God is dead, prove me wrong. We have basically dismantled the Christian God in this thread. Whos next?

Whoa, people change their ideas to fit known facts?

That's dirty, man, just plain dirty.

Summation: For science to disprove god, it would have to disprove all possible conceptions of God.

Science does not concern itself with theology, only with the pursuit of the truth. If the ultimate truth is that no God exists, thats merely a coincidence.

If you place the search for proof for God's nonexistence as the goal of science, you are as bad as the creationists placing scripture as the end argument and searching for proof in between.

Christian God dismantles itself. It's full of inconsistencies and contradictions.

Could science disprove a god that was merely an everlasting observer?

I: It will be done, just a matter of time.

B: I don't disproving God is too easy for science. I find deciphering the Human Genome to be the most important goal of Science at the moment.



There is no observation in death.

This post was edited by Jazz_Thing on May 22 2009 12:43pm

hahahahahaha

More stupid, ignorant, blind assertions that have absolutely nothing to do with reality.

Also, I am pretty sure that I remember reading something about there being a burden of proof on the one who is making the claims? I read that somewhere, hm, where was it....

Trying to shift the burden of proof on to me when my argument is simply "God still exists as a possibility beside Science" is pretty fucking hilarious. You're the one making extraordinary claims, all I'm saying is that there is still a room for the possibility of God, which I have backed up with proof all over the place. I have no interest in disproving the ignorant assertions of a moron.

This thread requires more Sad faces, for more proof tbh.

God is dead btw. We all killed him quite well.

lololol - awww, more complaints about emoticons from a moron who can't deal with evidence in front of his nose.

So very, very sad.

You call your words evidence? Look at the picture on the first page.

Worth a thousand words? Oh please.

Nah, I consider my quotes from dogma and my constant reminders to you that you can't disprove God to be 'proof.' Hell, you even ceded this argument to me last time we had it for long enough, don't you remember? The fact that you can't actively disprove God and that there is a chance, no matter how ridiculously small, that God exists?

Do I have to go dig up the thread? I guess I can, if you want.