d2jsp
Log InRegister
d2jsp Forums > Off-Topic > General Chat > Science, Technology & Nature > Nasa Live Press-conference Feb22
Prev1141516171828Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll
Member
Posts: 52,224
Joined: Jan 3 2009
Gold: 8,902.00
Mar 3 2017 12:24pm
Quote (tard_sultan @ Mar 3 2017 11:30am)
So your issue is that their might be a God/Designer and he/she/it is in conflict with your faith?

So you're just a triggered Atheist, interesting.

And secondly i didn't even mention God, but you did mention High altitude satellites, So what is your proof they are real? What is your proof they can exist in 6500 degree temperature? What is your proof that sensitive electronic equipment can operate indefinitely in High EM Radiation like in or past the van allen belt? What is your proof that we can go beyond the impenetrable plasashere? What is your proof that rockets can operate in space? What is your proof that space is a vacuum?

You have no actual proof - just the word of Nasa who shows you pretty pictures to fap to. and tells you how to think. You have nothing else. Geocentricity offer many proofs you can test yourself, heliocentricity offers nothing.


I'm not an atheist. But I don't for a second fail to understand the difference between knowledge and faith. I have faith that God exists. I don't have knowledge that God exists.

You didn't have to mention God for me to draw the apt comparison.

What proof do you require for the existence of satellites to be valid? What constitutes irrefutable in your world? Because over here in reality, we know who makes them, we know who launches them, we know who and how they are tracked and controlled from the ground, we have the imagery they beam back to the surface, and so much more. What proof do you have that satellites do not exist? You have painful twists of logic that complain "well that just can't be," because you're so willfully ignorant.

Satellites don't "exist in 6500 degree temperatures." What fucking fantasy world are you in now?

What proof do you require that we can engineer machines to resist radiation? Would the existence of remote control robots that they use to try to repair the damaged nuclear plant at Fukushima suffice? How about nuclear missiles that are made to withstand EMPs so their guidance systems continue to function even when they are flying in second or third waves? What do you need man?

Why do you continue to claim that there's an impenetrable zone above us when A - that was one of your two sources that directly refute a flat Earth, and B - that I showed exactly what that article actually did say, not what you intentionally misconstrued it as?
Member
Posts: 63,097
Joined: Jan 11 2005
Gold: 9,765.00
Warn: 60%
Mar 3 2017 04:36pm
Quote (Santara @ Mar 3 2017 08:24am)
I'm not an atheist. But I don't for a second fail to understand the difference between knowledge and faith. I have faith that God exists. I don't have knowledge that God exists.

You didn't have to mention God for me to draw the apt comparison.

What proof do you require for the existence of satellites to be valid? What constitutes irrefutable in your world? Because over here in reality, we know who makes them, we know who launches them, we know who and how they are tracked and controlled from the ground, we have the imagery they beam back to the surface, and so much more. What proof do you have that satellites do not exist? You have painful twists of logic that complain "well that just can't be," because you're so willfully ignorant.

Satellites don't "exist in 6500 degree temperatures." What fucking fantasy world are you in now?

What proof do you require that we can engineer machines to resist radiation? Would the existence of remote control robots that they use to try to repair the damaged nuclear plant at Fukushima suffice? How about nuclear missiles that are made to withstand EMPs so their guidance systems continue to function even when they are flying in second or third waves? What do you need man?

Why do you continue to claim that there's an impenetrable zone above us when A - that was one of your two sources that directly refute a flat Earth, and B - that I showed exactly what that article actually did say, not what you intentionally misconstrued it as?


So basically you have no proof of Heliocentrism or that the world is a sphere - just your faith.

Pythagoras proved the world was flat 2500 years ago when he showed the math for a curved sphere and no one ever has been able to show the Earth has any curvature to it ever.

Learn his math and show me an actual experiment that can show me the curve that you say is there, till then you have nothing and your rage is nothing more than




cry motherfucker, go fudge yourself

This post was edited by card_sultan on Mar 3 2017 04:40pm
Member
Posts: 52,224
Joined: Jan 3 2009
Gold: 8,902.00
Mar 3 2017 05:30pm
Quote (tard_sultan @ Mar 3 2017 04:36pm)
So basically you have no proof of Heliocentrism or that the world is a sphere - just your faith.


Nope. You're just being intentionally stupid again. I quite clearly have and do assert that there are many proofs for heliocentricity, and that they have also been shown to you.

Pythagoras did nothing of the sort, and was a believer in a spherical Earth.

All the rest was monumental DODGE, chickenshit.
Member
Posts: 63,097
Joined: Jan 11 2005
Gold: 9,765.00
Warn: 60%
Mar 3 2017 06:18pm
Quote (Santara @ Mar 3 2017 01:30pm)
Nope. You're just being intentionally stupid again. I quite clearly have and do assert that there are many proofs for heliocentricity, and that they have also been shown to you.

Pythagoras did nothing of the sort, and was a believer in a spherical Earth.

All the rest was monumental DODGE, chickenshit.


Wrong again cupcake, you cant come up with an experiment to show the curve because there is no curve, Earth is 100% flat.

Member
Posts: 15,032
Joined: Apr 30 2008
Gold: 3.37
Mar 3 2017 07:02pm
Quote (card_sultan @ Mar 3 2017 07:18pm)
Wrong again cupcake, you cant come up with an experiment to show the curve because there is no curve, Earth is 100% flat.


But.




Here is a great example of how mankind came to believe in god, and the reality of faith.


The only reason people believe in god, is because they think it can lead to their salvation, but the moment they obtain that salvation, all thoughts of god are, rightly so, flushed down the toilet.

This post was edited by Ep0ch on Mar 3 2017 07:10pm
Member
Posts: 63,097
Joined: Jan 11 2005
Gold: 9,765.00
Warn: 60%
Mar 3 2017 07:15pm
Quote (Ep0ch @ Mar 3 2017 03:02pm)
But.
http://www.hashslush.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/02/best10_selfies_ever_hashslush8.jpg
http://static.comicvine.com/uploads/original/11113/111130453/4591791-5723500663-Curva.jpg
https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/c/c7/Mount-Everest.jpg/1920px-Mount-Everest.jpg

Here is a great example of how mankind came to believe in god, and the reality of faith.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y6F2wEcdGo8

The only reason people believe in god, is because they think it can lead to their salvation, but the moment they obtain that salvation, all thoughts of god are, rightly so, flushed down the toilet.


cool lense tricks - look i can make the sky curve into a ball, i bet you worship the sky ball god?



Member
Posts: 28,068
Joined: Apr 26 2010
Gold: 1,048.00
Mar 3 2017 07:17pm
Quote (card_sultan @ Mar 3 2017 09:15pm)
cool lense tricks - look i can make the sky curve into a ball, i bet you worship the sky ball god?

http://i.imgur.com/XQ4LMHe.jpg

what about their eyes? are their eyes playing some cool trick on them too?
Member
Posts: 15,032
Joined: Apr 30 2008
Gold: 3.37
Mar 3 2017 07:22pm
Quote (terry @ Mar 3 2017 08:17pm)
what about their eyes? are their eyes playing some cool trick on them too?


He was educated in springfield.
Member
Posts: 63,097
Joined: Jan 11 2005
Gold: 9,765.00
Warn: 60%
Mar 3 2017 08:54pm
Quote (terry @ Mar 3 2017 03:17pm)
what about their eyes? are their eyes playing some cool trick on them too?


The trick is with the lense and the resulting picture and thinking thats reality.

Sadly it only works on really dumb people. :(

Why is there no curve to the Earth in this picture - did the curve decide to go on vacation that day?



or this one - another vacation day for the curve?



Look at the bottom pic - Is the earth really only 20-30 miles in diameter?



This post was edited by card_sultan on Mar 3 2017 09:06pm
Member
Posts: 15,032
Joined: Apr 30 2008
Gold: 3.37
Mar 3 2017 09:59pm
Everything you have said is anecdotal.

Not every picture is taken with a shitty camera lens.

Just the one you choose to share.

-edit

Plus, all the photos you shared, save one, show mountains, mountains = not flat.

You have disproved your own hypothesis.

This post was edited by Ep0ch on Mar 3 2017 10:00pm
Go Back To Science, Technology & Nature Topic List
Prev1141516171828Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll