d2jsp
Log InRegister
d2jsp Forums > Off-Topic > General Chat > Science, Technology & Nature >
Poll > Lets Talk Science. More Specificaly "peer Review"
Prev123411Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll
  Guests cannot view or vote in polls. Please register or login.
Member
Posts: 22,916
Joined: Jan 18 2010
Gold: 45,015.90
Warn: 10%
Jan 12 2022 09:30am
We are just animals. Were just monkeys in space. Same same.
Member
Posts: 32,984
Joined: Mar 17 2005
Gold: 6.00
Jan 12 2022 10:31am
Quote (Snyft2 @ Dec 9 2021 01:52pm)
that annoys me as well. a few days ago a guy that worked in a covid hospital said something like "we see a lot of vaccinated people here in the ward. you know what we dont see? those who already had corona. there is a massive difference between the quality of those immunities", and people started raging WHERE IS THE LINK FOR THAT
he was like "umm i worked there for a year..." but that just made them even more mad :wacko:

personally if someone says "whats the link/study on that" instead of "whats your experience with that", i take it as a red flag :wacko:


anecdotal evidence anecdotal evidence anecdotal evidence anecdotal evidence anecdotal evidence anecdotal evidence anecdotal evidence anecdotal evidence anecdotal evidence anecdotal evidence anecdotal evidence anecdotal evidence anecdotal evidence anecdotal evidence anecdotal evidence anecdotal evidence anecdotal evidence anecdotal evidence anecdotal evidence anecdotal evidence anecdotal evidence anecdotal evidence anecdotal evidence anecdotal evidence anecdotal evidence anecdotal evidence anecdotal evidence anecdotal evidence anecdotal evidence anecdotal evidence anecdotal evidence anecdotal evidence anecdotal evidence anecdotal evidence anecdotal evidence anecdotal evidence anecdotal evidence anecdotal evidence anecdotal evidence anecdotal evidence anecdotal evidence anecdotal evidence anecdotal evidence anecdotal evidence anecdotal evidence anecdotal evidence anecdotal evidence anecdotal evidence anecdotal evidence anecdotal evidence anecdotal evidence anecdotal evidence anecdotal evidence anecdotal evidence anecdotal evidence anecdotal evidence anecdotal evidence
Member
Posts: 39,281
Joined: Sep 5 2016
Gold: 0.69
Jan 12 2022 01:05pm
Quote (ChronFather420 @ Jan 12 2022 07:30am)
We are just animals. Were just monkeys in space. Same same.


hi, thanks for stopping by. you realize what your offering is just a belief with no backing? it is called assertion fallacy.

"atheist science" has fallen apart
Dr. Craig Venter Denies Common Descent in front of Richard Dawkins!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MXrYhINutuI
Member
Posts: 10,876
Joined: Mar 23 2017
Gold: 12,797.00
Warn: 30%
Jan 13 2022 06:28pm
Quote (Subwoofer @ Jan 12 2022 05:31pm)
anecdotal evidence anecdotal evidence anecdotal evidence anecdotal evidence anecdotal evidence anecdotal evidence anecdotal evidence anecdotal evidence anecdotal evidence anecdotal evidence anecdotal evidence anecdotal evidence anecdotal evidence anecdotal evidence anecdotal evidence anecdotal evidence anecdotal evidence anecdotal evidence anecdotal evidence anecdotal evidence anecdotal evidence anecdotal evidence anecdotal evidence anecdotal evidence anecdotal evidence anecdotal evidence anecdotal evidence anecdotal evidence anecdotal evidence anecdotal evidence anecdotal evidence anecdotal evidence anecdotal evidence anecdotal evidence anecdotal evidence anecdotal evidence anecdotal evidence anecdotal evidence anecdotal evidence anecdotal evidence anecdotal evidence anecdotal evidence anecdotal evidence anecdotal evidence anecdotal evidence anecdotal evidence anecdotal evidence anecdotal evidence anecdotal evidence anecdotal evidence anecdotal evidence anecdotal evidence anecdotal evidence anecdotal evidence anecdotal evidence anecdotal evidence anecdotal evidence


at some point anecdotal evidence becomes actual evidence, as its not really hard to find someone who has worked in a covid hospital anywhere in the world and whom you trust :unsure: doesnt even have to be a doctor, just to work there. people talk, you know :blush:
Member
Posts: 2,978
Joined: Jul 5 2005
Gold: 8,211.00
Jan 15 2022 03:06am
All of our discoveries continue to back up that evolution is true at the microscopic and at the macro levels. Literally you can look at almost anything and figure out how those traits improve survability.

After that it's basic statistics to understand that as the smaller subset of the population has genetic traits that let them survive, they get to reproduce and pass those genes on. The animals that don't have those favorable genetic traits die.

Then the smaller subset of the population just became a larger subset of the population. Eventually they become the majority.

Evolution is real. Doesn't matter if you believe in God. However if these evolutionary plans were designed by God, they have some serious flaws from time to time. Evolution is not perfect.
Member
Posts: 39,281
Joined: Sep 5 2016
Gold: 0.69
Jan 15 2022 12:32pm
Quote (Pelnied @ Jan 15 2022 01:06am)
All of our discoveries continue to back up that evolution is true at the microscopic and at the macro levels. Literally you can look at almost anything and figure out how those traits improve survability.

After that it's basic statistics to understand that as the smaller subset of the population has genetic traits that let them survive, they get to reproduce and pass those genes on. The animals that don't have those favorable genetic traits die.

Then the smaller subset of the population just became a larger subset of the population. Eventually they become the majority.

Evolution is real. Doesn't matter if you believe in God. However if these evolutionary plans were designed by God, they have some serious flaws from time to time. Evolution is not perfect.


the argument "macro" vrs "micro" evolution.
you just explained "micro" evolution and very very few people will argue that

explains survival of the fittest but doesnt explain arrival of the fittest

did you view this vid? how many naturalistic abiogenesis events are you willing to accept?
Dr. Craig Venter Denies Common Descent in front of Richard Dawkins!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MXrYhINutuI

"However if these evolutionary plans were designed by God, they have some serious flaws from time to time."
(scripture is clear. the world is in a fallen condition. "flaws" do not challenge the biblical narrative.)
Member
Posts: 1,161
Joined: Sep 29 2021
Gold: 0.00
Jan 15 2022 12:33pm
waiting for the day humans evolve and can fly! hopefully in my lifetime.
Member
Posts: 39,281
Joined: Sep 5 2016
Gold: 0.69
Jan 15 2022 12:48pm
Quote (kaisersigismund @ Jan 15 2022 10:33am)
waiting for the day humans evolve and can fly! hopefully in my lifetime.


the hard science says "genetic entropy"
Member
Posts: 2,978
Joined: Jul 5 2005
Gold: 8,211.00
Jan 15 2022 12:51pm
Quote (TiStuff @ Jan 15 2022 01:32pm)
the argument "macro" vrs "micro" evolution.
you just explained "micro" evolution and very very few people will argue that

explains survival of the fittest but doesnt explain arrival of the fittest

did you view this vid? how many naturalistic abiogenesis events are you willing to accept?
Dr. Craig Venter Denies Common Descent in front of Richard Dawkins!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MXrYhINutuI

"However if these evolutionary plans were designed by God, they have some serious flaws from time to time."
(scripture is clear. the world is in a fallen condition. "flaws" do not challenge the biblical narrative.)


I very clearly explained the same processes that allow for micro and macro evolution. It's not my fault if you cannot imagine time scales beyond a few thousand years to be able to see how macro evolution takes place.

Dude the bible is a book of stories written at a time when most of the population was illiterate. Only 86% of the people in the world can read. In countries like Afghanistan and Iraq, they are still less than 50% literate.

Yeah I watched the video. All he said is that there isn't a tree of life, there may be a bush of life. There's no argument here. There's no data. That "debate" is just an entertainment discussion. Why do you think the comments section was turned off? Because the video has nothing meaningful to offer and discuss.
Member
Posts: 39,281
Joined: Sep 5 2016
Gold: 0.69
Jan 15 2022 01:08pm
Quote (Pelnied @ Jan 15 2022 10:51am)
I very clearly explained the same processes that allow for micro and macro evolution. It's not my fault if you cannot imagine time scales beyond a few thousand years to be able to see how macro evolution takes place.

Dude the bible is a book of stories written at a time when most of the population was illiterate. Only 86% of the people in the world can read. In countries like Afghanistan and Iraq, they are still less than 50% literate.

Yeah I watched the video. All he said is that there isn't a tree of life, there may be a bush of life. There's no argument here. There's no data. That "debate" is just an entertainment discussion. Why do you think the comments section was turned off? Because the video has nothing meaningful to offer and discuss.


you ever wonder why even the "scientists" are willing to accept the idea of panspermia? the aliens did it..............
pan·sper·mi·a
/panˈspərmēə/
Learn to pronounce
noun
noun: panspermia

the theory that life on the earth originated from microorganisms or chemical precursors of life present in outer space and able to initiate life on reaching a suitable environment.

Panspermia is the hypothesis that life exists throughout the Universe, distributed by space dust, meteoroids, asteroids, comets, and planetoids, as well as by spacecraft carrying unintended contamination by microorganisms. Panspermia is a fringe theory with little support amongst mainstream scientists. Wikipedia

dawkins is ready to go for it...................dawkins
Richard Dawkins and aliens
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UIHiggcVZvY

This post was edited by TiStuff on Jan 15 2022 01:13pm
Go Back To Science, Technology & Nature Topic List
Prev123411Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll