d2jsp
Log InRegister
d2jsp Forums > Off-Topic > General Chat > Science, Technology & Nature > Humans Are The Pinnacle Of Evolution.
Prev1121314
Add Reply New Topic New Poll
Member
Posts: 9,412
Joined: Nov 18 2009
Gold: 20.00
Dec 15 2014 01:07pm
Quote (Thor123422 @ Dec 8 2014 01:59am)
Yes, they were all human like, and that has all of nothing to do with the price of eggs in china.  There are plenty of animals set to take our place as the most intelligent species should we die off, and even if all apes died off, and even if all monkeys died off.  You just drew an arbitrary line saying "but, we diverged kind of recently!" instead of acknowledging you were wrong.  Move them goal posts, move em on back.

We manipulate our environment to some extent, but we haven't terraformed the earth or an unhospitable planet.  We've torn down some forests, dug some trenches, and increased the temperature of the earth by a few degrees, but we aren't going to transform the bottom of the ocean to an environment hospitable to humans and if the environment we choose to transform to our own benefit isn't adjascent to, or already rich with resources we can use there's not much survival going on.  There's a huge portion of desert where humans don't and cannot live, same for the artic.

Billions of people probably shouldn't exist, a basic biology course will go over carrying capacity and population crashes.  When the population goes over the carrying capacity the whole thing can collapse, so the number of humans alive today is also an irrelevant detail.



Really what this comes down to is I'm trying to explain integrals to somebody who doesn't know how to multiply, except change math to biology.  Explanations are going straight over your head because you  just don't know the facts.  I'm not saying anything controvertial, I'm basically parroting what every single biology book will tell you, that there is no pinnacle of evolution.


"there is no pinnacle of evolution" I already agreed with you on this in a previous post near the beginning of this discussion.

That is not the core of my argument. I used "pinnacle" for lack of a better word.

My argument is that what humans do goes beyond evolution.

It is consciously aware self adaptation through technology and environmental augmentation. Yet you won't concede this self-evident point.

It is almost as if you are blindly contrarian.
Member
Posts: 30,432
Joined: Dec 28 2010
Gold: 134.69
Dec 15 2014 01:12pm
Quote (PixileDust @ Dec 15 2014 02:07pm)
"there is no pinnacle of evolution" I already agreed with you on this in a previous post near the beginning of this discussion.

That is not the core of my argument. I used "pinnacle" for lack of a better word.

My argument is that what humans do goes beyond evolution.


"evolution" is the word objected to, not pinnacle, it is obvious you think humans are the pinnacle of something (not sure what that something is, but it's not evolution)

e: pattern recognition? (long term)


This post was edited by dude_927 on Dec 15 2014 01:14pm
Member
Posts: 9,412
Joined: Nov 18 2009
Gold: 20.00
Dec 15 2014 01:16pm
Quote (dude_927 @ Dec 15 2014 01:12pm)
"evolution" is the word objected to, not pinnacle, it is obvious you think humans are the pinnacle of something (not sure what that something is, but it not evolution)


Absolutely wrong. What I am describing is patently a form of evolution.

A definition of evolution from google: the gradual development of something, especially from a simple to a more complex form.

Environmental augmentation/technology evolves due to human manipulation over time, leading to higher quality of living for humans.

This is not a random process, it is a guided evolution.
Member
Posts: 30,432
Joined: Dec 28 2010
Gold: 134.69
Dec 15 2014 01:27pm
Quote (PixileDust @ Dec 15 2014 02:16pm)
Absolutely wrong. What I am describing is patently a form of evolution.


uhh no, because evolution doesn't have a pinnacle, use a scientific dictionary in the science section please, it might help you to see why "the gradual development of something, especially from a simple to a more complex form." is a stupid definition.
Member
Posts: 64,763
Joined: Oct 25 2006
Gold: 0.00
Dec 15 2014 07:47pm
Quote (PixileDust @ Dec 15 2014 01:07pm)
"there is no pinnacle of evolution" I already agreed with you on this in a previous post near the beginning of this discussion.

That is not the core of my argument. I used "pinnacle" for lack of a better word.

My argument is that what humans do goes beyond evolution.

It is consciously aware self adaptation through technology and environmental augmentation. Yet you won't concede this self-evident point.

It is almost as if you are blindly contrarian.


Yeah but then you say crap like we are the best ever at manipulating our environment and definitely have the best selected for traits ever. What humans do doesn't go beyond evolution, we are still evolving even if it's slow enough it's difficult for the laymen to see

This post was edited by Thor123422 on Dec 15 2014 07:48pm
Member
Posts: 20,508
Joined: Aug 6 2008
Gold: 450.92
Jan 8 2015 10:21pm
Quote (PixileDust @ Oct 30 2014 09:16pm)
We are the pinnacle of the phenomenon known as "life."

Billions of years of evolution has lead to humans which are undoubtedly the alpha species.

Should we not attempt to further science and technology to help proliferate ourselves throughout the universe?

I think it is too risky to stay on one planet; we are too valuable from a scientific perspective.



Alpha species? what does that even mean? I think we are the most intelligent species on earth, but something 1/billionth your size can wipe u out, like ebola... If you are naked and afraid in the jungle... do you think u are the alpha?

And "too valuable"? Too valuable to what? to who? Perhaps u have some insight into the meaning of life?

Its important to advance science and technology if we want our species to continue. and perhaps expand our capabilities as a species.


Im not trying to bash your points or views, I just see some holes in these points you are trying to make. But I am all for discussion and I found your post interesting enough to reply, so thanks for you contribution to science.
Go Back To Science, Technology & Nature Topic List
Prev1121314
Add Reply New Topic New Poll