Quote (tard_sultan @ May 5 2017 11:27am)
Wait so the guy who posted on a debunking site , his proof is a review post on amazon?
omg thats so funny, nice scientific proof - a multi.
Ok, let me get this straight – The Government never conspires if someone talks about it on utube/internet – but a Goverment propaganda site on the internet that does nothing but find stupid excuses for you to taught as “evidence” is more credible to you? Wow, that's pretty pathetic.
Foucault's pendulum would be Empirical except it is does stops swinging at some point, does the Earth stop spinning too? Also Eclipses disrupt its swing. Could the rotation of the swing be do to the magnetic rotation of the sun, moon and stars. Airy's Failure is an experiment that failed to prove the Earth was spinning and it is the stars that spin. Basically its a large string bob that tricks the mind with its centripetal swings that reacts to the magnetic rotation of the sun and stars that goes around Earth.
Stellar Parallax hasn't changed in thousands of years yet the Earth spins around the Milky way at 500,000 mph, so not blindly believing that one.
Nikon P900 camera footage with a 2000m zoom suggests the stars are not burning balls of gas but just a result of Sonoluminescence.
Great Circle Navigation - oh is that the one that uses the Azimuth equidistant map as shows distances on a flat plane?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rYTDsdofCFc
Gyroscopes are useful for measuring or managing orientation because it maintains its rigidity in space and so the inner gimbal can be used to detect the rotation of the Earth about its axis because it seeks its true north, rather than the magnetic north
That video about debunking myth busters did not prove rockets allow combustion to occur in a vacuum
because the first two experiment showed combustion would not happen and the third one – the rocket only worked because he enclosed the rocket in a separate enclosed sealed tube, as soon as the force of the rocket blew off the seal, thus making that chamber a vacuum as well, the rocket did not work anymore, the reason his stick propeller still showed spin was because of the force of the rocket exploding inside a non vacuum and the force it created allowed spin of his stick but you can see it was slowing down, because the rocket no longer worked.
Actually its quality sphere-chucker wrecking, if it wasn't you would try so hard, but it is cute to see you utterly fail over and over.
One of the very many points in the debunking included the poor reviews of the altimeter. They used Google Earth as well as other software to replicate the position the photo was taken from, and with publicly available data, they were able to show that the photo was taken 100+ feet higher in elevation than his altimeter said he was. But just keep dodging that McIntyre himself admitted his video was shit so that you can pretend that reality didn't just rain down on you like a ton of bricks.
Not even sure exactly what you're trying to address with your next pair of thought-disjuncted sentences.
That the pendulum stops swinging does not change the fact that it demonstrates the rotation while it is swinging. Holy fucking derp. There is no such thing as Airy's failure, because there wasn't a failure, except in understanding everything at play in the experiment. More learned people pointed this out at the time.
There you go, YET AGAIN, showing off your spectacular inability to understand the differences between absolute motions and relative motions. Is continually showing off a mental deficiency a defense mechanism for you?
No, great circle navigation does not depend on a flat Earth map. It relies on flat maps and mathematical conversions of courses to achieve the shortest distance from one point to another. All of the world's ocean shipping and all of the world's airline traffic use it to minimize fuel expenses and travel times.
...and what, pray tell, does the Earth's mass and linear velocity have to do with a gyroscope "measuring or managing orientation?" Be precise, because you keep bringing it up as if it mattered.
Yes, it did. Maybe you missed how that tiny capsule was demolished? You want to pretend that a miniature initial flash of rocket did that? The rocket needed the tube's pressure, as the author noted. The pressure was almost instantly lost, but it was enough to fire the rocket and allow it to burn up, which it did.