d2jsp
Log InRegister
d2jsp Forums > Off-Topic > General Chat > Science, Technology & Nature > Monolths
Prev1142143144145146174Next
Closed New Topic New Poll
Member
Posts: 52,224
Joined: Jan 3 2009
Gold: 8,902.00
May 8 2017 05:59pm
Put another way, Sydney is at 33 degrees south and 151 degrees east, and Johannesburg is at 26 degrees south and 28 degrees east. The angle between them from the north pole is 123 degrees. The distance from the north pole to Sydney is 8546 miles, and the distance to Johannesburg is 8018 miles. Knowing those dimensions, the length of the line between the two cities would be 14558 miles on a flat Earth. The range of a Boeing 777 dreamliner is 8555 miles. The range on a 747-400 is 8357 miles. How do the airlines make a flight from Sydney to Johannesburg?
Member
Posts: 63,097
Joined: Jan 11 2005
Gold: 9,765.00
Warn: 60%
May 8 2017 06:04pm
Quote (Santara @ May 8 2017 01:59pm)
Put another way, Sydney is at 33 degrees south and 151 degrees east, and Johannesburg is at 26 degrees south and 28 degrees east. The angle between them from the north pole is 123 degrees. The distance from the north pole to Sydney is 8546 miles, and the distance to Johannesburg is 8018 miles. Knowing those dimensions, the length of the line between the two cities would be 14558 miles on a flat Earth. The range of a Boeing 777 dreamliner is 8555 miles. The range on a 747-400 is 8357 miles. How do the airlines make a flight from Sydney to Johannesburg?


See you just dodged my question by claiming all flight paths are figured out by triangulating the distance from the North pole, the level of tardation you display is epic, stay deluded dude.
Member
Posts: 66,666
Joined: May 17 2005
Gold: 17,384.69
May 8 2017 06:42pm
Quote (card_sultan @ 8 May 2017 22:19)


all fake, you got manipulated like a puppet obviously

everything is synchronized

concave earth, hype !



:lol:
Member
Posts: 63,097
Joined: Jan 11 2005
Gold: 9,765.00
Warn: 60%
May 8 2017 06:53pm
Quote (Saucisson6000 @ May 8 2017 02:42pm)
all fake, you got manipulated like a puppet obviously

everything is synchronized

concave earth, hype !

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wC79vDkb-1c

:lol:


Id sooner believe in concave earth then ball earth, they have some good points.


to satan-tard:

look at that footage of the first flight from Frankfurt to Miami, at one point they are heading north and the next they are going west , then south - they make about 6-10 directional changes - if you wanna contend they are triangulation their route by calculating their current position to the North pole and Miami's position to the north pole and then using great circle navigation to find the straightest line of travel on a pretend globe, I guess Pilots are retarded or you're simply wrong. Not to mention the flat horizon all the way but people are like:

"I can see the curve from Airplanes" - no, no you cant.
Member
Posts: 7,324
Joined: Dec 22 2002
Gold: 1,261.00
May 8 2017 08:07pm
Quote (card_sultan @ May 8 2017 04:40pm)


actually - even if 90 billion people have lived on this earth - the odds are that only one has been hit by lightning twice in a few minutes, you understand what 1 in 90 billion means dont you?

the odds are like .0000000000001% not 99.9%, no wonder you dont understand anything - you're math challenged.

Prove that we need Gravity to work for bouncy to work, oh we dont gravity cause is actually ∅ and you have no proof of gravity - hmm isnt that special. :cry:


You think that math is NASA propaganda and can't grasp the most basic of concepts, but call me math challenged. Hilarious.

Buoyancy is the weight of displaced fluid, and weight means gravity. But hey, you are good at math and physics and such, right? How do YOU calculate the force of buoyancy for a particular object? What's the formula?
Member
Posts: 7,324
Joined: Dec 22 2002
Gold: 1,261.00
May 8 2017 08:20pm
Quote (card_sultan @ May 8 2017 04:57pm)
Because there are Highways in the sky to control traffic, take advantage of jetstreams and keep up the fakery because people like you cant handle the truth.

you failed to answer my question - how many airlines do this flight and what are the wind speeds of all jet streams along that path, stop dodging.


Right, this again. Every pilot, flight attendant, amateur radar operator, air traffic controller, aircraft maintenance technician, etc, is in on the great ball earth hoax. Amazing how well they keep the secret.
My in-laws said their neighbour is a flight attendant, wonder if I can get her drunk and get her to confess her Illuminati membership.

Have you ever considered that maybe nobody actually thinks the Earth is a ball? Maybe every single person that claims the earth is spherical is simply part of the conspiracy, and every person in the world is either trying to maintain the hoax or is actively fighting against it. It's simply such a massive conspiracy that billions of people are in on it.
Member
Posts: 52,224
Joined: Jan 3 2009
Gold: 8,902.00
May 8 2017 08:32pm
Quote (tard_sultan @ May 8 2017 06:40pm)
Wtf are you talking bout - triangle - looks like a semi straight line that goes nowhere near the north pole.

How many of these flight s are there?
Do you have accurate reading for jet streams along that path?


This is the Earth as you believe it exists:



Now you flattard people don't dispute latitude lines, so when you move 1 degree of latitude "south" from the north pole, no matter which direction, you have moved ~69 miles. It's the longitudinal lines you dispute. So on your supremely retarded flat disc Earth, trigonometry reigns supreme. If you know 3 measurements of a triangle, you can accurately calculate the other 3 (out of 3 angles, 3 sides). We know which direction both Sydney and Johannesburg are from your undisputed position of the north pole. They are 123 degrees apart. We also know the distance from the north pole for both of these cities, on a scale undisputed. Using this simple online calculator (for those of you who don't understand science, it's probably too much to ask you to understand math, so someone has done it for you) http://www.calculator.net/triangle-calculator.html ...all you need do is enter known, undisputed variables - in this case, 123 degrees and the two distances from the north pole of 8546 and 8018 for Sydney and Johannesburg respectively - and we can triangulate the distance between Sydney and Johannesburg using irrefutable numbers (so long as we assume the Earth actually is flat). In this case, if the Earth was flat, the two cities MUST be 14,558 miles apart. Yet somehow, Quantas and South Africa Airlines manage to send daily flights between the cities with aircraft that have a maximum range of less than 9,000 miles. They somehow manage to land planes ~14 hours and 10 minutes after they depart (jet stream notwithstanding) with aircraft that are not hypersonic. To fly 14,558 miles in 14 hours and 10 minutes, the aircraft must average 1027 mph, no matter which way the jet stream is pushing.

These are the optimal cruising speeds of the most common airliners in the world:

Quote
Airliners Optimum cruising Speeds (Mach)

Boeing 747-400 0.86
Boeing 787 0.85
Boeing 777 0.84
Boeing 767 0.80
Boeing 757 0.80
Boeing 737 -800 0.78
Boeing 737 - 300/400/500 0.74

Airbus 380 0.85
Airbus 340 -300/600 0.82
Airbus 330 0.82
Airbus 320 0.78
Airbus 310 0.78

McDonnell MD-11 0.85


The 777, in case you wanted to know, can't surpass .89 mach, which is WAY below 1027 mph. The jet stream simply can't make up that much difference, and especially not for aircraft flying both ways simultaneously.

Quote (tard_sultan @ May 8 2017 06:57pm)
Because there are Highways in the sky to control traffic, take advantage of jetstreams and keep up the fakery because people like you cant handle the truth.

you failed to answer my question - how many airlines do this flight and what are the wind speeds of all jet streams along that path, stop dodging.


Dodging? You have no fucking place calling out other people dodgers. I was writing that last reply the same time you were, stupid. And now, I have answered and demolished your shit argument with simple trig and a calm understanding of physics.

Quote (tard_sultan @ May 8 2017 07:04pm)
See you just dodged my question by claiming all flight paths are figured out by triangulating the distance from the North pole, the level of tardation you display is epic, stay deluded dude.


No, you stupid fuck, that is not what I claimed. What I DID claim was that by using metrics you yourself CAN'T DENY, I have mathematically disproven a flat Earth.

Quote (tard_sultan @ May 8 2017 07:53pm)
look at that footage of the first flight from Frankfurt to Miami, at one point they are heading north and the next they are going west , then south - they make about 6-10 directional changes - if you wanna contend they are triangulation their route by calculating their current position to the North pole and Miami's position to the north pole and then using great circle navigation to find the straightest line of travel on a pretend globe, I guess Pilots are retarded or you're simply wrong. Not to mention the flat horizon all the way but people are like:

"I can see the curve from Airplanes" - no, no you cant.


Triangulation based upon the north pole is not what happens in the real world simpleton, that's not how great circle navigation works.

I don't know how many times this has to be pointed out to you: people can't perceive the curvature of the Earth from airline altitudes. But just so you know, there IS CURVATURE all throughout that video, because it was filmed with... get this... a distorted lens, which you can see VERY CLEARLY at 3:57 and again at 7:01. It's astounding that you call a video filmed with a curvature the entire time is proof that there is NO CURVE. It's like... you're a fucking liar or something.




Tard, you just got fucking demolished. With your own source. Again. You should just hide your head in shame, shut your stupid mouth, and move on with your utterly wretched life without dragging people down with you with this stupid, thoroughly debunked bullshit.

This post was edited by Santara on May 8 2017 08:35pm
Member
Posts: 63,097
Joined: Jan 11 2005
Gold: 9,765.00
Warn: 60%
May 8 2017 10:48pm
Quote (Supertard @ May 8 2017 04:32pm)
This is the Earth as you believe it exists:

http://i.imgur.com/X3JrnOE.png

Now you flattard people don't dispute latitude lines, so when you move 1 degree of latitude "south" from the north pole, no matter which direction, you have moved ~69 miles. It's the longitudinal lines you dispute. So on your supremely retarded flat disc Earth, trigonometry reigns supreme. If you know 3 measurements of a triangle, you can accurately calculate the other 3 (out of 3 angles, 3 sides). We know which direction both Sydney and Johannesburg are from your undisputed position of the north pole. They are 123 degrees apart. We also know the distance from the north pole for both of these cities, on a scale undisputed. Using this simple online calculator (for those of you who don't understand science, it's probably too much to ask you to understand math, so someone has done it for you) http://www.calculator.net/triangle-calculator.html ...all you need do is enter known, undisputed variables - in this case, 123 degrees and the two distances from the north pole of 8546 and 8018 for Sydney and Johannesburg respectively - and we can triangulate the distance between Sydney and Johannesburg using irrefutable numbers (so long as we assume the Earth actually is flat). In this case, if the Earth was flat, the two cities MUST be 14,558 miles apart. Yet somehow, Quantas and South Africa Airlines manage to send daily flights between the cities with aircraft that have a maximum range of less than 9,000 miles. They somehow manage to land planes ~14 hours and 10 minutes after they depart (jet stream notwithstanding) with aircraft that are not hypersonic. To fly 14,558 miles in 14 hours and 10 minutes, the aircraft must average 1027 mph, no matter which way the jet stream is pushing.

These are the optimal cruising speeds of the most common airliners in the world:



The 777, in case you wanted to know, can't surpass .89 mach, which is WAY below 1027 mph. The jet stream simply can't make up that much difference, and especially not for aircraft flying both ways simultaneously.





Dodging? You have no fucking place calling out other people dodgers. I was writing that last reply the same time you were, stupid. And now, I have answered and demolished your shit argument with simple trig and a calm understanding of physics.



No, you stupid fuck, that is not what I claimed. What I DID claim was that by using metrics you yourself CAN'T DENY, I have mathematically disproven a flat Earth.



Triangulation based upon the north pole is not what happens in the real world simpleton, that's not how great circle navigation works.

I don't know how many times this has to be pointed out to you: people can't perceive the curvature of the Earth from airline altitudes. But just so you know, there IS CURVATURE all throughout that video, because it was filmed with... get this... a distorted lens, which you can see VERY CLEARLY at 3:57 and again at 7:01. It's astounding that you call a video filmed with a curvature the entire time is proof that there is NO CURVE. It's like... you're a fucking liar or something.





Tard, you just got fucking demolished. With your own source. Again. You should just hide your head in shame, shut your stupid mouth, and move on with your utterly wretched life without dragging people down with you with this stupid, thoroughly debunked bullshit.


Dude your a joke, you just dodged my question again while spewing your retarded logic, you should be tarred and feather, and put in the corner for everyone to laugh at what a complete dunce and failure of an excuse for a person you are. Take your statist propaganda and shove it where the sun dont shine.

So how do you know optimal cruising speed in anywhere near max cruising speed, my car has an optimal moving speed - 55 mph - but it can go 120 mph - quite the difference. Any proof here?

Post some evidence of distance traveled with odometer/speedometer/jet stream readings for every point and altitude on earth because you claim to know them.

Stop dodging bitch.

The video shows the flat earth btw - there is a tiny curve but you can tell that is lense distortion because you see the same curve on the ground

if you can't see it it because your retarded, stop dragging people down into your retarded logic of lies, i hear it all the time , i see the curve from airplanes, and then i show there's no curve and then it s like - "oh well of course you can't see the curve - we're to small!"

So boats go over the horizon at 3 miles out but you cant see the curve from 6 miles up because we're to small - make up your mind tard which is it? Small is about right - tiny brain syndrome is a real spherechukker problem that affects all of us regular people.



I suppose we need stupid people like yourself, my retirement is guaranteed by your cluelessness, so ty for that. :P



This post was edited by card_sultan on May 8 2017 11:12pm
Member
Posts: 51,221
Joined: Jun 3 2010
Gold: 0.69
Warn: 50%
May 8 2017 11:29pm
Quote (russian @ May 8 2017 06:41pm)
Card, you do realize that people have lived on this planet before you, right? That the 7 billion currently alive aren't the only humans that have ever existed?
Hmm... how do I explain it for someone of your modest brainpower to understand. It's like eating candy. You might only have 10 pieces of candy at home right now, but that doesn't mean you've only ever eaten 10 pieces of candy in your life. Does that make sense?


So trayvon was killed for eating people? Why did the trial take so long?
Member
Posts: 63,908
Joined: Jun 26 2009
Gold: 169.70
May 9 2017 02:11am
here's one for the physicists who are still in denial:

Go Back To Science, Technology & Nature Topic List
Prev1142143144145146174Next
Closed New Topic New Poll