d2jsp
Log InRegister
d2jsp Forums > Off-Topic > General Chat > Science, Technology & Nature > Monolths
Prev1107108109110111174Next
Closed New Topic New Poll
Views: 43775Replies: 1733Track Topic
Member
Posts: 63,097
Joined: Jan 11 2005
Gold: 9,765.00
Warn: 60%
#1081
Apr 20 2017 03:07pm
Quote (remco6 @ Apr 20 2017 10:00am)
I would never expect you too actually investigate or question your own assumptions but thanks for illustrating how you operate believing blindly in assumptions without any evidence.


Are you talking about how people believed in Ball Earth theory for 500-2500 years without the fake evidence from Nasa solely based on the misguided assumptions of Astro-priests?

Its a good thing Nasa showed use the Blue Marble then right? I mean they really proved it right?

Slight problem with that...



Member
Posts: 52,224
Joined: Jan 3 2009
Gold: 8,902.00
#1082
Apr 20 2017 04:44pm
Quote (tard_sultan @ Apr 20 2017 04:07pm)
Are you talking about how people believed in Ball Earth theory for 500-2500 years without the fake evidence from Nasa solely based on the misguided assumptions of Astro-priests?

Its a good thing Nasa showed use the Blue Marble then right? I mean they really proved it right?

Slight problem with that...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZC8wYukRsdQ


No, he's probably talking about believing in a flat Earth with no evidence of a flat Earth.

This post was edited by Santara on Apr 20 2017 04:44pm
Member
Posts: 27,424
Joined: Nov 13 2008
Gold: 3,932.08
#1083
Apr 20 2017 05:01pm
Quote (card_sultan @ Apr 20 2017 03:07pm)
Are you talking about how people believed in Ball Earth theory for 500-2500 years without the fake evidence from Nasa solely based on the misguided assumptions of Astro-Scientists?

Its a good thing Nasa showed use the Blue Marble then right? I mean they really proved it right?

Slight problem with that...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZC8wYukRsdQ


fixed^
Member
Posts: 63,097
Joined: Jan 11 2005
Gold: 9,765.00
Warn: 60%
#1084
Apr 20 2017 05:27pm
I think you're trying to say:

Quote (Santara @ Apr 20 2017 12:44pm)
No, he's probably talking about believing in a flat Earth without anyevidence of a flat Earth.


Is that what you mean? There actually lots of evidence the Earth is flat, just not a picture from Nasa which you think is all the proof you need.




This post was edited by card_sultan on Apr 20 2017 05:34pm
Member
Posts: 52,224
Joined: Jan 3 2009
Gold: 8,902.00
#1085
Apr 20 2017 05:38pm
Quote (tard_sultan @ Apr 20 2017 06:27pm)
I think your trying to say:



Is that what you mean? There actually lots of evidence the Earth is flat, just not a picture from Nasa which you think is all the proof you need.


http://i.imgur.com/h4GtrMN.png


No, I meant what I wrote. If anything were to correct it, it would read as follows:

"No, he's probably talking about believing in a flat Earth with no evidence of a flat Earth being present.

I figured even you could figure that out.

Because you don't have evidence. You have easily debunked videos coupled to an extremely poor understanding of basic physics.
Member
Posts: 14,319
Joined: Jun 19 2010
Gold: 7,271.48
#1086
Apr 20 2017 06:37pm
What Santana said, just extend it to pretty much anything you've ever claimed.
Member
Posts: 40,852
Joined: Sep 17 2011
Gold: 0.00
#1087
Apr 20 2017 09:45pm
Quote (card_sultan @ 18 Apr 2017 18:49)
It would cause more that a spot - most of the negative film should have suffered from severe fogging

The em radiation density in space below the Van Allen belt alone is enough to cause live film concerns, in the Van Allen belt it much higher and in the plasmasphere it's even higher, this is why Nasa or any space agency has never sent a man above 400 miles since 1972 - that Nasa claims they did it 6x in 1969-1972 is pretty incredulous.

Astronots didn't even know what the Van Allen belt was - I mean really?



On a different note - wtf you think is up with this?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=304O-PZ_uZM


Below which Van Allen belt?
Member
Posts: 63,097
Joined: Jan 11 2005
Gold: 9,765.00
Warn: 60%
#1088
Apr 21 2017 08:39am
Quote (Santara @ Apr 20 2017 01:38pm)
No, I meant what I wrote. If anything were to correct it, it would read as follows:

"No, he's probably talking about believing in a flat Earth with no evidence of a flat Earth being present.

I figured even you could figure that out.

Because you don't have evidence. You have easily debunked videos coupled to an extremely poor understanding of basic physics.


haha, what a desperate liar, you think debunking videos is done by misunderstanding them and misunderstanding is all you have which you've done with every post.

Flat Earth is the fastest growing movement and you can't stop it, so sad.
Member
Posts: 52,224
Joined: Jan 3 2009
Gold: 8,902.00
#1089
Apr 21 2017 08:48am
Quote (tard_sultan @ Apr 21 2017 09:39am)
haha, what a desperate liar, you think debunking videos is done by misunderstanding them and misunderstanding is all you have which you've done with every post.

Flat Earth is the fastest growing movement and you can't stop it, so sad.


LOOOOOOL!!!!!! I just don't UNDERSTAND how they're trying to spin the bullshit!!!!!! You can't make this shit up, people!

For real though. It doesn't matter how many times I explain to you precisely why your sources don't say what you think they say, or how they're just outright wrong. You're still going to believe the bullshit they're peddling, and you're somehow going to magically call what your sources say is 'science.' The human capacity for willful blindness is astounding, I swear.
Member
Posts: 40,852
Joined: Sep 17 2011
Gold: 0.00
#1090
Apr 21 2017 09:48am
Quote (card_sultan @ 21 Apr 2017 14:39)


Flat Earth is the fastest growing movement.


:rofl:
Go Back To Science, Technology & Nature Topic List
Prev1107108109110111174Next
Closed New Topic New Poll

© 2003-2026 d2jsp  Contact