d2jsp
Log InRegister
d2jsp Forums > Off-Topic > General Chat > Science, Technology & Nature > Humans Are The Pinnacle Of Evolution.
Prev11011121314Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll
Member
Posts: 30,432
Joined: Dec 28 2010
Gold: 134.69
Dec 8 2014 05:33pm
Quote (Thor123422 @ Dec 8 2014 02:59am)
Yes, they were all human like, and that has all of nothing to do with the price of eggs in china.  There are plenty of animals set to take our place as the most intelligent species should we die off, and even if all apes died off, and even if all monkeys died off.  You just drew an arbitrary line saying "but, we diverged kind of recently!" instead of acknowledging you were wrong.  Move them goal posts, move em on back.

We manipulate our environment to some extent, but we haven't terraformed the earth or an unhospitable planet.  We've torn down some forests, dug some trenches, and increased the temperature of the earth by a few degrees, but we aren't going to transform the bottom of the ocean to an environment hospitable to humans and if the environment we choose to transform to our own benefit isn't adjascent to, or already rich with resources we can use there's not much survival going on.  There's a huge portion of desert where humans don't and cannot live, same for the artic.

Billions of people probably shouldn't exist, a basic biology course will go over carrying capacity and population crashes.  When the population goes over the carrying capacity the whole thing can collapse, so the number of humans alive today is also an irrelevant detail.



Really what this comes down to is I'm trying to explain integrals to somebody who doesn't know how to multiply, except change math to biology.  Explanations are going straight over your head because you  just don't know the facts.  I'm not saying anything controvertial, I'm basically parroting what every single biology book will tell you, that there is no pinnacle of evolution.


first off, fuck you! you will see the "dude_927 bottom of the ocean bubble" soon enough! second, the population can't go over carrying capacity, thats why it's carrying capacity (at least if i understand it correctly), carrying capacity can drop suddenly and cause a bunch of lives to be unsupportable, so i suppose population can get above carrying capacity, but not for long. Population crashes are a separate thing entirely (but i don't think you argued they were the same, just that they may intertwine? just wanted to point out they may not as well)

and...yea...hes...special, that was kind of obvious from the start really though
Member
Posts: 30,432
Joined: Dec 28 2010
Gold: 134.69
Dec 8 2014 05:34pm
Quote (Voyaging @ Dec 8 2014 06:25pm)
uhhhhhh


what you think he's doing everyday? mathletics? ok ok whatever the average 8 year old could do


This post was edited by dude_927 on Dec 8 2014 05:39pm
Member
Posts: 63,058
Joined: Jul 15 2005
Gold: 152.00
Dec 9 2014 07:15am
Quote (dude_927 @ Dec 8 2014 06:34pm)
ok ok whatever the average 8 year old could do


Not even close lol
Member
Posts: 66,666
Joined: May 17 2005
Gold: 17,384.69
Dec 9 2014 02:48pm
Quote (PixileDust @ 30 Oct 2014 22:16)
We are the pinnacle of the phenomenon known as "life."

Billions of years of evolution has lead to humans which are undoubtedly the alpha species.

Should we not attempt to further science and technology to help proliferate ourselves throughout the universe?

I think it is too risky to stay on one planet; we are too valuable from a scientific perspective.


I would never open my mouth like that, nothing prove humans are the pinnacle of whatever evolution, because "evolution" isnt over, ever.
Actually we are more like a disease destroying areas where we live.

If i was ET superior life form i would take care to not allowing you outside of the the solar system; and maybe not even allowing you to leave your own planet.
Conclusion; keep it low when talking about us and talk only for yourself...

=> So i heard you said you are the pinnacle of what ? :D

This post was edited by Saucisson6000 on Dec 9 2014 02:59pm
Member
Posts: 30,432
Joined: Dec 28 2010
Gold: 134.69
Dec 9 2014 03:43pm
Quote (Voyaging @ Dec 9 2014 08:15am)
Not even close lol


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chimpanzee#Intelligence (i was being generous actually by saying 8yr old, i'm convinced they are smarter than that, but this is not the forum for speculation)

e: please provide links for your rebuttal (i know Wikipedia isn't the greatest link, but it is fairly well cited if you check)

ee: "Chimpanzees are capable of reasoned thought, abstraction and have a concept of self. Chimps use reasoned thought when they process information and use their memory, for example when finding fruit according to what season it is. Chimps are capable of generalization and symbolic representation, as they are able to group symbols together, and some chimps have even learned how to use American Sign Language. Chimps also have a “concept of self”, which refers to an individual’s perception of their being in relation to others. An interesting test that is often used is to see if an animal recognizes themselves in mirrors – chimps can do this, while most other animals cannot!
Those who have worked closely with chimpanzees agree that they feel and express emotions such as sadness and happiness, fear and despair—and they know mental as well as physical pain." -janegoodall.ca

eee: "They are social creatures that appear to be capable of empathy, altruism, self-awareness, cooperation in problem solving and learning through example and experience. Chimps even outperform humans in some memory tasks." -http://www.nytimes.com/2007/04/17/science/17chimp.html?pagewanted=all&_r=0 (ny times)

eeee: "Matsuzawa Tetsuro, a Kyoto-based primate researcher has tested 5-year old chimpanzees in a game where they had to recognize multiple numbers that were revealed to them very quickly, and the chimps walked away with an astounding 80% accuracy. For comparative purposes, a fantastic human score, posted by a first-year doctoral candidate is around 10 percent." - national geographic (http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2008/05/080509-memory-video-ap.html)

This post was edited by dude_927 on Dec 9 2014 04:10pm
Member
Posts: 30,432
Joined: Dec 28 2010
Gold: 134.69
Dec 9 2014 04:19pm
^ and don't you dare use "chimps can't talk" as an argument, their vocal chords are situated too high for human speech, but similar to, i dunno an 8 yr old with damaged vocal chords, they can learn sign language (fine humans sign around 2-3, chimps 4-5, but the chimp has to freaking learn from a different species)

This post was edited by dude_927 on Dec 9 2014 04:41pm
Member
Posts: 63,058
Joined: Jul 15 2005
Gold: 152.00
Dec 9 2014 05:54pm
Lol I won't even bother if you think the reason chimps can't talk is due to a lack of proper vocal apparatus and not due to a lack of cognitive ability.

If you think chimps are more intelligent than 8-year-olds we have VERY different conceptions of what intelligence is.
Member
Posts: 30,432
Joined: Dec 28 2010
Gold: 134.69
Dec 9 2014 06:46pm
Quote (Voyaging @ Dec 9 2014 06:54pm)
Lol I won't even bother if you think the reason chimps can't talk is due to a lack of proper vocal apparatus and not due to a lack of cognitive ability.

If you think chimps are more intelligent than 8-year-olds we have VERY different conceptions of what intelligence is.


as suspected, no links, chimps can talk just fine (in sign language), perhaps you could define intelligence? (and possibly win a nobel prize)

Of course we define it differently, you expect a chimp to beat you in a math test or get on the honour role in school, if you judge a fish by its ability to climb a tree you will forever see a fish as insignificant. I also agree that i cannot argue the point further simply because the "comparison" can only take place on things you excel at. Can you name a superior trait of humanity not acquainted with "pattern recognition"? chimps beat us at this, we just know how to use patterns to predict long term, they don't care, their long term situation has little to no effect on "getting laid".

Member
Posts: 63,058
Joined: Jul 15 2005
Gold: 152.00
Dec 9 2014 06:58pm
Quote (dude_927 @ Dec 9 2014 07:46pm)
as suspected, no links, chimps can talk just fine (in sign language), perhaps you could define intelligence? (and possibly win a nobel prize)

Of course we define it differently, you expect a chimp to beat you in a math test or get on the honour role in school, if you judge a fish by its ability to climb a tree you will forever see a fish as insignificant. I also agree that i cannot argue the point further simply because the "comparison" can only take place on things you excel at. Can you name a superior trait of humanity not acquainted with "pattern recognition"? chimps beat us at this, we just know how to use patterns to predict long term, they don't care, their long term situation has little to no effect on "getting laid".


Yes, chimps exceed humans in specific cognitive abilities. Lots of animals do.

Humans however, have introspective and rational thinking that far exceed what any human can do. We have created fundamental theories of physics, composed masterful symphonies, and shared epic narratives, things that require cognitive abilities orders of magnitude more than what the smartest non-human animals have.

We can think about our existence and our place in the world and ponder on it and express feelings and thoughts about it in mediums as complex as science and art.
Member
Posts: 30,432
Joined: Dec 28 2010
Gold: 134.69
Dec 9 2014 07:01pm
Quote (Voyaging @ Dec 9 2014 07:58pm)
Yes, chimps exceed humans in specific cognitive abilities. Lots of animals do.

Humans however, have introspective and rational thinking that far exceed what any human can do. We have created fundamental theories of physics, composed masterful symphonies, and shared epic narratives, things that require cognitive abilities orders of magnitude more than what the smartest non-human animals have.

We can think about our existence and our place in the world and ponder on it and express feelings and thoughts about it in mediums as complex as science and art.


agreed

patterns, patterns, patterns

i could cite goodall again about feelings, but lets face it you won't read it, science is not expression, and elephants can art (as well as many other species, but of course your art is superior)
Go Back To Science, Technology & Nature Topic List
Prev11011121314Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll