The fact they were able to capture the space around the ball negates your angle of view yet denotes they would have needed a very wide angle lense to photograph a complete ball from an imaginary 3000 mile away perspective so also pointing out its nothing more than a typical but blatant lie from yourself.



So what you are suggesting is the bottom pic, that they fudged it. You have the same problem all ball earthers have, you dont understand perspective at all and refuse to learn it.
I see how you think though, you still think the horizon is the curve of the earth dont you, tell me would there be a horizon on Flat Earth, Would the Sun ever set?

This post was edited by card_sultan on Apr 14 2017 11:08am

the real question here is, will matrix 4 come out BEFORE or AFTER this topic is closed.

a quick update on my conversation with the universe...

still cant get an answer from them, plants at home + miss water couldnt be persuaded by ur very logical arguments... they still think u r an idiot

keep trying tho!

This post was edited by luckspin on Apr 14 2017 05:51pm

Umm... no, you don't get it at all, unfortunately. The lines drawn aren't their entire field of vision. Their field of vision isn't limited by some arbitrary lines, they can look around and see space and anything else they want. They could take a 360 degree picture if they wanted to. The lines just show what part of the Earth they can see.
Man, it's like trying to explain grade 5 geometry to my 3 year old.

Bottom pic is just the lens acting like that. Fish eye effect https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fisheye_lens

Congratulations - you get it - known you can begin to understand the blue marble.




So you only think think they were only able to catch a partial wide angle view? So if your view is only 30 miles - the Earth should still be round right?

Perspective has nothing to do with the lense you choose right? So which one of these pictures is correct - cause they cant both be.

More proof the Vikings where in North America long before it was officially discovered, the Kensington Runestone made in 1362 also hints at Vatican knowledge.

Yeah, you have no idea what's going on. It's not really surprising you believe in a flat earth, you don't understand anything about pretty much anything. You can't even conceptualize what a sphere is or how it works in three dimensional space, so how can you be expected to understand what being on a sphere is like? A flat earth is just simpler, which is better for simpler minds.
It makes sense that people of lower intelligence prefer simpler ideas, so it's not really your fault. It's not a choice you can make, it's just who you are.

Its not surprising you're totally blind - you deflect your cognitive dissonance into high gear whenever you see pictures like in post #1055 by shifting the goalposts with some circlejerk logic, or making up totally random Apollo views to explain your ignorance. Geocentricity is not simple - you need to understand actual 3d perspective and you only demonstrated that you think you live in 2d flatland. Perhaps you learn one day, perhaps you won't, watever, stay triggered. There are no proofs we live on a spinning sphere, just your shameless desire to keep living the fantasy.



This post was edited by card_sultan on Apr 15 2017 07:05pm

So show me your educated.



All you do is taught how Heliocentricity is awesome and those that doubt it are retarded.

So are these tracks going up to the curve of the Earth?

Is the horizon due to the curve of the Earth?

If you were on a ball Earth, where on the ball would you be?

Off to the the side?

So do rivers really flow up to the curve, could you explain that?

This post was edited by card_sultan on Apr 15 2017 07:45pm

bwahahhahaha he gives you 100% proof the earth is sphere and to disprove him you show a picture of railroad tracks