please, your another one who blew his mind over the blue marble picture even when it has major problems with it, still waiting for those 3d graphics of the flat horizon on a sphere, dodge more.

All you ballers do is dodge, i posted proof the mountains prove flat earth, debunkers claimed it was just line of sight , but of course it's not line of sight, so you dodge.

Gyros proof flat earth, Santara claimed only a special gyro can detect procession, but in the video he actually showed the gyro reacting to procession and the force of the planet spinning at 1000 mph is much greater and so his excuse is nothing more than a dodge.

Rainbows prove Flat Earth and no one could make a rainbow indoors with a light and a few drops of liquid water, so a tard froze 2 feet of water into a solid block thereby allowing multiple refractions and shifting the goal posts, so basically a dodge.

Rockets dont work in a vacuum, so what does Santard do - dodge by claiming the rockets are in a pressurized chamber which is just a plagiarized excuse from a youtube video that claims to debunk how rockets dont work in a vacuum but actually proves it. In this video it shows how cognitive bias takes over and globeheads dont even realize it. First it shows rockets not working in a vacuum, than he realizes you can shift the goal posts by putting the rocket in a separate pressured chamber inside a vacuum, but as soon as the combustion breaks the seal on his pressured chamber - hes just back to the same issue - rockets not working in a vacuum. Supreme dodge, intellectually challenged and grave dishonesty.



Truly pathetic how desperate ballers are to try and push blatant lies.

This post was edited by card_sultan on May 1 2017 11:42am

am i supposed to be upset at being called a "baller". I just thought up a catchy nickname for flat earthers, morons. feel free to refer to yourself this way if you'd like.

See how you need to resort to insulting personal strawman attacks so no one will notice your dodge, you are truly a pathetic waste of skin.

Ball Earth is being destroyed and more people are waking up to the trickery used by Nasa.

Here's an example of circular logic that Nasa uses:



This post was edited by card_sultan on May 1 2017 12:04pm

oh you have me mistaken sir. i'm never making the mistake of earnestly speaking with you again. you're simply not worthy of any of my effort any more.

i'm just going to read along and point out your more glaring errors and pathetic dodge attempts.

its always nice to see your posts that looks like a random generation of the criticisms hurled at you though. keep it up!

Dude you rage and insulted me 10 times because i wouldn't blindly accept your sticky picture from Nasa like you do, your cognitive dissonance makes you cling to excuses and dodge when cornered like you're doing here.

Nothing you say has any value and you even posting your troll comment is pointless as is anything you do.

This post was edited by card_sultan on May 1 2017 12:37pm

only poor people who haven't been to space on a spacex vacation believe the earth is flat

where in my post did i deny that i tried to help you in the past? all i'm saying is i can no longer try to help you understand middle school physics experiments.

i'm now more of a big picture type helper, you know the massive glaring errors instead of nitpicking. Such as, "slinkies ARE springs. but i'm not going to waste my time explaining the nuances of something so simple."

I think i understand your strategy:

1 Shift the goal post by clinging to an excuse
2 Troll
3 Dodge
4 Insult
5 Strawman

repeat circlejerk logic as necessary.



I can't wait till SpaceX claims to take people to Mars, i'm sure they will have a giant list of Nastards who can't wait to sign up!

This post was edited by card_sultan on May 1 2017 12:57pm

i think it would be more accurately this:

1 try for years just to have a constructive conversation
2 try for years just to get you to own your own shit while insulting you
3 eventually realize some people are beyond any chance of help

the truth is you don't need a science teacher, you need a psychiatrist to address the underlying issues that cause you to reject science over your own mistrust of authority figures. then again a psychiatrist is an authority figure, so here we are.

This post was edited by thesnipa on May 1 2017 12:57pm

See this is your issue - I dont reject real science - i reject theoretical astro science whose dogma is used to control popular opinion.

The computer that your using atm is real science, the big bang theory is just that - a theory - it affects nothing actual real and can't explain which came first - the gravity to create mass or the mass to create gravity.

If you stopped believing in the big bang, absolutely nothing would change, except you would realize its all just your blind faith.