d2jsp
Log InRegister
d2jsp Forums > Off-Topic > General Chat > Science, Technology & Nature >
Poll > Flat Earth Vs Globe Earth
Prev1110111112113114119Next
Closed New Topic New Poll
  Guests cannot view or vote in polls. Please register or login.
Member
Posts: 12,198
Joined: Jun 3 2006
Gold: 10,188.69
Jul 23 2017 05:37pm


Completely unrelated, but I saw this while watching some funny thought experiments and stuff, and I thought of a certain someone when I saw this image.
Member
Posts: 23,832
Joined: Jun 18 2014
Gold: 6.69
Jul 23 2017 10:29pm
:lol:
Member
Posts: 63,908
Joined: Jun 26 2009
Gold: 169.70
Jul 23 2017 10:53pm
Quote (caswallen @ Jul 22 2017 08:47pm)
how can we accept scientific evidence from a scientist though???
aren't they prejudiced to what science is???

we need scientific evidence from religious leaders... only THEY are unprejudiced to scientific facts...


Exactly, even though you're trying to say that ironically, but this is exactly the point. For example , why can't we just ask OJ Simpson whether or not he killed his wife? He said he didn't do it, the court and a jury found him not guilty, and the police actually arrested the serial killer who admitted to the murder, so If the glove dont fit - you must acquit.
But those mere facts aren't going to stop 80% of white people succumbing to consensus populism and mob mentality by thinking 'But of course the Black guy did it, hang him"

Geocentricity is not a religious belief, it is a cosmological belief, and in fact if you walk into any church (do so carefully cause you might burst into flames) they will tell you that the believe the sphericity of the Earth as well as the religion of gravity.

We question everything and everyone, Doctors, dentist, mechanics, politicians, and priests now awday. No one is issued an ultimate truth card, nobody except astro-priests who tell use fantasies about space.


Quote (Santara @ Jul 23 2017 02:46am)
Easy to prove? So prove it. I have personally seen a Foucault's pendulum in action at the Smithsonian Institution, complete with axial rotation. What experiment do you have to counter it? Or physics explanation for it not working? Because Newton's 1st law is at play with this pendulum. The pendulum, being of sufficient mass and length to mostly counteract the minor amounts of friction it endures, oscillates in a straight line when nothing is acting upon it, yet as the Earth turns below it, it still "turns."


Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence, since you're the one claiming this is evidence that the earth is spinning – I require you show the entire pendulum including the fulcrum and if you can't, the magic trick is exposed as a fraud, a magic trick by covering up the true mechanics.

Quote (Santara @ Jul 23 2017 02:46am)
"Level" is relative to the ground. Since the ground level curves, so does level flight. So since the ground curvature is imperceptible down here at the surface, why would you expect to see a visible curve to another line running parallel to the ground? You still haven't proven "perspective," or even explained how it can work in the realm of physics. Try again.


You haven't shown any curvature – even balloons launched to 130,000 feet don't show it. Nasa photos are just composites and CGI-ed. Vsause said in his latest video that we cant see the entire earth till past 250,000 miles so that begs the question what are we shown because NASA admits the cant get a man past 400 miles up. When are you going to wake up to the deception? Optical perspective is not physics, in the way I use it, it is the difference between the way our eyes see between a 2d reality and our 3d depth perception.


Quote (Santara @ Jul 23 2017 02:46am)
No, rail gun rounds do not fly perfectly straight. Where the hell do you come up with that? They're subject to gravity like everything else. They just move faster, so the arc is smaller. Air doesn't "spin relative to Earth." It moves along with the surface of the Earth relative to a fixed point above the Earth. Try to keep up. Oh wait, you didn't write this, did you? tard_sultan is pm'ing you the replies, isn't he? He's the one who can't wrap his head around relative motion.
Yes, the air is moving 1000 mph, both in my house, and outside - relative to a fixed point above the Earth - not relative to a point on the ground.


Rail gun proof:


So the air inside your house is moving at 1000 mph too? I guess that's why everything in my house is stuck to the east walls.....

If the air is relative to the spin of earth we must be in a closed environment like inside a car, since NASA claims they went to the moon and send satellites all over the place clearly we are just in an open environment. The vacuum of space cannot make earth a closed environment because all vacuums prove more powerful than the force of gravity, and since our atmosphere is not sucked into the vacuum of space, obviously NASA is just making up stories that you have complete faith in.

Quote (Santara @ Jul 23 2017 02:46am)
You have zero proof of a conspiracy by NASA, much less proof of collusion with foreign space agencies. This is you committing an ad hominem. Speaking of which:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ad_hominem
...which is exactly what you're doing to NASA.


Actually your ad-hominem personal attacks are done to discredit. A better term of what I do by questioning the dogma of NASA is blasphemy and heresy of your sacred religious cult.

Quote (Santara @ Jul 23 2017 02:46am)
LMAO, so what you're saying is... Newtonian gravity was debunked by someone who was debunked?

No, in reality, Einstein expanded upon Newtonian gravity, further explaining it. And Einstein hasn't been debunked. Show proof he has before making the claim again, because you made the claim he was.


Despite your false believe that Wiki and Google hold all knowledge, you would do well to read some material beyond what you are taught.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Criticism_of_the_theory_of_relativity
https://www.eurekalert.org/pub_releases/2016-03/ngpi-tst030116.php
https://youtu.be/wRsGPq77X0Q
Member
Posts: 15,032
Joined: Apr 30 2008
Gold: 3.37
Jul 23 2017 11:10pm
:locked:
Member
Posts: 23,832
Joined: Jun 18 2014
Gold: 6.69
Jul 24 2017 12:12am
:locked:
Member
Posts: 30,432
Joined: Dec 28 2010
Gold: 134.69
Jul 24 2017 06:50am
Im finally allowed back in science section and this is the crap i come back to?
Member
Posts: 16,621
Joined: Jan 7 2017
Gold: 90.58
Jul 24 2017 06:52am
Quote (dude_927 @ Jul 24 2017 04:50am)
Im finally allowed back in science section and this is the crap i come back to?


well...
Member
Posts: 63,908
Joined: Jun 26 2009
Gold: 169.70
Jul 24 2017 06:56am
Quote (dude_927 @ Jul 24 2017 10:20pm)
Im finally allowed back in science section and this is the crap i come back to?


thanks for contributing......very insightful information you brought to the table
Member
Posts: 16,621
Joined: Jan 7 2017
Gold: 90.58
Jul 24 2017 06:59am
Quote (ChivasRegal @ Jul 24 2017 04:56am)
thanks for contributing......very insightful information you brought to the table


AHAHAH THE HYPOCRISY
Member
Posts: 30,432
Joined: Dec 28 2010
Gold: 134.69
Jul 24 2017 07:06am
Quote (ChivasRegal @ Jul 24 2017 07:56am)
thanks for contributing......very insightful information you brought to the table


What can you possibly say in the flat earth thread? Talk about how inferometers don't measure...much of anything? Talk about the difference from a composite image and a cgi image (as if op would accept that nasa isn't using mspaint)? Vertical distances, bridge building, red shift, gravitational compacting, live sattelite feeds, ect. Would all be a waste of time to adress with someone whoe doesnt beleive in the scientific method.

E: whoops, redshift is for geocentrism, although you probably could use it againt flat earthers depending on the type

This post was edited by dude_927 on Jul 24 2017 07:10am
Go Back To Science, Technology & Nature Topic List
Prev1110111112113114119Next
Closed New Topic New Poll