Foucault's Pendulum is easy prove, its simply a trick of winding some gears like a grandfather clock, unless you show me the actual fulcrum of one working – It's just a mechanical mind trick.

Of course the Sun going down is just perspective. Look at any plane flight and it flies completely level , it never dips its nose down or fly's on a curved path – it flies straight and disappears past the horizon. Have you ever seen a curved Contrail? No? Well isn't that strange....
How can railguns paint targets at 100 miles, their bullets fly absolutely straight. If the air spins relative to the Earth at 1040 mph down to 0 mph at the North pole – why doesn't an airplane traveling north have to constantly adjust for it?
Are you telling me the air around you is really going at 1000mph? Even in your house? If the Earth spins at 1040 mph to the East, how can you talk to someone West of you – cause the sound would never reach them, cause that air is traveling 1000 mph to the east. Does sound travel at different speed depending on which way you talk?
Do basketball player need to adjust their shots for Coriolis depended on which end of the court they are on or depending on the orientation of the stadium? C'mon man.



Of course the world is round, the question is whether its a spinning sphere or a flattish plane. Nasa collaborates with all other Space Agencies and in fact they coordinate everything in the air including all plane flights routes. Look up NACA, NASA is not just outer space, its everything in the Air and up.





See how you twist meaning into your own warped reality. You attack the person, you insult to discredit the person in your own mind to motivate your spinning Ball prejudice. Since all truth passes through 3 stages, it just appear you got stuck on stage 2 a little too much.
Also attacking the source of an argument is not ad-hominem. If someone complains about an opinion in a you-tube video, it's not ad-hominem. If someone says your an idiot for posting that opinion because it disagrees with my bias, that ad-hominem. In short – attacking the source is not ad-hominem.



Consensus is exactly why you believe in the spinning Earth. Without your fake pictures from NASA you have nothing really except your Faith in Newtonian Gravity which actually Einstein Debunked.
And since Einstein has been debunked many times, you go to a handful of myths which are easily refuted. After that you probably realize all you just got are insults, mockery, and consensus, so basically nothing but social constructs that only expose your Heliovertedness.

"spinning ball prejudice"


lmfaaao fucking lost it

no wonder why mods don't close this shit, it's hilarious

This post was edited by JohnMiller92 on Jul 23 2017 12:25am

how can we accept scientific evidence from a scientist though???
aren't they prejudiced to what science is???

we need scientific evidence from religious leaders... only THEY are unprejudiced to scientific facts...

Chivas' logic^

Easy to prove? So prove it. I have personally seen a Foucault's pendulum in action at the Smithsonian Institution, complete with axial rotation. What experiment do you have to counter it? Or physics explanation for it not working? Because Newton's 1st law is at play with this pendulum. The pendulum, being of sufficient mass and length to mostly counteract the minor amounts of friction it endures, oscillates in a straight line when nothing is acting upon it, yet as the Earth turns below it, it still "turns."



"Level" is relative to the ground. Since the ground level curves, so does level flight. So since the ground curvature is imperceptible down here at the surface, why would you expect to see a visible curve to another line running parallel to the ground? You still haven't proven "perspective," or even explained how it can work in the realm of physics. Try again.

No, rail gun rounds do not fly perfectly straight. Where the hell do you come up with that? They're subject to gravity like everything else. They just move faster, so the arc is smaller. Air doesn't "spin relative to Earth." It moves along with the surface of the Earth relative to a fixed point above the Earth. Try to keep up. Oh wait, you didn't write this, did you? tard_sultan is pm'ing you the replies, isn't he? He's the one who can't wrap his head around relative motion.
Yes, the air is moving 1000 mph, both in my house, and outside - relative to a fixed point above the Earth - not relative to a point on the ground.
No.
No.



You have zero proof of a conspiracy by NASA, much less proof of collusion with foreign space agencies. This is you committing an ad hominem. Speaking of which:



https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ad_hominem



...which is exactly what you're doing to NASA.



LMAO, so what you're saying is... Newtonian gravity was debunked by someone who was debunked?

No, in reality, Einstein expanded upon Newtonian gravity, further explaining it. And Einstein hasn't been debunked. Show proof he has before making the claim again, because you made the claim he was.