I like how your claiming a low pressure volume while thesniptard is claiming high pressure volume, you guys need to get your story straight instead of your blatant lies and troll logic.

This post was edited by card_sultan on May 3 2017 10:39am

You posted 1 video and 1 gif. Proof:



That's an unedited quote of your post, as you posted it. Hard to believe you would lie so blatantly, when it's so easy to verify exactly what and when you posted.

And as ive said the rest of the video is here:

http://forums.d2jsp.org/topic.php?t=72993427&f=90&o=1321

I guess your low intelligence is incapable of seeing anything else beyond your own narrow tunnel vision.

Now stop dodging , you were asked to explain that carrot graphic, why are you dodging, is that all you do - dodge and lie?

I see card is in full "im rubber you're glue" mode. makes sense honestly.

thinking that asking for proof of your assumptions is a "Im rubber you're glue" comment is some next level retardation, well done.

I guess this is what happens when you paint yourself into a corner and start reaching for straw-man to get you out.

This post was edited by card_sultan on May 3 2017 11:18am

i could go farther down the rabbit hole with you on this, but tbh, once i asked for proof to back up your video and you posted the video as said proof i just laughed and backed away.

you've been dodging the relationship between these 3 things and the implications it has on your claims for a few pages now:

1. fans in a vacuum
2. compressed air in a vacuum
3. combustion engine in a vacuum

but please post the video to explain your thoughts on the video again if you must. i'm sure we'd all like to not watch it again.



just another line you stole from us. hint: that's what "i'm rubber you're glue" means. it's literally taking a criticism of you and tossing it back.

This post was edited by thesnipa on May 3 2017 11:23am

That you dont watch anything besides your own bias in order to remain a blind monkey is pretty clear.

Keep posting more assumptions without feeling the need to offer any proof, because you have none.

This post was edited by card_sultan on May 3 2017 11:35am

i said "not watch again" not "not watch, again". but i understand your need to make assumptions off of the context that best fits your worldview.

So you have no data as to how combustion would physically work different in a high pressure vs low pressure environment, ok stay blind.

and in that example i said "sealed chamber" - which is not a higher pressured environment - that's your stupid assumption.

This post was edited by card_sultan on May 3 2017 11:46am

your request is nonsensical. it would depend on what is being combusted, the design of the chamber, the pressures, etc. thats literally my entire point, that your video can't disprove an entire concept because there are too many variables.

it's a common mistake of flat earthers, they feel that imperfect comparisons are adequate to disprove a much larger set of variables. then once it's flipped on its head (hint: as russian did to you with ease) you cry "imperfect comparison" without recognizing the irony.

then when asked point blank to show where ur video makes a perfect comparison, crickets......

This post was edited by thesnipa on May 3 2017 11:51am