another blatant lie from a liar, when will you offer any proof of your helios ball fantasy instead of just your incessant trolling, typical statist.

This post was edited by card_sultan on May 4 2017 04:31pm

Change positions, like how your video source actually had his picture located at 5480 feet?
No, not debunked on Amazon. Debunked here: https://www.metabunk.org/debunked-view-of-blue-ridge-mountains-impossible-on-spherical-earth.t7941/ Amazon was where his altimeter had bad reviews.
No, the only thing that's obvious is the extents to which you're willing to contort yourself into a pretzel trying to avoid admitting just how wrong all of your proofs have been. All of them.
Yes he did, and russian completely set you straight on it.

Do you even know WHAT gyroscopes detect? I don't think you do.

Foucault's pendulum is empirical. Great circle navigation is empirical. Stellar parallax is empirical.
Yes, you did compare them, because you brought it up in rebuttal. Don't try to pass it off as some moronic random thought you just decided to write about out of the blue.
Holy shit. Your video proved rockets continued burning in vacuum, and because some stupid motherfucker (was it you?) captioned the video with "hurr durr that's bullshit cuz NASA splutter derp," that all of a sudden it's a debunking? LOOOOOL!

Quality flattard wrecking. Would read again.

Proof that you don't understand geometry? You are a flat earther. What more is there to say? You think the horizon is due to "the plane of the earth rising up to meet the plane of the sky, at a perspective vanishing point". You think that looking at a ball you would always see a full half of it. You think that taller objects (like mountains) can hide behind shorter ones on a flat plane. You think that vertical lines moving away from you don't appear to converge, but horizontal ones do. You don't understand WHY said lines appear to converge.
I could go on for a while here, but I think that will do for now.

Or maybe it's just more confortable for your fragile mind to sit on those kind of ideas.
I think i can understand what is happening, im sorry for you, buddy

Wait so the guy who posted on a debunking site , his proof is a review post on amazon?

omg thats so funny, nice scientific proof - a multi.

Ok, let me get this straight – The Government never conspires if someone talks about it on utube/internet – but a Goverment propaganda site on the internet that does nothing but find stupid excuses for you to taught as “evidence” is more credible to you? Wow, that's pretty pathetic.

Foucault's pendulum would be Empirical except it is does stops swinging at some point, does the Earth stop spinning too? Also Eclipses disrupt its swing. Could the rotation of the swing be do to the magnetic rotation of the sun, moon and stars. Airy's Failure is an experiment that failed to prove the Earth was spinning and it is the stars that spin. Basically its a large string bob that tricks the mind with its centripetal swings that reacts to the magnetic rotation of the sun and stars that goes around Earth.

Stellar Parallax hasn't changed in thousands of years yet the Earth spins around the Milky way at 500,000 mph, so not blindly believing that one.
Nikon P900 camera footage with a 2000m zoom suggests the stars are not burning balls of gas but just a result of Sonoluminescence.


Great Circle Navigation - oh is that the one that uses the Azimuth equidistant map as shows distances on a flat plane?



Gyroscopes are useful for measuring or managing orientation because it maintains its rigidity in space and so the inner gimbal can be used to detect the rotation of the Earth about its axis because it seeks its true north, rather than the magnetic north

That video about debunking myth busters did not prove rockets allow combustion to occur in a vacuum
because the first two experiment showed combustion would not happen and the third one – the rocket only worked because he enclosed the rocket in a separate enclosed sealed tube, as soon as the force of the rocket blew off the seal, thus making that chamber a vacuum as well, the rocket did not work anymore, the reason his stick propeller still showed spin was because of the force of the rocket exploding inside a non vacuum and the force it created allowed spin of his stick but you can see it was slowing down, because the rocket no longer worked.



Actually its quality sphere-chucker wrecking, if it wasn't you would try so hard, but it is cute to see you utterly fail over and over.



This post was edited by card_sultan on May 5 2017 10:32am

This is your claim, the burden of proof is on you, what is your proof - or do you have none and this is just more of your typical lying dishonest self?



Close but wrong as usual. The horizon is due to your eyesight, it is the point where the 3d perspective Matrix make distant land optically appear to rise, it doesn't actually rise though, do you understand it's an optical trick of 3d perspective , not the actual curve of the Earth?

So I hear ballers claim that we humans are too small to see the curve of the earth but then they also claim to see boats going over the curve? So which is it, you can't have it both ways - unless you're a swinger.



Yeah its called moving your head a few centimeters and changing your line of sight - this is your problem you actually only think in 2d, good grief - i'm amazed sometimes you manage to function.



This is just yourself lying as usual, do you understand that perspective has 3 dimensions not just 2, and that they are oriented to your visual direction. Railroad tracks appear to converge because they are optically traversing the x axis on a flat plane, buildings on the y axis do not converge, if you walk up to a building and look up - youve changed the orientation of your perspective by making what was the y axis - the x axis and now they appear to converge. This is just you shifting the goalposts and not even understanding that you are.


This post was edited by card_sultan on May 5 2017 11:05am

I gave you a link for my sources, if you choose to ignore scientific fact while not even offering an alternative, it's obvious you're just triggered and trolling and why Flat Earth has more videos on youtube than just about everything

it's ok buddy, i get it, you wake up in the morning, check out all arround yourself and ..; "oh wait, its flat, everything is flat, they are a lying to me!"

then you are opening the tv, hearing news and then learn about copernic or scientists all arround, saying the world is spherical, a planet, and then... "oh fuck they want to brainwash me with their lies, i will not be their toy!"

Then you come here in jsp, and... "ahah look, it's flat i told you!"



That cool buddy, the simpler the better.

So you imagine me walking around naked, and how long have you had this fantasy, please sit down on this couch and tell me more...

Do you believe in a ball because you saw a picture from Nasa on tv, its fine - most do.

I saw a picture on a tv too, must be real....






This post was edited by card_sultan on May 5 2017 12:59pm