Quote (tard_sultan @ Apr 28 2017 12:14pm)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GY13-H7U_Og
Holy fuck, you made that video yourself. You had to, because it's the most retarded motherfucking thing I've seen all year. Notice how they claim the Earth has to be flat because they can't see curvature at airline altitudes? As if anyone claims you can detect the curvature at 35,000 feet. Know what else is stupid as fuck about your video? All the views of the horizon are blocked by cloud cover. Know what isn't blocked? Views of motherfucking rockets gaining more than double the 35,000 foot altitude of an airliner in 60 seconds. If we were talking linear speed, that's about 800 mph. Except that it isn't linear speed, it had to start at 0 and accelerate. I seem to remember you saying rockets can't accelerate very well. And what's with a full half of the video being devoted to unicorns and rhinoceroses? Does that have anything at all to do with the BEST PROOF YET FOR A FLAT EARTH?
This just in everyone: a rhino goring water buffalo PROVES THE FUCKING EARTH IS FLAT!!!!!!!
Holy shit, could you POSSIBLY find a more retarded video in your entire life?
Quote (tard_sultan @ Apr 28 2017 12:14pm)
Nasa is the one lying to you, this is the reason you're are at the bottom of the stupid ladder. There's only one ladder in this scenario, btw.
You believe a handful of guys in the military over thousand and thousands of people who dont believe those liars.
And no you didn't demolish the burning stuff in a vacuum video, you just raged about how combustion works in space because
you were "taught" that and showed a paid for advertisement on a popular science debunking tv show that propagandized something that only they are saying.
SpaceX showed the curve of Earth -lol :rofl: you mean the go-pro wide angle view that curves the horizon - yeah its fukkng hilarious people still fall for that one.
Yes, a tv show told me that Nasa was snatching canisters of live/exposed Negative film out of the sky with Airplanes in the 70s. It coulda been all satire or it coulda been real. Anyway it was on the Nasa unexplained files on the Science Channel. They were showing a mountain in turkey in a B+W aerial spy photograph from the 1970s, to me it looked like it coulda been shot from an u2 spy plane, but the story went that this photo was from a satellite in the 70s, and since they didn't have the technology to digitally send picture data back then, that this satellite took this picture, then shot a canister of this negative film back to earth where it be snatched out of the air by Military pilots. IT certainly made me laugh, but this is the shit Nasa wants you to believe, c'mon man.
I'm not admitting that we can go to actual space, however rockets can go to low earth altitude and you're told that is space through visual trickery.
How does a vacuum exist under a dome?
Well first off there some debate in the Flat Earth community whether there is a dome or not and secondly no one claims that area of "space" is a vacuum but some kind of aether or liquid or water.
How does orbiting work - well look at project echo from Nasa and you'll get your answer.
As for showing the curve of Earth - check out this video
it shows 3 Nasa shuttle launches shot from an airplane from 35,000 feet and the Flat Earth is clearly visible and they only thing that is curved is the exhaust from the flight path of the shuttle to make you think they are going around a curve.
Clue: being on the ladder means you're stupid. Being at the top of it means the most stupid. Don't get mad at me for not being stupid.
Of course I believe a "few" (it's more than a few, by the way) people in the military over thousands of retards. It's easy to do when I can recognize fact from fiction.
Of course I demolished your shit videos. I explained very clearly that rocket combustion isn't taking place in a vacuum like you claim it is. It's taking place inside the combustion chamber of the rocket engine, where the fuel tanks pump in thousands of gallons per minute of fuel and liquid oxygen. And just like a shotgun except for continuous burning, the rocket is propelled in the opposite direction from the exhaust (gun barrel). This is simple physics. Regrettably, you have a long track record of being stumped by physics so you argue from ignorance (incredulity).
Prove the camera on the SpaceX Falcon 9 has a fisheye lens. Until you do, it's just a bullshit claim that doesn't merit serious consideration.