Lack of time Stamps or specifics. I win. it's like you're not even trying to address the video.

There is no proof of Gravity, there is no proof the the sun is 93 million miles away, there is no proof of drop on a ball earth except from the fraudsters at Nasa, Id address the mythematics but you need to prove those things first to even bring any credibility to the Heliocentric theory, if fact that's why it's still only a theory. The math does not prove the theory is correct, just that if the theory is correct - that would be the math.

You're really not a very good sniper, shooting bullets into the air doesn't mean you actually hit anything.



This post was edited by card_sultan on Jun 6 2016 08:21pm

If NASA was willing to fake something like the Earth being flat they would have had another moon-landing by now.

Well that makes no sense, why screw up a thing people saw on TV, what an amateur mind controlist...

It's a giant hole in your logic that NASA lies. If they were such great liars why haven't they gone to Mars yet?

Well, if they're not lies, then tell Nasa to launch a rocket into space with multiple non wide angle cameras and provide a continuous video from initial takeoff until the full earth is in view instead of the fake cgi composite single photos they provide.

Don't know if you realize this, but video footage is incredible cheap and easy to capture nowadays, so their excuses to not do this only hold weight with various people who disregard the fact that things are not proven by math alone or single photos or popular opinions and feel this issue can be won by just insulting the intelligence of anyone who dares question them.

That you don't need proof that the sun is 93 million miles away, that you don't need proof of drop, that you don't need proof of gravity to realize these are just theories you have complete faith in, is proof itself that you essentially don't have a clue what your talking about, grasping at straws, and about to have a complete breakdown of socially accepted adult conversation.

Mmmmhmm instead of actually addressing my point you dodge.

oh i thought you would get my point, I suppose I should have guessed you wouldn't since you don't seem to know that Nasa claims to have already landed multiple rovers there, and are completely oblivious to the fact you desperately need Nasa to prove the shape of the Earth and fill in the giant gaping holes in Heliocentricity.

This post was edited by card_sultan on Jun 6 2016 10:37pm

So yeah, if they were lieing why haven't they claimed to send a person there? Why are they just sending a few robots with cameras and not doing something grand like they did in the 60's?

Because robots on Antarctica are much cheaper at this point and they still need to improve CGi?

If they really went to the Moon, why are they only now admitting that they need to figure out how to safely get Humans past the Van Allen Belt? Shouldn't they have done that in the 60s?

This post was edited by card_sultan on Jun 6 2016 10:45pm