion that a successful circumnavigation prevented sailors from fearing falling over the edge? Then how in the fuck did Columbus get sailors to go west in 1492? How did Erik the Red get crews to sail west in 982? This is ALL about navigation? And yet you ignore the fuck out of great circle navigation that is clearly in use ALL OVER THE BALL! You can't make this level of stupid up!



This post was edited by Santara on May 12 2017 04:54pm
Member
Posts: 52,224
Joined: Jan 3 2009
Gold: 8,902.00
May 12 2017 05:52pm
Quote (tard_sultan @ May 12 2017 02:37pm)
The rotation of the sun and moon over the circular plane we live on.

The greater the difference in air temperature, the faster the jet stream, which can reach speeds of up to 250 mph (402 kph) or greater.

I asked you to post jet stream data but you dodged, probably cause you a dodger and liar with a bit of rageaholic thrown in, nice combo


Yo can't even explain how the sun and moon move without the presence of gravity. All you did was make up wholesale bullshit about a monopole magnetic field. And now you want to try a fantasy about temperature changes? How do temperature changes cause the northern and southern hemisphere westerlies?



Not only did I not dodge your question about the jet stream, I answered it, and when you complained that I dodged it, linked to the answer again. Just another lie, in a sea of lies from you.
Member
Posts: 63,097
Joined: Jan 11 2005
Gold: 9,765.00
Warn: 60%
May 12 2017 06:24pm
Quote (Saucisson6000 @ May 12 2017 07:42am)
i see the earth is curved in your picture, prooving my point: space station is real, it's just it's not on orbit arround the earth, but on a spheric planet from another dimension... ^_^


Of course, all pictures are real - the idea you can fake stuff is a myth... -_-





Quote (Dodgetard @ May 12 2017 01:52pm)
Yo can't even explain how the sun and moon move without the presence of gravity. All you did was make up wholesale bullshit about a monopole magnetic field. And now you want to try a fantasy about temperature changes? How do temperature changes cause the northern and southern hemisphere westerlies?

https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/1/18/Map_prevailing_winds_on_earth.png

Not only did I not dodge your question about the jet stream, I answered it, and when you complained that I dodged it, linked to the answer again. Just another lie, in a sea of lies from you.


Ive already answered it: Magnetic vortex and locking, its not my problem if your too simple to understand it. So if the sun's gravity is holding up the earth, and the solar system's gravity is holding up the Sun, and the universe's gravity is holding up the solar system, What's holding up the Universe?- and if the universe's gravity is holding up our galaxy but all the galaxies are getting farther away, away at what point will there be not enough gravity to hold us up and well fall out of the sky? Also while we're at it - there one question that bugged me about the big bang theory since your a doctor of science, so in the big bang there was nothing and then this nothing all exploded outward, so which came first - the gravity to create mass or the mass to create gravity, stop dodging and please answer a question.
Nice cartoon picture of the jet stream - notice how the center of it goes to the east and below the equator it goes to the west - odd -isn't that the same direction as the sun?



How does coriolis effect the direction of spinning in Fantasyland - is one half of the planet spinning in the opposite direction?

Also in the Helios Fantasy theory, the earth's orbital speed around the sun varies between 107,200 km/h. and 152,098,232 km/h - so why is it no one notice this change of speed?

How does temperature make things move? - well doesn't heat rise and cool fall - this is grade 3 stuff, please go back to school.

Keep dodging on providing accurate data on the wind speeds of for all elevations of the jet stream to proof your ridiculous claim the Santiago to Sydney flight is done with a normal commercial plane. Extraordinary claims require extraordinary proof - i need tested steel samples and odometer/speedometer/altimeter, video - a lot of stuff to back up your extraordinary and ridiculous claims

better get busy dodger.

This post was edited by card_sultan on May 12 2017 06:53pm
Member
Posts: 66,666
Joined: May 17 2005
Gold: 17,384.69
May 12 2017 07:06pm
You are disgusting

Member
Posts: 63,908
Joined: Jun 26 2009
Gold: 169.70
May 12 2017 08:35pm


deal with it
Member
Posts: 63,097
Joined: Jan 11 2005
Gold: 9,765.00
Warn: 60%
May 12 2017 08:50pm
Member
Posts: 40,852
Joined: Sep 17 2011
Gold: 0.00
May 13 2017 01:49pm
Quote (card_sultan @ 11 May 2017 23:00)
Ya of course its probable if 90 billion people lived on earth, I dont even link 90 billion people have live on earth - I heard its something like 70 billion, but anyway
you said its 99.9% probable, suggesting that its 99.9% likely all people will get struck by lightning twice in 5 minutes. Its actually .00000000001% probably that one person in the history of Earth this happen to.

So take your bs troll opinion, stuff it in a sausage and drive it deep up inside you.


No you blinking tool.

It's 99.9% likely according to my extremely rudimentary (and entirely unrepresentative of reality) math that at least one person in human history will have been hit by lightning twice.

Also I don't really care what you 'heard'. It's well over 100 billion by best estimates. You want to contradict that then quote a source. Not that it matters.

This is really simple stuff card. Super fucking simple. How can you claim to understand advanced physics that supposedly prove the earth to be flat when you can't even get your head around this simple concept?

Member
Posts: 63,097
Joined: Jan 11 2005
Gold: 9,765.00
Warn: 60%
May 13 2017 03:01pm
Quote (Scaly @ May 13 2017 09:49am)
that at least one person in human history will have been hit by lightning twice.


finally correct - but you said way back then:

Quote (Scaly @ May 7 2017 06:19pm)
there is a 99.9 recurring % chance for it to have happened already.


i know you meant .0000000001% chance in all of time itself but

If your odds of picking an Ace of Spades in a deck of cards are 1 in 52 but the first card you pick is an Ace of Spades, your odds haven't changed to 99.9% recurring because it happened

so your assertion that experts have concluded the video was fake because it doesn't fit the odds is just a typical wrong assumption on your part because you dont even understand odds.

What are the odds that a politician not winning the White House will happen - 1 in a million?

but it happened and there have been only 43 other presidents, Seem like the "experts" are pulling odds out of their anus while you misunderstand them, good grief.

Seems like very unlikely stuff is happening all the time now.

This post was edited by card_sultan on May 13 2017 03:02pm
Go Back To Science, Technology & Nature Topic List
Prev1153154155156157174Next
Closed New Topic New Poll