Copy pasta for the indoctrinated stupid masses, I didn't think you could go lower than posting a link to a popular science tv show, but congratulations!

Next you'll be posting a picture from a popular mechanics magazine ad and claiming its proof.

This post was edited by card_sultan on Apr 26 2017 10:02pm

bump

Well look at that. With this sharp and witty rebuttal, you've just made rocket engines into not-rocket engines. You can now safely dodge the plainly laid out point so that you can continue to peddle your lies to the public. In a solid two-for-one deal, you also managed to avoid addressing the simple physics that you plainly can't wrap your head around, like how the chemical reaction in a bullet being fired pushes in 2 directions: the bullet is propelled in one direction, and the gun is pushed in the other. Just like a rocket.

all this flatness is disapointing
"extra-dimensional" y why not, how about a dimension full of spheric planets ?
Lets hope such possibility will not give you spots on the face / allergical reaction.

His statement in general is pretty incredulous. A thousand years ago people would say the same thing about sending a message thousands upon thousands of miles just to say "hello", because the level of technology was just destitute then. We can't imagine traveling billions of light years to do anything because it would be prohibitively difficult, but for all we know they've learned how to bend space and travel those distances faster than we can imagine.

It doesn't matter what he was using, the basic principle is still the same. You take two water molecule and you impart enough energy to separate them into hydrogen and oxygen. The reason it's not that interesting is that you aren't "burning water", you are burning hydrogen. We already have engines that do that, it's nothing new. The guy may have found a new way to separate water into hydrogen and oxygen, and it may even have some useful applications and advantages over current methods, but it's not some earth-shattering game changer. No government would care about trying to bury it, at best it's an improvement of existing technologies. It wouldn't have any impact on the daily life of an average citizen.
If you think governments are trying to suppress engines that burn less gasoline, then you haven't seen all the hybrid and electric cars driving around. Take a look at Tesla's shares one of these days, maybe. They are getting suppressed through the fucking roof, I'd like my company to get suppressed like that.

And man, talk about shallow and pedantic splitting of hairs. Fine, it's not a fire then. It sure as hell is combustion though, and in an environment that doesn't have readily available oxygen. Surely even you aren't so dumb as to keep thinking combustion can't happen in space, provided both fuel and oxygen were brought there in the rocket. You just can't admit that you didn't realize how simple the solution was - bring the oxygen with you. You thought it was this big problem that can't be overcome, and then when shown how simple the solution was you couldn't bear the shame of admitting that you were wrong. Now you are desperately trying to downplay the whole thing. But the fact remains - combustion works just fine in a vacuum.

Solid comparison - the recoil on a gun is close to 17,500 mph

So if rockets work in space (not near space which you think is space) why haven't they sent a man past 300 miles up since 1972, obviously that's where the fantasy begins and actual science gets thrown out the window in favor of indoctrination which you fell for hook line and sinker. yummy worm right, better eat it up.







Wireless communication is quite real because i can do it and have witnessed it, have you been to space, have you seen a rocket work in space - no? Didn't think so.




Stopped reading right there, of course it fukkin matters, thats the whole point that your totally missing with your strawman logic.



Sounds pretty stupid, maybe someone real stupid would believe that, - the kind stupid where you see a pretty illustration and then you totally believe it, something like that.

Something a gay ball troller would believe, cause all they can think of is how much they love balls.

This post was edited by card_sultan on Apr 27 2017 12:18pm

You witnessed it 1000 years ago? Damn.

Did I even remotely claim a gun's recoil is 17,500 mph? No. No I did not. I gave it as an example of a chemical reaction and how it creates force. But hey, leave it to you to make yet another retarded comparison to avoid the point. Next, you'll be straining to claim that shooting a gun in space won't move anything.

I have no interest in entertaining this line of bullshit. It asks and answers nothing of any relevance.

This thread is card sultans #1 post count farm