So you have no proof of your assumptions, but were just supposed to assume your assumptions are correct, I guess because were all social creatures who evolved from goo?

K - now i understand Nastard Logic

This post was edited by card_sultan on May 3 2017 11:54am

Yep, the rest of the video is 15 pages later. So let me get this straight, here's what happened:

You claimed that rockets do not work in space and that you have proof of it
The "proof" was really just to establish that the environment the real proof will be shown in is vacuum
You posted the real proof 1 week and 15 pages later.

Is that what you are trying to say right now?

So you have your pages set at 10 and your a 2002, wtf is your computer from 2002, what are you rocking there a 386?

So yes, the point i was making is that combustion cannot take place in a vacuum, i watched the full video weeks ago, so when i posted that first video, I agree that it was not complete in its scope and was just a clip of the entire video, thus i posted 3 more videos, none of which you watched, those 386 computers weren't to good with video were they?

there are too many variables to make a specific assumption, that's my point. in other words, i'm doing the opposite of assuming.

Actually your assuming the world is a ball, and that rockets work in space - I'm mean like their rocket scientist's right?

Rocket scientist cannot lie, its like physically impossible for them.

Look up the Apollo 11 Press Conference, Astro-nots were obviously their not to good at lying.

Yes, MY computer is exactly the reason why it took YOU a full week to post more.
In reality we all know you just have no idea how rocket thrust works, so you thought that a fan not working in vacuum means rockets don't work either.

but



and

04/25 - https://youtu.be/xCsocm4Yngg
04/29 - https://youtu.be/j9owSzReG38
05/01 - https://youtu.be/iysrL6stnNY
05/02 - https://youtu.be/ESbnAWHxp4U
05/02 - https://youtu.be/Q8IRFSPLV60

and i would never say a fan not working is the reason rockets dont work, if fact i stated that i think the fan was to prove that the inside was a vacuum

The reason rockets dont work in space is because combustion is impossible in a near perfect vacuum and even if you were to create combustion in a specialized sealed chamber - i fail to see how 8500 ° heat and force of the thrust from combustion could maintain a solid seal between a pressurized chamber and a vacuum. The reason for "15 pages" is just troll logic from triggered idiots and i can't control that.

Even Nasa agrees that rockets dont work in space, this is nothing new - this is why every single realistic space movie they talk about needing to orbiting the planet to pick up speed, this whole exercise was to prove that some people just need to troll.

This post was edited by card_sultan on May 3 2017 01:11pm

rocket scientists can lie, so can anyone making up an experiment for a youtube video on why the earth is flat. That's another massive bit of hypocrisy that you employ, any time someone posts a picture or video you discount it with "lol nasa lies" but no actual proof. And any time someone questions the accuracy of your videos you all of a sudden require a different standard of proof where in they need to provide data for every single thing.

but hey, im sure you have a really good reason for assuming anything that doesnt conform to your worldview is a "nasa lie" right? right?

You're right everyone can lie but here's the difference:

you - "look at what this scientist says, scientist are smart therefore you must believe them"

me - "that's great you worship them but heres some empirical and logical evidence that is actually different from your blind trust assumptions"

You say i post "no proof that Nasa lies - well that's not true here some more proof that Nasa lies - whether or not you watch it is up to you



I like the part at 3:42 were Alan Bean says its not from closing your eyes and then 5 seconds later he explains you need to close your eyes.

I mean really, hes lying right to your face and you can't even tell. Um ok - i'm the jerk for pointing out all the circle jerk logic, how dare I.

This post was edited by card_sultan on May 3 2017 01:35pm

Me - "what proof do you have of _______"

You - "look here's this youtube video, even the title says it 100% proves it, and it's labelled "nasa scientists hate this" so you know it's true"

the fact you can't see this relationship goes both ways is a bit astounding. you see, i'm not denying that scientists make incorrect assumptions or that some lie in order to appear correct or confirm their biases, you on the other hand will triple down on a shitty basement created video in such shameful fashion it boggles the mind.

if we're going to doubt things without needing to prove they are worthy of doubt we all fall down the slippery slope.



another incorrect assumption that has led you to a strawman argument. im not suggesting nasa never lies, of course they have and do, however you assume nasa ALWAYS lies. or near enough that you can't trust literally anything. you use this unilateral mistrust as a way to instantly discount posted sources without actually arguing the underlying physics.

"oh you posted a nasa source, nice try. Fake news!"


This post was edited by thesnipa on May 3 2017 01:29pm